View clinical trials related to Heart Failure.
Filter by:Preventing heart failure (HF) deterioration is a great challenge for contemporary medicine. The progress course of HF is with increasing frequency of subsequent hospitalizations (approximately 30% of hospitalizations are the repeated ones). It is estimated that the costs of hospital stays constitute nearly 2/3 of healthcare costs provided for HF patients. The difficulty in treatment of patients with HF deterioration is associated with numerous comorbidities and coexisting complications (i.e. aggravation of ischaemic heart disease, lung diseases, infections, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, renal failure as well as operations, in particular emergency ones). Our study is aimed to evaluation the complex pathophysiological background related to heart failure deterioration with respect to the effect of applied in-hospital treatment.
What is heart failure with normal ejection fraction? The heart contracts (pumps) and relaxes with each heartbeat. In some people with heart failure, the heart contracts normally but there is reduced relaxation of the heart. As a result, people notice a feeling of breathlessness, ankle swelling and fatigue especially on exertion. The investigators feel that patients with reduced or impaired relaxation of the heart have less heart filling time and poor energy utilisation during exercise. Therefore, the investigators are conducting a study to more thoroughly understand the disease condition by giving a drug called ivabradine to reduce the heart rate and hence to increase the heart filling time in these patients.
To study the hypothesis that treating patients with underlying diastolic dysfunction with oral Kuvan® (BH4, also known as tetrahydrobiopterin) in addition to current best practices will improve metabolic and echocardiographic diastolic function parameters.
Cardiac resynchronization is a recommended therapy for patients with advanced heart failure, under optimized medical treatment with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and prolonged QRS, nevertheless, still 30% of the population do not respond to standard biventricular implantation. Non-response can be explained by a combination of factors including sub-optimal patient selection, placement of the pacing lead over a zone of slow conduction, insufficient correction of mechanical dyssynchrony including sub-optimal lead implantation. Few data distinguish true non-responders from patients in which effective resynchronization was not delivered through standard biventricular implantation. Triple-site cardiac resynchronization pacing (stimulation at three ventricular sites) has been proposed to improve synchrony and thus the response rate in (Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy) CRT recipients.
The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters of a novel furosemide formulation administered subcutaneously as compared to oral furosemide.
This is an observational study of the functional capacity of patients with Heart failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) who are admitted to the hospital for routine medical treatment.
The purpose of this study is to investigate if "optimal electrical resynchronization" achieved by targeting left ventricular lead placement to the myocardial region with the latest electrical activation combined with post-implant pacemakersettings for narrowing the paced QRS width causes an excess improvement in the pumping function of the heart (the left ventricular ejection fraction) in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is growing rapidly among people dying from end-stage heart failure who are unable to get a heart transplant. These patients elect to live out the remainder of their lives dependent on a partial artificial heart—so-called destination therapy (DT). Although patients may live longer with a DT LVAD, it poses many risks, including stroke, serious infection, and bleeding. Most of these patients have other medical problems that are not fixed by the DT LVAD. Patients must be connected to electricity at all times. A caregiver is required, which often places stress on loved ones. Therefore, the decision whether or not to get a DT LVAD is often an extremely difficult one. Unfortunately, our research shows problems with the way this medical decision is currently being made in hospitals across the United States. Hospitals that offer DT LVAD treatment do not follow a standard process. The forms, pamphlets, websites, and videos used to help patients and families are biased and too difficult for most people to understand. Lastly, this is an emotional and even scary decision for most patients and their families, but the process does not help them deal with these feelings. Using feedback from patients, caregivers, clinicians, the study team made a paper and video decision aid to help people who are offered DT LVAD make this most difficult of decisions. Unlike the information that is now available, our decision aid focuses on options, fears, and the needs of caregivers, is balanced, and is paired with training for doctors and nurses on how to best talk about DT LVAD. The investigators now propose to test the effectiveness and implementation of this intervention. The investigators will apply the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluative framework to a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial across 6 medical centers. Aim 1. Evaluate the Reach and Effectiveness of the DT LVAD shared decision support intervention to improve patient and caregiver experiences. Hypothesis 1a: The intervention will reach 90% of eligible patients. Hypothesis 1b: Post-implementation, patients and caregivers will have improved decision quality (greater knowledge and higher value-treatment concordance). Aim 2. Assess the Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the DT LVAD shared decision support intervention across multiple providers and settings. Hypothesis 2: The intervention will be: adopted by key personnel; implemented consistently; and maintained after trial completion.
BIOWOMEN is a study designed to compare the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) response rate in a Heart Failure (HF) population with an equal distribution of men and women. Different clinical variables will be collected (QRSd, Left Bundle Brunch Block (LBBB), HF etiology…) and compared in order to demonstrate that women may respond even better than men.
Beta-blockers should be administered to all patients with heart failure stage II to IV according to NYHA.Beta-blockers reduce mortality and hospitalizations and improve the operational phase for all categories of patients with heart failure. Since beta-blockers, only carvedilol, metoprolol, bisoprolol and recently nevimpololi have shown these benefits and so, only they have evidence to be provided. Eplerenone is indicated, in addition to conventional therapy, for reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in stable patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 40%) and clinically proven heart failure after recent myocardial infarction.