Clinical Trials Logo

Coronary Artery Disease clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Coronary Artery Disease.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01489449 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Heart Disease

Bare Metal Stent Versus Drug Coated Balloon With Provisional Stenting in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

PEPCADNSTEMI
Start date: December 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the present trial is to assess the efficacy of the standalone use of SeQuent(R) Please coated balloon compared to a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with NSTEMI.

NCT ID: NCT01489202 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Effects of DES Platforms on Markers of Endothelial Damage and Inflammation

PLATFORM
Start date: September 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting may induce endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammatory reactions, which in turn delay healing and endothelialization and may lead to restenosis and atherosclerosis within the stented segments. Drugs and polymers are considered the protagonists of these pathophysiologic processes whereas the role of stent platforms remains poorly defined.It remains unknown, conversely, if stent platforms affect the extent of post-PCI endothelial damage and inflammation.

NCT ID: NCT01489176 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Regadenoson Real Time Perfusion Imaging Trial-Optison

Start date: July 31, 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose if this study is to examine how effective Regadenoson is in detecting coronary artery disease during a stress echocardiogram when Optison is administered. Optison is a contrast agent that improves the images of the heart on the echocardiogram (echo) machine. Optison is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to use during stress echocardiograms. Regadenoson is a commercially available rapid acting stress agent that is used to chemically increase the heart rate and is approved for nuclear imaging tests. Regadenoson is a FDA approved drug but not for the intended use in this study.

NCT ID: NCT01488084 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Assessing Vein Graft Properties Between Conventional & No-Touch Harvesting Technique - (PATENT SVG)

Start date: June 2010
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare saphenous veins harvested using the atraumatic pedicled ("no-touch") technique to saphenous veins harvested using the conventional open technique in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Investigators will compare the biological structure of the saphenous veins harvested using these two techniques. There is some evidence that saphenous veins harvested using the "no-touch" technique may allow for better patency up to 8 years following bypass surgery. We may be able to detect early differences in vascular structure, observed at the time of conduit harvest.

NCT ID: NCT01486030 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Effect of Exercise Stress Testing on Peripheral Gene Expression Using Corus CAD (or ASGES) Diagnostic Test

EXERCISE
Start date: September 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a prospective, single-center study that aims to evaluate the acute and delayed effect of exercise stress testing on the peripheral gene expression (PGE) levels using a predefined gene set established in the Corus CAD (Age/Sex/Gene Expression score - ASGES) test in subject with known obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and in control subjects (without known CAD).

NCT ID: NCT01485081 Completed - Coronary Disease Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy Study of the DANUBIO Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon in Side Branches of de Novo Bifurcation Lesions (DEBSIDE)

DEBSIDE
Start date: May 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Danubio Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon for the treatment of side branches of de novo bifurcation lesions in native coronary arteries.

NCT ID: NCT01482169 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Intravenous Regadenoson Versus Intravenous Adenoscan® for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Start date: March 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that intravenous regadenoson is equivalent to intravenous Adenoscan® for the physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions.

NCT ID: NCT01478126 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Effects of Glutamine in Ischemic Heart Disease Patients Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether perioperative glutamine administration possess protective properties on internal organs (heart and gut) in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, operated under cardiopulmonary bypass.

NCT ID: NCT01478100 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Virtual Coronary Intervention and Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Start date: October 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The investigators examined the feasibility of treatment planning using virtual coronary revascularization and fractional flow reserve (FFR) CT before the invasive procedures.

NCT ID: NCT01477151 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery

RISCCS
Start date: November 2011
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Anesthesia practice in the 21st century is increasingly outcomes-oriented and evidence-based, but there remain significant gaps in our knowledge, even for commonly-encountered clinical situations. Currently, the two most commonly used drugs used for maintenance of anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients are isoflurane and sevoflurane. There is a belief among many cardiac anesthesiologists that sevoflurane is a better cardiac anesthetic than isoflurane, but there is very little data to support this notion. In fact, very little is known about their comparative effects on important patient outcomes because there has not been a large head-to-head prospective randomized clinical trial. This project will supply the data necessary to critically compare the two anesthetics.