View clinical trials related to Pain.
Filter by:A pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers comparing two formulations of paracetamol fast release in fasted state.
This pilot clinical trial studies stress reduction in improving quality of life in patients with recurrent gynecologic or breast cancer. Participating in a stress reduction program may help improve quality of life in patients with gynecologic or breast cancer.
In our previous study, NCT01631695, we proposed and clinically evaluated the Medasense pain response index, PRI, in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery. Note: the name PRI has been changed to NoL (Nociception Level) Index. The PRI is based on a non-linear combination of several pain-related physiological parameters into a one unique index (0-100). In this study we aim to validate the performance of the PRI by: 1. investigating the patient's PRI response to surgical painful stimuli under different levels of analgesia: - Investigating patient's PRI response to surgical painful stimuli under two different levels of Remifentanil Target Control Infusion (TCI) rates. - Investigating patient's PRI response to standardized painful stimulus (Tetanic stimulus) with and without opioids. 2. investigating the effect of beta-blockers on PRI performance in patients taking chronic beta-blocker treatment. The study is based on recording and analyzing the subject's physiological signals, while recording painful events, medication dosing and different clinical signs.
To compare the two surgical options in their short-term and long term outcomes in the management of early left-sided colorectal cancers. The hypothesis is that the incisionless approach will result in less postoperative pain and wound related complications.
This study has two purposes. One is to determine if daily sulindac decreases breast density; a risk factor for breast cancer development. The second is to determine whether sulindac reduces pain and stiffness associated with regular use of aromatase inhibitors given for the treatment of breast cancer.
The purpose of this study is to compare the pain level felt by patients when receiving placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter (IV line) following the administration of a local anesthetic. The local anesthetics tested will be lidocaine, buffered lidocaine, and bacteriostatic normal saline. Lidocaine is commonly used as a premedication for reducing the pain upon insertion of peripheral IV lines. However, due to its acidic nature, the lidocaine itself may cause pain upon administration. To help counter this discomfort, pharmacies can "buffer" the lidocaine using sodium bicarbonate, which increases the pH to a neutral value, resulting in less pain. Bacteriostatic normal saline has also been used for local anesthesia with peripheral IV placement, particularly in patients with a lidocaine allergy, as it contains benzyl alcohol which acts as a local anesthetic. There are minimal reports from the literature that directly compare patient reported pain of all three agents to one another, although studies do exist that have compared buffered lidocaine versus lidocaine and buffered lidocaine versus bacteriostatic normal saline. To address this comparison gap, the following research questions need to be asked: which anesthetic agent is the superior premedication for reducing the amount of pain upon administration of the local anesthetic itself and for the pain associated with the peripheral insertion of the catheter? The hypothesis of the investigators is that there is not a significant difference in the degree of pain scales between the anesthetic agents to justify the pharmacoeconomic costs associated with compounding buffered lidocaine. The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter. A secondary outcome includes a pharmacoeconomic analysis that will look specifically at the cost-savings of using one agent over the other and will take into account the daily time allocated to pharmacy technicians and pharmacists for compounding and verifying buffered lidocaine.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the bioequivalence of two 30-mg hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets and one 60-mg hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablet.
Pain is the most common presenting symptom in medical outpatients, and depression and anxiety are the two most common mental disorders. All three conditions are often inadequately treated and result in substantial disability, reduced health-related quality of life, and increased health care costs and utilization. Additionally, pain, anxiety, and depression (PAD) are frequently comorbid with one another and have reciprocal negative effects on treatment response and additive effects on adverse health outcomes. The PAD triad is especially burdensome in Veterans, with their high prevalence of chronic pain, depression, PTSD, and other anxiety disorders. The Comprehensive vs. Assisted Management of Mood and Physical Symptoms (CAMMPS) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial designed to test the relative effectiveness of a lower-resource vs. a higher-resource enhancement of usual primary care in the management of Veterans suffering from with pain plus comorbid anxiety and/or depression.
Individuals will be recruited by posted advertisements in the waiting rooms of the PCP offices and by physician referral. After an initial phone screen, research staff will meet with interested individuals in their PCP offices for informed consent, baseline interview and randomization. Participants will be randomized into a Health Education study arm, and receive 7 individual sessions on general health education, or an Intervention study arm, and receive 7 individual sessions of the Treating Opioid Patients' Pain and Sadness (TOPPS) intervention.
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 5% medicated plaster in localized chronic post-operative neuropathic pain in comparison to placebo plaster.