View clinical trials related to Stroke.
Filter by:flow restriction training combined with routine rehabilitation training can promote the recovery of lower limb muscle strength on the hemiplegic side of stroke patients, improve the lower limb motor function of patients, and further improve their daily life and walking ability. It provides a new treatment method for stroke patients with hemiplegia that leads to lower limb function loss and activity disorder, and the therapy also has the advantages of simple operation, high safety, good patient compliance and low cost, which is worthy of further clinical research and promotion.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore Clinical Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding in Dysphagic Stroke Survivors. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Can Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding improve psychological status in Dysphagic Stroke Survivors? - Can Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding improve social interaction in Dysphagic Stroke Survivors? Patients will be randomly allocated into the control group or the experimental group, all under rehabilitation treatment, the experimental group will be given Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding as nutrition support and the control group will be given Nasogastric tube. The study lasts 21 days for each patient. Researchers will compare the Social Functioning Scale, Social Support Questionnaire, Patients Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7 to see if the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding can help improve the symptom.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The study recruited stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment and dysphagia who were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation treatment in three hospitals in mainland China as the participants (study subjects). The study duration for each participant was 15 days. The subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. During the treatment, all patients received routine rehabilitation treatment. In addition, patients in the control group received conventional cognitive training, while patients in the experimental group received computer-assisted cognitive training.
This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and nasogastric tube feeding, respectively. Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences in feeding amount and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the control group will use Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will compare changes in daily intake and nutritional status of two groups of patients before and after the study to see if Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube can improve the feeding amount and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients compared to Nasogastric Tube
"Robot-assisted rehabilitation is used to mitigate the devastating effects of stroke and to recover the ability to perform complex motor tasks in survivors. One common issue is that robotic devices are costly and only available to individuals in limited capacity. Increasing efficiency by reducing required physical practice time or by improving training gains is therefore crucial to improve outcomes in robot-assisted rehabilitation after stroke. We are aiming to implement dyad learning as a learning paradigm that increases motor learning within a given timeframe for individuals to overcome this issue. Dyad learning is form of sensorimotor learning where participants learn in pairs, alternating between physical and observational practice. Between trials, learners are often allowed to engage in inter-trial dialog. Dyad learning has not been established as a tool in rehabilitation, despite its potential to either reduce required physical practice time or increase motor improvement. The general aim of this project is to determine the usability (Aim 1) and feasibility (Aim 2) of dyad learning in a wrist robot environment in individuals with chronic stroke, as well as transfer effects in two transfer task (Aim 3). Dyad learning is characterized as motor learning where learners alternate between physical and observational training. Physical practice means that a person performs the motor task themselves. Observational practice means that the learner watches someone else practice the motor task. In particular, the specific aims are as follows: Aim 1: To determine if a dyad learning paradigm in the wrist robot environment can be implemented in participants with chronic stroke. This aim seeks to determine the usability of dyad learning of a gamified motor task in the wrist robot environment. Successful completion of the study by participants will verify this aim. Aim 2: To determine the effect of dyad learning to improve wrist joint motor performance within the wrist robot environment. Participants with chronic stroke will be trained in a gamified motor task using a dyad learning paradigm. Motor performance will be measured by a performance motor score, a composite score that comprises spatial and temporal variables. Improvement in the performance motor score at the end of training will verify this aim. Aim 3: To determine if dyadic wrist motor training in the wrist robot environment leads to improvements in the performance of two untrained functional wrist movement tasks in participants with chronic stroke. This aim seeks to identify the transfer effects of dyadic learning-related motor training gains on functional motor performance. Participants will perform two untrained wrist join motor task before and after training. The motor task are line tracing and tracking tasks. Performance will be measured by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE), measuring how much the participant deviates from the line, as well as time-to-complete in seconds. A decrease in RMSE and/or in time-to-complete at the second visit compared to the first performance will verify this aim.
The proposed study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial involving patients with ischemic stroke who are candidates for receiving intravenous (IV) thrombolysis within 4.5 hours after stroke onset. The study aims to test the hypothesis that anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients, selected with "dual target" vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset, will have improved reperfusion and early neurological improvement when treated with intra-arterial clot retrieval after IV reteplase, compared to IV alteplase. Patients will be randomized into one of three treatment arms: local institutional IV thrombolysis, IV reteplase (9 U bolus), or IV reteplase (9 U bolus + 9 U bolus). The study will assess the primary angiographic endpoint of partial or complete recanalization following administration of thrombolytics, as well as the time of recanalization and the time from symptom onset to recanalization. Additional outcome measures include early neurological improvement, assessed by a ≥4-point improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the first 24 hours compared to baseline. The trial will be conducted in three groups based on the site of baseline arterial occlusion: internal carotid artery (ICA), proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA - M1), or distal middle cerebral artery (MCA - M2). The study aims to evaluate third-generation thrombolytic - RETAVASE® (reteplase) and compare it to IV alteplase, in acute ischemic stroke patients.
1. How many ERILs occur in caucasian patients with LAA stroke during 7 days on standard treatment? 2. How many SNILs occur between 7 and 30 days after acute ischemic event on standard treatment? 3. How many of during acute event diagnosed lesions (ERILs) are (still) detectable after 30 days? 4. Are there relevant risk faktors for the occurence of ERILs and SNILs (eg Diabetes or Biomarkers)?
Despite decades of national declines in stroke incidence, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in stroke prevalence and care remain pervasive and the gap in these disparities is widening. Those who identify as African American (AA) or Hispanic are 2-3 times more likely to have a stroke when compared to those who identify as non-Hispanic White (NHW) and are also less likely to receive guideline-based medical therapy (e.g. mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis, discharge antithrombotic/anticoagulant, smoking cessation education) after their stroke. Additionally, people living in underserved communities with high local social deprivation indices and decreased community-level healthcare access, have an increased population-level risk of stroke. These inequities are likely multi-factorial and in large part related to decreased access to health promotion and preventive care services, as well as social/economic constraints impeding patients' access and compliance with medical treatment recommendations. Innovations in patient-facing digital health technologies, such as telemedicine, remote patient monitoring (RPM), and patient-facing smart phone applications could help bridge the gaps in post stroke care in marginalized communities by providing more accessible, convenient and perhaps effective, health care services. A recent secondary stroke prevention trial with predominantly African American and Hispanic participants compared blood pressure control measured by RPM combined with telehealth support vs. standard office-based follow up and found improved adherence and risk factor control in the digitally assisted group. However, there is limited knowledge around the patient and provider-level barriers, and supportive and educational resources needed to translating these and other similar findings into practice, especially in high-risk communities. Importantly, the same barriers to adopting digitally assisted care delivery during transitions of care and in the management of high-risk groups are shared across a number of episodic (e.g. ACS), acute on chronic (e.g. asthma, COPD, heart failure, DKA) and chronic diseases (e.g. hypertension, renal failure).
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of BIIB131 on arterial revascularization (Part 1) and to determine if BIIB131 improves functional outcome as measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) when compared with placebo following acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (Part 2). The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of BIIB131 on angiographic reperfusion and infarct evolution, to determine if BIIB131 improves functional outcome, pharmacokinetic profile of BIIB131 (Part 1); to evaluate the effects of BIIB131 on acute and 90-day clinical outcomes (Part 2).