View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:This research project has 2 parts: The first part of the research is to develop a couples-based group mindfulness intervention for men undergoing prostatectomy, with input from patients and their partners. The second part is the trial registered here, which will pilot the researchers' mindfulness intervention, developed in part 1, and observe any reduction of distress for men undergoing prostatectomy and their partners.
This is an open label, non-randomized, Phase I, dose escalation/dose expansion study in cohorts of patients with metastatic CRPC at Screening. Dose escalation uses a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Once the MTD is defined, the dose expansion phase is used to define the recommended phase 2 dose.
This dose-escalating phase I trial assesses for the first time the safety, the side effects and the harmlessness, as well as the therapeutical benefit of the new study drug UniCAR02-T-pPSMA in patients with progressive disease after standard systemic therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancers with positive PSMA marker. The UniCAR02-T-pPSMA drug is a combination of a cellular component (UniCAR02-T) with a recombinant antibody derivative (TMpPSMA) which together forms the active drug.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new ultrasound technique. This technique may provide additional and improved information about the stiffness and sizes of the internal structures of your prostate in order to improve the guidance for a targeted biopsy. The investigational, custom-designed probe and needle guide will be used to produce images of your prostate and provide guidance for up to 4 additional biopsy samples (cores) prior to a standard magnetic resonance (MR) ultrasound fusion biopsy procedure. Above the time required for the MR ultrasound fusion biopsy, this study will take up to 30 additional minutes of time for collection of the investigational device guided collection of biopsy samples Risks of participation include increased time under anesthesia (to collect additional biopsies) and slight heating of tissue.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of CYH33 in combination with olaprib in patients with DDR gene mutations and/or PIK3CA mutations, in patients who have progressed on prior PARP inhibitor, and in patients with recurrent high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are platinum resistant or refractory. The study will assess if this combination will optimize anti-tumor activity, block tumor growth and overcome the resistance to PARP inhibitor treatment. The study consists 2 parts. In Part 1 dose escalation, the objective is to determine the maximum toleration dose (MTD) of the combination. The final recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CYH33 in combination with olaparib will be based on the totality of an overall assessment of available safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy which could be the MTD or a dose level lower in specific cohorts of patients. In Part 2 dose expansion, the main objective is to evaluate the efficacy at RP2D.
At the time of study termination, NUV-422-02 was a first-in-human, open-label, Phase 1 dose escalation study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NUV-422. The study population comprised adults with recurrent or refractory high-grade gliomas (HGGs), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with and without brain metastases, and recurrent or refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). All patients self-administered NUV-422 orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
The majority of all new prostate cancer cases are diagnosed in men aged > 70 years, with the highest incidence in men aged > 90 years. Management options for localized prostate cancer include active surveillance in patients with low-risk disease, radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. In previous studies, hypofractionated prostate cancer irradiation regimens have been shown to represent a highly effective treatment option for prostate cancer. However, patients aged 75 years or older were underrepresented in most trials resulting in the lack of a robust evidence base. The proposed study will evaluate radiation-induced toxicity as well as outcome after hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients aged 75 years or older.
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the safety, determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assess preliminary clinical activity of GEN1044 in patients with solid tumors.
Our hypothesis is that the doxorubicin eluting-beads currently used in hepato-oncology might be applicable to high-grade prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. The primary objective of this Phase IIa pilot study is to evaluate the safety of performing prostate embolization with doxorubicin eluting-beads according to different loading doses. Four dose levels will be tested: doxorubicin-free beads to test the effect of embolization alone, 2.5 mg of doxorubicin (1/20 of the dose administered for liver cancers), 5 mg and 10 mg of doxorubicin. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the tolerance (functionnal questionaries at D0, D14 M1 and M3; collection of complications at D1, D5, D14, M1, M3; MRI at D14), evaluate the systemic diffusion of doxorubicin (doxorubinemia at D1), evaluate an early anti-tumor effect of the treatment (via a prostate-specific antigen test at D14 M1, M3 and magnetic resonance imaging at D14), describe the distribution of beads observed on the surgical specimen and evaluate the dose effect at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (via a prostate-specific antigen test at D14, M1, M3 and magnetic resonance imaging at D14).
This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, cross-over trial assessing patient preference for apalutamide versus enzalutamide in 146 male patients with recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The primary objective is to investigate whether there is any difference in patient preference between apalutamide and enzalutamide in patients with recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.