View clinical trials related to Stroke.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if deep brain stimulation (DBS) works to treat severe pain following a stroke in adults. It will also learn about the safety of deep brain stimulation. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does DBS lower the pain score in these participants. - What medical problems do participants have when having DBS? Researchers will compare different settings, to see if DBS works to treat severe post stroke pain. Participants will: - Undergo baseline screening procedures and have an MRI scan. - Have neurosurgery to put the DBS system in - Have follow up for 10 months - Visit the clinic at least 5 times in the study for check-ups and tests - Fill in questionnaires about pain and mood and have check ups remotely
Our objective is to carry out research on prevention and control of noncommunicable chronic diseases, and establish a risk prediction mechanism for chronic diseases to promote early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment of chronic diseases in natural population in Qianwan District of Ningbo, significantly reduce medical costs and extend population life span.
The aim of the study was to explore potential pathways for recovery and adaptation of neural pathways after stroke by examining electrical activity of the brain cortex and cortico-spinal excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with motor impairment after stroke. Participants in the study performed a simple stimulus-response task with a healthy and a paralysed limb several times at different stages of basic rehabilitation. To compare the data, a group of healthy volunteers took part in a similar experiment. We recorded cortical activity using electroencephalography and muscle activity using electromyography. After the stimulus-response task, we also carried out a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the integrity of corticospinal connections.
The purpose of the clinical trial is to find a treatment for stroke patients with cognitive impairment, and the main questions it aims to answer are: - [Search for effective treatments of cognitive impairment after stroke] - [explore the relationship between BDNF level and cognitive function] Participants will receive conventional treatment, tDCS treatment, .And then compare cognitive function and BDNF level
Following a stroke, persistent residual muscle weakness in the upper limb (UL) drastically impacts the individuals' quality of life and level of independence. Training interventions are recommended to promote UL motor recovery, and recent studies have shown that training must be tailored to each individual's recovery potential to maximise training gains. Complementary to training interventions, non-invasive brain stimulation devices (NIBS) can help support the provision of post-stroke care by modulating brain excitability and enhancing recovery. Among NIBS, cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM) is gaining increasing attention in rehabilitation since it can directly and non-invasively stimulate the tongue's cranial nerves. The impulses generated can then reach the motor cortex, induce neuroplastic changes and support recovery. Promising results in various neurological populations have been observed, but in stroke, the efficacy of CN-NINM at improving arm motor recovery and brain plasticity is yet to be determined. This is what the present project intends to address, using a stratified randomized controlled trial, where participants in the chronic phase of a stroke will take part in a 4-week individualized training program of their affected UL in combination with real or sham CN-NINM. Before and after the intervention, participants will undergo clinical and neurophysiological evaluations to thoroughly evaluate CN-NINM-induced changes in UL motor function and associated neuroplastic changes. The proposed study will allow an in-depth evaluation of the effects of CN-NINM for an eventual implementation in clinics and at home to support optimal post-stroke recovery.
Combining cortical tDCS with behavioral interventions has been shown to have beneficial outcomes in individuals post-stroke. However, cerebellar tDCS is a fairly new approach for individuals with unilateral cortical stroke and there has not been reports of duration of effect of tDCS applied to the cerebellum in this population. Information gained from this study will serve to fill knowledge gaps on the duration of effect of cerebellar tDCS and the effects of polarity. The purpose of this study is to determine the duration of effect of ventro-lateral cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in healthy adults through cortical excitability (CE), cognitive, language and motor assessment measures. Primary aim: Compare baseline CE from left motor cortex of first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and orbicularis oris (OO) areas to CE post cerebellar tDCS at 15 minutes, 45 minutes and 75 minutes. Single-pulse and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to measure and compare stimulus response curve (S/R curve), cortical silent period (CSP) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the hand area and facial area of the left primary motor cortex at each time point. Secondary aim: Compare baseline performance on cognition, motor learning and language tasks to performance at 15, 45 and 75 minutes after receiving tDCS. Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Serial Reaction Time Test (SRTT) and Lexical Decision tasks will be presented via a computer interface.
Sensorimotor function of the upper limb is often impaired after stroke, even in the chronic phase (minimum 6 months after stroke). Currently, an optimal assessment for sensory processing, one of the most important sensory functions, does not exists. However, our research team has developed a novel assessment paradigm using the KINARM End-Point robot to assess the level of sensory processing of the upper limb. Within a previous study, the investigators examined the validity within 20 chronic stroke patients and 80 age-matched healthy controls by comparing the novel robotic assessment with a set of existing clinical and robotic assessments for the upper limb. The investigators hypothesize that the stroke patients will show a poorer performance on this novel assessment compared to the healthy controls, that the novel assessment will show better correlation coefficients with other sensory tests compared to motor tests, that the novel assessment can differentiate between different motor subgroups of chronic stroke patients, and that the novel assessment shows good test-retest reliability.
Upper extremity hemiparesis is one of the most common symptoms after stroke. Robot-assisted therapies have been used as an approach to rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiplegia in recent years. Robot-assisted therapy is an approach to post-stroke rehabilitation that uses robotic devices to provide motor or task-oriented training to patients. When the literature is examined, there are studies showing that robot-assisted therapies are similar or superior to conventional methods. In order to provide the most effective rehabilitation approach in upper extremity robots, it is suggested that it may be more accurate to consider the robotic device as a training platform consisting of various therapeutic techniques and principles, not as a tool alone. A robotic system will be used to overcome the disadvantages of the existing robotic systems in the literature such as not providing support to the patient at the time of need, not providing fluidity in shoulder movements by not taking into account the scapulohumeral rhythm in upper extremity movements, long installation times, and ignoring task-oriented training. The system to be used is a self-aligning exoskeleton system for robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation. The system provides safe and versatile rehabilitation at increasing intensity and also allows for objective assessments. The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients.
Rationale: Acute stroke leaves many patients with functional deficits, of which upper extremity motor impairment is one of the most disabling. Evidence from imaging and electrophysiological studies converge on the idea that impaired motor function after stroke is associated with disrupted network activity in the brain. Non-invasive brain stimulation methods, like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can be used to restore disrupted network activity and have been shown to successfully facilitate recovery of motor function in patients with stroke. Application of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), an inhibitory form of TMS, to the contralesional motor cortex has been shown to improve the recovery of motor function in patients with stroke. However, responsiveness to this treatment varies considerably between stroke patients and the mechanisms through which contralesional cTBS facilitates recovery of motor function remain unclear. Objective: To determine if contralesional cTBS normalizes interhemispheric inhibition from the contralesional to ipsilesional primary motor cortex stroke patients with motor impairments. Age-matched healthy persons will serve as controls. Study design: A prospective, open-label within-subject intervention study Study population: 40 patients with first-ever ischemic stroke in one hemisphere and a unilateral paresis of the upper extremity, and 40 age-matched controls. Main endpoints: Primary endpoint: Interhemispheric inhibition from the contralesional to ipsilesional primary motor cortex. Secondary endpoints: contralesional intracortical inhibition; effect of contralesional TMS interference on finger tapping frequency.
This study was conducted in patients with ischemic stroke; This study was conducted to examine the effect of robotic rehabilitation and transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation applied in addition to robotic rehabilitation on the patient's functional level and autonomic nervous system. 40 people over the age of 18 participated in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups: robotic rehabilitation and transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation applied in addition to robotic rehabilitation. While the robotic rehabilitation group received Lokomat and neurological rehabilitation, the other group received stimulation with the Vagustim device, which is applied non-invasively through the ear, in addition to Lokomat and neurological rehabilitation. Spasticity, autonomic nervous system, walking speed, motor function, quality of life, muscle activity and pain were evaluated in both groups before starting treatment and six weeks after treatment. In the study, significance was evaluated at p<0.05 level.