View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:This is an open-label, randomized, parallel group two-stage phase 1-2 study with an escalation and an expansion component. This study will evaluate an extended-release (ER) formulation of onapristone in patients with prostate cancer in which Progesterone Receptor (PR) may be contributing to tumor progression. A companion diagnostic to select patients whose prostate cancer expresses the activated form of the PR (APR) is under development and will be implemented in this study; it may be used to further enrich the selection of the population based upon ongoing review of the results. Patients will be treated until occurrence of an intolerable safety issue, treatment failure, if patient elects to withdraw, or for non-compliance with either protocol-specified evaluations or onapristone treatment. An additional cohort of patients will be included at the recommended phase 2 dose to gain additional understanding of the onapristone safety profile and potential anti-cancer activity.
Prostate Cancer (PC) affects 1 in 7 men. Nearly half of those diagnosed with PC will receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as part of their treatment. ADT is good at managing PC but has many side effects. Researchers have shown that exercise, specifically one-on-one supervised exercise improves many of the side effects of ADT. However, exercise programs for men on ADT are not widely available. More questions need to be answered in order for exercise programs to become part of PC treatment. First, can programs that require fewer resources, such as group-exercise or home-based exercise, also improve ADT side-effects? Second, do exercise-related benefits continue beyond the structured exercise program? And what makes people continue exercising? Third, which exercise program is most cost-effective? In this study, the investigators will compare: (a) group supervised in-centre; (b) home-based supported; and (c) 1:1 supervised in-centre exercise programs to see which program is most effective for men with PC on ADT. The investigators will also look at what motivates people to continue to exercise both during a structured program and after the program is complete and will examine which exercise program is most cost-effective. The investigators will ask men with PC on ADT that are being treated at either Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto or the Tom Baker Cancer Centre in Calgary to participate in the study. When a patient agrees to participate, he will be randomly placed in 1 of the 3 exercise programs. All programs will include the same type of exercises (aerobic, resistance and flexibility) and all participants will exercise 4-5 days per week for 30 minutes per day (as tolerated) for the length of the program (6 months). The investigators will look at how men with PC on ADT respond to the exercise program by measuring quality of life (QOL), fatigue and different physical measures before, during, and after the exercise program. Although the investigators know that supervised one-on-one exercise is most effective at improving ADT side-effects, it is unknown if other forms of exercise are just as beneficial and more financially responsible. This study will allow the investigators to begin to answer these questions so that structured exercise programs become a regular part of PC treatment.
RATIONALE: Radical prostatectomy is surgery to remove the entire prostate. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays or other types of radiation to kill tumor cells. Sometimes the tumor may not need treatment until it progresses. In this case, active surveillance may be sufficient. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for localized prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying active monitoring to see how well it works compared with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy in treating patients with localized prostate cancer.
This is a phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 2 strategies to improve bone health in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
The purpose of this study is to determine the tolerability profile of OPB-111001 and to determine the most suitable dose of OPB-111001 in patients with advanced cancer
To evaluate the effect of MCS® compared with placebo in reducing the risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer in high-risk subjects after 104 weeks (24 months) of treatment.
This study intents to provide an initial evaluation of the utility of positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging measures for the prediction of immunological response to Sipuleucel T (SipT) therapy.
Robot assisted prostatectomy reduces the patients' postoperative pain and leads to rapid rehabilitation. But pneumoperitoneum affects the kidney. The increase of stress hormone reduces the glomerular filtration and the vaso-contraction of renal vessels leads the renal ischemia. Remifentanil is analgesics coupled with μ opioid receptor. In high dose of remifentanil, it is associated with κ and δ receptors, which leads to renal protection effect in animal study. Also, remifentanil infusion during anesthesia showed a diuretic effect. The purpose of this study is to investigate the remifentanil effect on renal function during robot assisted prostatectomy.
This study is being proposed to evaluate the use of moderate hypofractionated proton therapy in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. Quality of life outcomes as well as gastrointestinal and genitourinary early and late toxicities will be analyzed and compared to conventional proton therapy regimens. It is thought that this regimen will produce comparable findings and would result in substantial health care cost savings, as well as, be more convenient for patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the chemopreventive properties of capsaicin, the active compound in chili peppers, in prostate cancer patients enrolled in the active surveillance program or patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy.