View clinical trials related to Stroke.
Filter by:Post-stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity is a challenge in neurorehabilitation. Selective training of different degrees of freedom (training of specific monoarticular movements and in one plane of movement of the upper extremity) to achieve true recovery could be a good approach. However, it is not known how the training should be structured to avoid interference between the different movements trained, hindering the motor learning process during neurorehabilitation. This research aims to determine the effect on performance and kinematic control of a selective movement control task during one- or three-days training of 2 different degrees of freedom, close or distant in cortical representation, of the upper extremity in people with early subacute and chronic phase of stroke. The hypothesis is that in the upper extremity of subacute or chronic phase stroke survivors, learning 1 target DoF is interfered by training another DoF of the same joint. In contrast, learning 1 DoF from a different, distant joint does not interfere with learning the target DoF in a training session. Likewise, this interference is diminished in multiple training sessions. On the other hand, in early post-stroke phase, within the first 5 weeks, the gain in kinematic control of each controlled DoF is greater than in later post-stroke phases (between 9 to 12 weeks of evolution or chronic phase). An experimental design of 4 days of training, of approximately 60 minutes per day, will be carried out in people who are within the first 3 months after a stroke or in a chronic stage. There will be 3 intervention groups that will train the shoulder flexion movement of the paretic upper extremity and another movement, which can be of the same affected upper extremity or another of the contralateral lower extremity.
The study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial, lasting for 15 days for each participant. Patients with post-stroke dysphagia who receive treatment at the Rehabilitation Department are selected as the study subjects. The patients are randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the placebo group. All patients receive routine rehabilitation therapy and swallowing rehabilitation training, along with enteral nutrition support using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube. In addition to these interventions, patients in the experimental group receive transcranial direct current stimulation, while the instruments used for patients in the placebo group only illuminate an indicator light without any actual effect.
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the psychological condition and experience of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare the psychological condition and experience of the two groups.
In this study, a multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective cohort study was conducted to observe the effect of Edaravone Dexborneol on the incidence and outcome of bleeding transformation after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. To explore the methods to reduce the dilemma of bleeding transformation after thrombolysis, and to dynamically detect the changes of the main links causing bleeding transformation such as blood-brain barrier damage, local immune response activation and so on. To explore the mechanism of Edaravone Dexborneol in reducing bleeding transformation. It is proved that Edaravone Dexborneol combined with thrombolytic therapy can reduce the risk of bleeding and transformation after thrombolysis and improve the safety of thrombolysis. Secondly, it can improve the early recanalization rate of ischemic stroke patients after thrombolytic therapy, and effectively protect the integrity of the blood-brain barrier.
The goal of this study is to determine the effect of the ENHANCE intervention in improving clinical outcomes and evaluating the effects of the intervention on implementation processes and outcomes. The specific questions it aims to answer are: 1. To test and estimate the effect of the intervention in people with MLTCs attending PHCs on: i. Detection of, and initiation of treatment for, additional chronic conditions ii. Treatment intensification and changes in medication iii. Control of chronic conditions iv. patient reported health-related quality of life and functioning v. health care utilisation and adherence vi. costs of health care 2. To use the RE-AIM framework to assess implementation processes and outcomes through measurements of reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. 3. To understand implementation processes and outcomes within the wider context of primary healthcare, provide explanations for the observed effects of the clinical findings and identify recommendations for wider implementation of the ENHANCE intervention. The participants in the control group will receive usual care at their primary health care facility, which includes the use of the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) or Adult Primary Care (APC) clinical decision support tool. Participants in the intervention group will receive care for their multiple chronic condition by a clinician trained to use the ENHANCE clinical decision support tool (intervention tool), and receive two CHW visits in their home to provide treatment literacy and adherence support.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test a gait (walking) training program in non-ambulatory (unable to walk) chronic stroke survivors. The main question it aims to answer is: • Will gait training improve the cardiovascular system in non-ambulatory chronic stroke survivors better than a sitting leg cycling exercise? Participants will walk on a treadmill with a partial body-weight support system and the gait training device. Researchers will compare with a leg-cycling exercise to see if there are significant differences in resting heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and A1c levels in the blood.
The goal of this clinical trial is to comparing the efficacies of different managements in patients with overactive bladder symptoms with stroke The main question it aims to answer are: - Are pelvic floor training exercises and bladder training enough to ease the symptoms of overactive bladder in patients with stroke? - Is tibial nerve stimulation really effective and does it decrease the need of medications in patients with overactive bladder with stroke? Participants are questioned if they have the symptoms of overactive bladder. After urodynamic evaluation, they are separated in 2 groups. Pelvic floor training exercises and bladder training are given in both groups; while one of the groups is followed with tibial nerve stimulation and the other one is followed with sham tibial nerve stimulation for 6 weeks. Our main aim was to compare effectiveness of tibial nerve stimulation in patiens with overactive bladder with stroke.
Patients and their families all agreed .
Ischemic stroke, the most prevalent neurological disorder, is treated with medication and thrombectomy but with limited success, especially in chronic stages where traditional rehabilitation is the primary option. Stroke often leads to post-stroke autonomic imbalance, deteriorating functional outcomes and increasing recurrence risk. Emerging non-pharmacological treatments like Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and Focused Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) offer new possibilities. VNS targets post-stroke tissue injury and promotes healing and neurogenesis, while tDCS aims to enhance motor learning by rebalancing brain activity. Both therapies seek to improve outcomes in both acute and chronic stroke stages.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate upper-extremity vibrotactile stimulation with wearables in stroke patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: Are the wearables well-tolerated by patients? Does the vibrotactile stimulation help regain arm function? Participants will wear vibrotactile stimulation gloves and shirts for 5 hours daily during their stay at the rehabilitation unit, in addition to conventional therapy. Researchers will compare the treatment group (vibrotactile stimulation wearables) with a control group (conventional therapy only) to see the effects of the vibrotactile stimulation.