View clinical trials related to Wounds and Injuries.
Filter by:This study will evaluate the effectiveness of an mHealth sedentary reduction program over a 6-month period of time in adults with past or present knee symptoms, injuries, or surgeries.
The objective of the EQUODIA study is to evaluate the hemodynamic stability of hemodialysis with low dialysate flow in patients requiring emergency hemodialysis in the context of acute kidney injury or unscheduled end-stage renal disease, not in intensive care, compared to conventional triweekly high-flow hemodialysis. Short daily hemodialysis has excellent hemodynamic tolerance, which has already been confirmed by clinical experience. This modality, commonly used in the patient's home through new machines allowing a low dialysate flow purification technique, can prove to be an innovative, effective and safe alternative for patients admitted for hemodialysis in an unscheduled situation (acute kidney injury, unscheduled end-stage renal disease not followed). Up to now, no studies have evaluated the use of short daily hemodialysis with low dialysate flow in patients with acute kidney injury or unscheduled end-stage renal disease, requiring the initiation of emergency extra-renal purification.
The investigators will compare the effect of spinal anesthesia to general anesthesia on the level of high sensitivity cardiac biomarkers in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. The investigators will also measure renal biomarkers in urine to evaluate kidney injury in the postoperative period.
This study evaluates the effect of a multilayer skin dressing (Mepilex) placed on the sacrum or a fluid filled pad (LiquiCell) on risk factors for pressure injuries under conditions consistent with military long-distance transport or prolonged field care. Participants will be assigned to one of six groups - air transport, air transport on a spinal immobilization surface with or without Mepilex or on a field stretcher with or without LiquiCell.
Infection and sepsis are common after acute kidney injury (AKI) and increase mortality. In this study, the investigators will determine whether patients with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery have immunosuppression as judged by blood markers of immunoparalysis.
Using Pirfenidone to treat Grade 2 or Grade3 radiation-induced lung injury, and observe the efficacy and safety of the drug.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by accidents is a very important public health problem in Taiwan. There are many people with brain damage and cognitive dysfunction caused by traumatic brain injury every year. Currently, there is no effective treatment for cognitive dysfunction caused by traumatic brain injury. Evidence from clinical studies in recent years suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy may be a treatment for repairing nerves after brain injury. Many studies have shown that oxidative stress and inflammatory responses play an important role in the pathogenesis of the central nervous system. In recent years, our research team has shown that oxidative stress and inflammatory response are significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury, cerebral hemorrhage, and stroke patients. More and more evidences also show that oxidative stress and inflammatory response play an important role in the neuropathological changes of mental cognitive sequelae after traumatic brain injury. This injury may be gradual from the time of head trauma. This process begins with the generation of oxidative stress and free radicals. When the cell repair and free radical scavenging system can not effectively overcome the excessive production of free radicals, an oxidative damage reaction will occur, causing a series of inflammatory cells and cytokines to be activated. Studies have also shown that when inhibiting those free radicals that produce oxidative stress, the neurological function and cognitive function of the head after trauma can be significantly improved. It is becoming widely acknowledged that the combined action of hyperoxia and hyperbaric pressure leads to significant improvement in tissue oxygenation while targeting both oxygenand pressure-sensitive genes, resulting in improved mitochondrial metabolism with anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects. The investigators published an article this year showing that hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve the prognosis of patients with acute stroke and increase endothelial progenitor cells in the systemic circulation. The investigators plan to conduct this research project through hyperbaric oxygen therapy and neuropsychological therapy, and using scientific tests and neurocognitive function assessments. The investigators hope to answer the following questions: (1) Whether the treatment of hyperbaric oxygen can improve oxidative stress and inflammatory response after brain injury, and observe changes in biomarker concentration; (2) Whether hyperbaric oxygen therapy and neuropsychological therapy can improve cognitive function after brain injury; and (3) which biomarkers are factors that influence cognitive function prognosis.
Acute traumatic rib fractures are a common issue for patients of trauma surgeons. They inflict substantial morbidity, the most dreaded and consequential of which are pulmonary complications. While these fractures are often treated non-operatively, there is a continued need for effective adjuvant treatments to improve rib fracture pain and outcomes. Prior studies have evaluated outcome measures for traumatic rib fractures that include respiratory failure, tracheostomy requirement, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, narcotic requirement, daily maximum incentive spirometry volume, pneumonia, and mortality . Rib belts, which have been present since at least 1945, have long been used to provide pain relief via chest wall stabilization [3]. However there is an extreme paucity of literature regarding their clinical efficacy, and their use has largely been abandoned due to concerns that they may have been overly constricting and resulted in poorer respiratory (pulmonary/breathing) outcomes. Newer generation rib belts are more elastic and theoretically less constricting than their earlier generation predecessors, however their clinical efficacy has not been yet demonstrated. The investigators will therefore plan to perform a prospective trial to determine if these rib strapping devices are effective clinical tools in the traumatic rib fracture population. The goal of the study is institutional quality improvement, to determine if the investigators see benefit of these devices for the pain management of our trauma population. The investigators will also conduct this as a pilot trial for hopeful future research applications, however the overall goal is institutional improvement. Patients determined to be eligible for the study by the admitting physician (and per the previously defined criteria) will be recruited to enroll in the project within the first 24 hours of their hospital admission. Recruited patients will be offered the opportunity to consent to enrollment in the study and will be assigned by the study team into either the intervention (RibFx belt +current standard of care) or control (current standard of care) arm in a quasi-experimental prospective design: untreated control group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. In this manner, the intervention arm will be both compared to themselves (pretest vs. posttests) as well as to a control group not exposed to the intervention. The relevant study materials will be included in their paper (physical) and electronic chart. Patients upon enrollment in the study will undergo an initial assessment that will include their baseline pain scores, narcotic consumption, incentive spirometry scores, and the subjective self-reported results of their questionnaire (the pre-test questionnaire- see attached). Patients will continue to be scored on objective (incentive spirometry results, opioid pain medicine consumption) and subjective variables (pain scores) during their hospital course. Between 24-48 hours after enrollment, they will be prompted to again complete a similar 2nd questionnaire post-test (if they are discharged from the hospital at this point in the time course, they will be sent home with the questionnaire and prompted to complete it at home). At their follow up appointment in trauma clinic (which will be coordinated by the research team to be as close as possible to 3 weeks post injury), they will have the opportunity to again voluntarily complete a final short questionnaires (post-test) that assess their pain control and respiratory function over the last 3 weeks. At this point, their involvement in the trial will be complete. Patients themselves will play an active role in data collection during the trial, and will be instructed and prompted in how to do so. Patients will be expected to fill out a worksheet on a daily basis, both while inpatient and after discharge, on their daily incentive spirometry scores as well as their minimum and maximum pain scale scores. This will be used to supplement the survey or questionnaire data, as well as the objective data from the electronic medical record. The investigators will ultimately compare groups using a quasi-experimental design as follows: Untreated control group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. This will allow for a direct comparison of patient to patient within the intervention arm (patient pretest result serving as control compared to posttest result) . To observe for temporal variability, their will be a control group with no intervention as well (no rib belt worn) , however the principle aim of the study is the comparison of patients to themselves in a pre-test, post-test fashion.
This is a pilot study to collect data to support a VA grant submission to study fMRI and neurophysiological predictors of hand function and recovery during a robotic intervention in people with hand impairments due to stroke or spinal cord injury.
Subjects who are having a lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care will be randomized to either a traditional landmark based lumbar puncture or ultrasound guided lumbar puncture. The primary objective of study is to compare the success rate of obtaining CSF using Ultrasound guided technique against the Traditional Landmark based approach. Secondary objectives are to evaluate factors influencing the success or failure, patient tolerance, and a safety assessment.