View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries, Traumatic.
Filter by:This is a pilot and feasibility study for a mobile phone-delivered intervention for memory, called MEMI (memory ecological momentary intervention), that was designed to support adults with chronic traumatic brain injury with their memory. The goal of the study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of MEMI and to assess preliminary efficacy as to whether technology-delivered spaced memory retrieval opportunities improve memory in people with and without a history of chronic traumatic brain injury.
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate a clinical tool to predict which adolescents aged 11 to less than 18 years of age with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are at an increased risk for developing significant new or worsening mental health conditions. The main aims the study wish to answer are: - Does the adolescent have new or worsening depression or anxiety defined as a change from their previous medical history using self-reported questionnaires at either one or three months post-injury? - Does the adolescent have unmet mental health care needs, defined as not receiving any mental or behavior health care in patients with new or worsening anxiety or depression as defined by the self reported questionnaires? Participants will be enrolled after being diagnosed in the emergency department (ED) with an mTBI. During the ED visit, the child's parent/caregiver and the adolescent will complete several questionnaires related to mental health which include tools to measure anxiety and depression. Participants will be asked to complete these questionnaires again at 1 month and 3 months post enrollment.
The purpose of this research, which has been determined as non-significant risk by the central IRB overseeing the study, is to obtain information to help further develop a machine (a medical device) to measure the pressure around the brain from the outside (this pressure is called intracranial pressure or ICP). Monitoring and managing ICP is an important part of care for patients with conditions such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). However, the current way of measuring ICP requires surgery to drill a hole into the skull, and therefore can introduce additional risks such as infections and pain. Recent research has shown it may be possible to measure ICP without needing surgery. This technology is in development, but large amounts of data is required to build these new devices. Through collecting a large database of information from patients who have both the routine surgical device and the research device applied to their head, the research team will work to develop and test an effective and potentially safer way of monitoring patient ICP.
The objective of this clinical study is to compare the outcomes of two neurosurgical interventions, Cisternostomy and Decompressive Craniectomy (DC), for the management of severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Severe TBI presents challenges in managing intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion, often requiring surgical intervention. DC involves the removal of a section of the skull to reduce ICP, while Cisternostomy, a technique rooted in microsurgery, aims to alleviate brain edema and lower ICP by creating additional space for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation. This prospective study will be conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized into Group A (DC) and Group B (Cisternostomy) following brain CT scans. Clinical evaluation will include regular follow-ups for 6 months post-surgery, recording data on GOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU, and hospital stays. Analysis will be performed using SPSS 24, comparing outcomes between groups using Chi-square test and t-test. A significance level of p≤0.05 will be applied. It is hypothesized that Cisternostomy, as an adjunct to traditional TBI management, will effectively reduce ICP, resulting in improved GOS and reduced complications postoperatively, including decreased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, with sustained improvement observed at 6 months
The goal of this randomised cross-over feasibility trial is to investigate two intensive robot-assisted training therapies in the early rehabilitation phase after traumatic brain injury and disorders of consciousness. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the protocol feasible concerning inclusion in the study? - Is the protocol feasible concerning protocol completion? Participants will randomly be assigned to either five days of robot-assisted gait training (GAIT), two days of pause, then five days of robot-assisted step training (STEP) or vice versa. The investigators will explore and compare safety events, physiological measures and physical activity levels, behavioural measures, and functional disability outcomes. Further, the investigators report intervention and technical parameters in detail.
A two site, 2-arm, Phase III randomized pragmatic clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of quetiapine monotherapy in comparison to Treatment As Usual (TAU) medication management for symptoms experienced by veterans receiving rehabilitation therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and comorbid symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury. This could potentially lead to improved treatment protocols and better outcomes for this vulnerable population.
This was a multicenter randomized controlled study of 98 severe Traumatic Brain Injury patients with tracheostomy. Patients enrolled were divided randomly into the observation group with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding or the control group with Nasogastric tube feeding for enteral nutrition support, respectively. Nutritional status, complications, decannulation of tracheostomy tubes and level of consciousness on day 1 and day 28 were recorded and compared.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore Clinical Effect of Myofascial Release Therapy in Dysphagic Traumatic Brain injured Survivors. The main question it aims to answer is: • Can Myofascial Release Therapy improve swallowing function in Traumatic Brain injured Survivors? Patients will be randomly allocated into the control group or the experimental group, all under rehabilitation treatment, the experimental group will be given Myofascial Release Therapy. The study lasts 21 days for each patient. Researchers will compare the Functional Oral Intake Scale, Penetration-Aspiration Scale, Swallowing Quality of Life to see if the Myofascial Release Therapy can help improve the situation.
Mild traumatic brain injury(mTBI) is a common cause of consultation to the emergency rooms worldwide and is the most common form of traumatic brain injury. Though classified as mild, as many as 40% of patients suffering mTBI do not make complete recoveries or present persistent symptoms. The present study is intended to determine long term outcome of patients suffering mTBI and to establish new prognostic models with the use of serum and saliva based biomarkers. For this purpose this study will not exclude patients regarding their comorbidities.