Clinical Trials Logo

Coronary Artery Disease clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Coronary Artery Disease.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01485081 Completed - Coronary Disease Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy Study of the DANUBIO Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon in Side Branches of de Novo Bifurcation Lesions (DEBSIDE)

DEBSIDE
Start date: May 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Danubio Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon for the treatment of side branches of de novo bifurcation lesions in native coronary arteries.

NCT ID: NCT01482169 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Intravenous Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Adenoscan® for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Start date: March 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that intravenous regadenoson is equivalent to intravenous Adenoscan® for the physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions.

NCT ID: NCT01478126 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Effects of Glutamine in Ischemic Heart Disease Patients Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether perioperative glutamine administration possess protective properties on internal organs (heart and gut) in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, operated under cardiopulmonary bypass.

NCT ID: NCT01478100 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Virtual Coronary Intervention and Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Start date: October 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The investigators examined the feasibility of treatment planning using virtual coronary revascularization and fractional flow reserve (FFR) CT before the invasive procedures.

NCT ID: NCT01477151 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery

RISCCS
Start date: November 2011
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Anesthesia practice in the 21st century is increasingly outcomes-oriented and evidence-based, but there remain significant gaps in our knowledge, even for commonly-encountered clinical situations. Currently, the two most commonly used drugs used for maintenance of anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients are isoflurane and sevoflurane. There is a belief among many cardiac anesthesiologists that sevoflurane is a better cardiac anesthetic than isoflurane, but there is very little data to support this notion. In fact, very little is known about their comparative effects on important patient outcomes because there has not been a large head-to-head prospective randomized clinical trial. This project will supply the data necessary to critically compare the two anesthetics.

NCT ID: NCT01476995 Completed - Hypertension Clinical Trials

Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView

GBMC
Start date: September 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The objective of this study is to determine whether the finger tip images captured by the EPIC ClearView device, when analyzed via the ClearView software, produce a Response Scale that characterizes trends consistent with known diagnoses identified by medical doctors. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that the organ system involving any of a series of known active diagnoses will be identified in the EPIC ClearView Response Scale report with the intention of providing potential triage capabilities.

NCT ID: NCT01472705 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Everolimus- Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comers

EverBio
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study sought to investigate safety and efficacy of biolimus-eluting stents (BES) with biodegradable polymer as compared with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with durable polymer through 3 years of follow-up.

NCT ID: NCT01471522 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)

ISCHEMIA
Start date: July 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. A blinded coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) was performed in most participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 to identify and exclude participants with either significant unprotected left main disease (≥50% stenosis) or those without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all major coronary arteries). Of 8518 participants enrolled, those that had insufficient ischemia, ineligible anatomy demonstrated on CCTA or another exclusion criterion, did not go on to randomization. Eligible participants were then assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization, if feasible, plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT. SPECIFIC AIMS A. Primary Aim The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization followed by optimal revascularization, if feasible, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure in participants with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia over an average follow-up of approximately 3.5 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for failure of OMT. B. Secondary Aims Secondary aims are to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared to a conservative strategy will improve: 1) the composite of CV death or MI; 2) angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire; 3) all-cause mortality; 4) net clinical benefit assessed by including stroke in the primary and secondary composite endpoints; and 5) individual components of the composite endpoints. Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Coronary CT Angiogram Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III per NIH Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III per NIH Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III per NIH

NCT ID: NCT01470274 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Safety of the CO-rebreathing Method in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and COPD Patients

Start date: November 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The primary objective is to establish the safety of the CO-rebreathing method for measuring total blood and plasma volume in CAD patients. The working hypothesis is that the CO-rebreathing method is safe in use with coronary artery disease patients and that it does not cause myocardial ischemia or cardiovascular damage.

NCT ID: NCT01468675 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Health Information Technology (HIT) Enhanced Family History Documentation and Management in Primary Care

Start date: February 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Growing evidence and understanding of an inherited component to several common, chronic diseases has led to an increase in the importance of information about family health history, and the integration of this information with other risk factors for common diseases, like lifestyle risk factors. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends the use of family health history as a routine genetic screening test for common diseases, as obtaining a complete family health history is the first step to identifying patients who are in need of intervention (e.g., intensive screening, lifestyle modification, preventative therapies, genetic counseling). The importance of integrating family health history with an individual's medical record will increase as our understanding of the genome evolves because it will be more essential to put detailed personal genetic information into a clinical context. Because of limited time during a typical primary care visit, and the concerns of primary care providers (PCPs) about their self-efficacy of estimating and providing guidance about risk, PCPs frequently do not obtain a family health history or provide individualized risk assessment. These issues highlight the need to leverage technology to collect these data independent of clinic visits, yet have these data interoperate with an individual's electronic health record (EHR). Telephonic interactive voice response systems (IVRS) and self-administered web-based tools are a low-cost, sustainable way of reaching out to primary care populations, independent of a visit. We propose to develop, implement, and evaluate a patient-reported, EHR-integrated personalized risk assessment module to provide tailored disease risk and risk reduction information. The Specific Aims of the proposed project are to: Aim 1: Develop a patient-reported, EHR-integrated, personalized risk assessment module to provide tailored disease risk and risk reduction information for four common diseases (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, coronary heart disease, and type II diabetes) for the patient and his/ her PCP. Aim 2: Measure the reach and effectiveness of this integrated risk assessment module by conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of adult primary care patients in the Brigham and Women's Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network. Aim 3: Evaluate facilitators and barriers to the adoption and implementation of this integrated risk assessment module. This project will further our understanding of how technology can be used to fill a gap in current clinical practice by facilitating the systematic collection of family health history and lifestyle risk factor data and integrating these data with an individual's EHR to personalize care in a variety of settings and for diverse patient populations. This work will use current national data standards for interoperability, and lessons learned from this project will be exportable to healthcare settings throughout the United States.