View clinical trials related to Stroke.
Filter by:Community-based exercise programs have demonstrated potential for implementation in older adults; however, it remains imperative to ascertain whether this strategy will yield comparable benefit in stroke patients with dysphagia.Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Patients in the intervention group received swallowing function training in community public spaces for 5 days every week for four-week period (60 minutes per day). Patients in the control group received no intervention. Penetration-Aspiration Scale and Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale-15), and meal duration were assessed before and after all the treatment.
The purpose of this research, which has been determined as non-significant risk by the central IRB overseeing the study, is to obtain information to help further develop a machine (a medical device) to measure the pressure around the brain from the outside (this pressure is called intracranial pressure or ICP). Monitoring and managing ICP is an important part of care for patients with conditions such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). However, the current way of measuring ICP requires surgery to drill a hole into the skull, and therefore can introduce additional risks such as infections and pain. Recent research has shown it may be possible to measure ICP without needing surgery. This technology is in development, but large amounts of data is required to build these new devices. Through collecting a large database of information from patients who have both the routine surgical device and the research device applied to their head, the research team will work to develop and test an effective and potentially safer way of monitoring patient ICP.
This trial aims to demonstrate that the Neuralert Monitoring System will detect strokes before they would be identified by current standard of care. Each patient will be monitored for up to five days, depending on device connectivity or battery duration. Each monitoring session will consist of wearing a Neuralert device on each arm. For this pilot trial, we are interested in learning about Wi-Fi connectivity, successful data transmission, clinical usability, and tolerability.
The efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in acute ischemic stroke patients with large infarct cores (ASPECTS score < 6) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion have not been clearly established. This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate early combination therapy with methylprednisolone for reperfusion in acute large core infarction.
Title: The Effect of Vibrating Splint on Hand Function After Stroke Summary: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a vibrating splint in improving hand function and reducing spasticity among individuals who have experienced a stroke. Stroke is a major global health issue, often resulting in long-term disability and impairments in the upper limbs. Spasticity, a common complication of stroke, causes stiffness and involuntary muscle contractions, leading to difficulties in performing daily activities. Current treatment options for spasticity include medications and physical therapy techniques. However, these approaches may have limitations in terms of effectiveness and duration of benefits. Therefore, non-pharmacological interventions are being explored to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. The hypothesis of this study is that the use of a vibrating splint, which applies mechanical vibrations to the hand muscles, will decrease spasticity and improve hand functionality in individuals with chronic stroke. The vibrations from the splint stimulate the sensory receptors in the skin and muscles, leading to muscle relaxation and improved motor control. The study will be conducted as a pilot randomized controlled trial, involving participants who meet specific eligibility criteria. The participants will be divided into three arms, with each arm receiving a different intervention. Outcome measures, including assessments of spasticity, range of motion, pain levels, and functional abilities, will be collected before and after the intervention period. The findings from this study will contribute to the understanding of non-pharmacological approaches in managing spasticity and improving hand function after stroke. If the vibrating splint proves to be effective, it could offer a safe and accessible option for stroke survivors to enhance their recovery and regain independence in daily activities. This research is essential as it addresses the need for more effective interventions for spasticity management and hand rehabilitation after stroke. By providing valuable insights into the potential benefits of the vibrating splint, this study has the potential to improve the quality of life for individuals who have experienced a stroke and empower them to regain control over their hand movements.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, numerous options for oral anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF is consistently under-prescribed. In a pair of observational cohort analyses within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) health system, prescription of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF was less frequent in ambulatory clinic patients than in those who were hospitalized at the time of assessment (46.9% vs. 57.2%). Two single academic medical center randomized controlled trials demonstrated success for increasing adherence to guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in AF. To address the feasibility and impact of a computerized decision support (CDS) strategy in the non-tertiary care, community medical center setting, this study will involve a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial of a more sophisticated CDS focused not only on implementation stroke prevention but also on bleeding risk assessment and management.
A stroke happens when blood flow to the brain is stopped and the brain gets damaged. At least half of people with a stroke have fatigue months and even years later. A lot of people report fatigue as one of the worst symptoms post stroke that can affect daily activities and the length and quality of life. Though all the reasons for fatigue after stroke and how to best treat it are not fully understood, the investigators think that fatigue results from the stroke changing the brain, reducing physical fitness, and decreasing muscle strength. A stroke can also affect sleep and mood, which can impact how people feel too. It is also not known why women experience more fatigue than men after a stroke. Some studies have tested a drug called Modafinil for post stroke fatigue, while other studies have tested exercise for it. Yet, there is unclear evidence for either treatment, so this study has two main aims: 1. Test if Exercise Program One is better than Exercise Program Two 2. Test if Modafinil is better than a Sugar Pill As another aim, the investigators will also look at if combining Modafinil with exercise has any benefits. This study will take place at 6 Canadian research sites to give a good representation of people after a stroke. Each person will be tested on fatigue, mood, fitness, thinking skills, sleep, and usual activity levels. Participants will be assigned at random (like flipping a coin) to 1 of 4 groups: 1. Sugar Pill plus Exercise Program One 2. Sugar Pill plus Exercise Program Two 3. Modafinil plus Exercise Program One 4. Modafinil plus Exercise Program Two The treatment will last 8 weeks. The Modafinil or Sugar Pill will be taken once a day. The exercise will be delivered virtually by a trained therapist over computer to people at home 3 times a week. Change in fatigue, quality of life, and other outcomes will be measured over 6 months. The investigators will assess the results to identify the best treatment for post stroke fatigue and hope to be able to find a treatment that will help reduce fatigue and improve quality of life after a stroke.
The goal of this observational study is to look at differences in brain blood flow before and after management of risk factors such as high blood pressure and diabetes in patients with lacunar stroke. Participants will be asked to undergo a simple brain blood flow assessment at their initial appointment, whereby they will be asked to sit and stand twice. The patients will then be asked for a follow-up assessment 4 weeks after, identical to the first. This will allow us to look at any changes in brain blood flow from before management of risk factors and 4 weeks after management of risk factors.
Stroke is causing 6.6 million deaths and is a major cause of disability worldwide in 2019. There remains an urgent need for interventions that improve outcomes which can be implemented with wide applicability for stroke. ACT-GLOBAL is a multi-factorial, multi-arm, multi-stage, randomised, global adaptive platform trial for stroke, aiming to identify the treatment/s associated with the highest chance of improving outcome in stroke patients. In ACT-GLOBAL multiple questions will be evaluated simultaneously and sequentially as data accrues and can evaluate interactions between different treatment options.
Several clinical trials have produced variable conclusions regarding the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering in post-EVT acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients. Although two trials indicate harm from very intensive target-based treatment (SBP <130 mmHg), the others neutral effects in the SBP range 140-160 mmHg. The ENCHANTED3/MT domain of the ACT-GLOBAL platform trial aims to test different approaches to the treatment of elevated SBP in post-EVT AIS patients to find an optimal BP management strategy. ENCHANTED3/MT will randomize (1:1:1) up to 2,000 patients with SBP ≥150 mmHg post-EVT to conservative (no or minimal SBP reduction by 5-10mmHg or a target of 175-180mmHg if very-high baseline SBP [≥180mmHg]), moderate (SBP reduction by 10-20mmHg or a target of 160 ± 5, whichever is higher; no control if low-high baseline SBP [150-160mmHg]), or intensive (SBP reduction by 30-50mmHg or a target of 140±5 mmHg, whichever is higher) BP management.