View clinical trials related to Pain, Postoperative.
Filter by:Pediatric inguinal hernia repair (IHR) candidates experiences ordinarily mild to moderate pain, rarely severe pain in the postoperative period. Caudal epidural block (CEB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) are two effective postoperative analgesia options. In this randomized study, it is aimed to compare the effects of CEB and TAPB on postoperative pain scores, additional analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence, procedural complications, family and surgeon satisfaction, length of hospital stay, chronic pain development in pediatric bilateral open IHR.
Bariatric surgery effectively produces weight loss and reduces obesity-related comorbidities. Although it is mostly performed with minimally invasive techniques, the patients may still suffer from moderate-to-severe pain immediately after surgery [1]. Opioids remain the first choice for multimodal analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Providing analgesia after bariatric surgery might be challenging due to a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and the increased sensitivity to respiratory depression triggered by opioid overuse after surgeryThe most common plane block techniques utilized during laparoscopic bariatric surgery are transversus abdominis plane block (TAP), rectus sheath block (RB), the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the external oblique intercostal block (EOI). In this study, we have evaluated the auxiliary benefit of these various techniques in reduction of the postoperative in bariatric surgery. patients who had laparoscopic bariatric surgery at VKV American Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively.
The purpose of this study is to test protocols being developed for the conduct of a large sale multi-site clinical trial which will compare opioids to non-opioids for managing post-surgical impacted 3rd molar extraction pain.
BACKGROUND: Some studies have revealed that intravenous dexmedetomidine and esketamine alleviated postoperative pain and improve the quality of recovery after surgery. The investigators investigated whether co-administration dexmedetomidine and esketamine could better alleviated postoperative pain and improve the the quality of recovery after modified radical mastectomy. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five women with elective modified radical mastectomy were randomly divided into 3 groups: Patients in group D received dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia), and then dexmedetomidine was infused at a rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h until 20 min before the end of operation. Patients in group DE1 received a bolus infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) and esketamine (0.5 mg/kg)over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia, and then dexmedetomidine were infused at a rate of 0.4 µg/kg/h and 2 µg/kg/min until 20 min before the end of operation, respectively. Patients in group DE2 received received a bolus infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) and esketamine (0.5 mg/kg)over 10 min before the induction of anesthesia, and then dexmedetomidine were infused at a rate of 0.4 µg/kg/h and 4 µg/kg/min until 20 min before the end of operation, respectively. Primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR-15) at 1 day after sugery and 3 day after sugery. The secondary outcomes included perioperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative VAS pain scores, side effects such as the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and bradycardia, hallucination, nightmare, as well as postoperative rescue analgesics and anti-emetics, recovery time, and extubation time.
Background Pain after cardiac surgery is both multifocal and multifactorial. Sternotomy, sternal retraction, internal mammary dissection, posterior rib dislocation or fracture, possible brachial plexus injury, and mediastinal and pleural drains contribute to pain experienced in the immediate postoperative period. Ineffective pain management can cause systemic and pulmonary complications and significant cardiac consequences. Methods This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of regional anesthesia techniques for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery patients at our clinic. The effects of analgesic methods, in terms of contributing to recovery, have been examined.
This is a prospective randomized study that included 60 patients and was divided into two equal groups of patients who were scheduled for LC, Ages 18 and 60 years, both sexes, ASA I-II and BMI 19 - 39. Group A received 30 ml levobupivacaine (0.25%) plus 3 mg morphine intraperitoneal at the site of surgery in the bed of the gallbladder via the navel port with the patient in a Trendelenburg position, Group B received 30 ml levobupivacaine (0.25%) plus 50 mg/kg magnesium sulfate in the same pattern as in the A group.
Ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIP)was first described in 2015 by Hand et al which also target the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves as they pass through the paraspinal musculature(between the multifidus muscle (MF) and the longissimus muscle (LG)). The block was performed bilaterally at the level of L3 and they reported a reproducible area of anesthesia to pinprick in a mean (SD) area covering 137.4 (71.0) cm2 of the lower back (including the midline) after 20 minutes of the block. This procedure has subsequently been modified by Ueshima H et al in 2016 by targeting the injection in the plane between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles (mTLIP) which helps avoiding the spread of local anesthetics to the ventral ramus and neuraxial space, thus, the modified TLIP block is considered to be a more refined version of the original TLIP block and safer and easier to perform. There are limited number of studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of mTLIP block however, no previous study has demonstrated the ideal local anesthetic volume for this block in lumber spine surgery. Moreover, this technique is considered new regional anesthetic techniques and so both of them should be involved in further studies, on the other hand the comparison between both of them at the same study wasn't discussed before, and so we will proceed at this study.
Patients of breast surgery dated between April 2016 and March 2021 will be scanned in three groups; solely induced general anesthesia, general anesthesia induced with Erector Spinae Plane Block, and general anesthesia induced with Rhomboid Block. The investigators aimed to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of regional anesthesia techniques used in the clinic for postoperative recovery and opioid consumption in patients who underwent breast surgery.
Approximately 1 in 5 women who undergo CS will experience severe acute postoperative pain. The severity of pain in the acute postoperative period is a significant predictor for the development of chronic pain, which occurs in 9.2%-18% of women who undergo CS. Furthermore, severe acute post-cesarean pain triples a woman's risk of developing postpartum depression and negatively affects breastfeeding and infant care. For these reasons, it is imperative to provide adequate postoperative analgesia in this patient population
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, and controlled trial was to compare the efficacy of single-shot spinal analgesia to typical conventional treatments (continuous epidural analgesia and spinal-epidural combination) in reducing labor pain, particularly in multiparous women. we will enroll in each of the three groups(S group= single-shot Spinal group), (E group= Continuous Epidural), and (C group = combined spinal-epidural) women in advanced active labor and fulfill inclusion criteria.