View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder.
Filter by:The CLIMATE-II Observational Study examines to what extent chronically ill patients experience adverse health effects because of heat and whether the patients' specific health behavior, somatosensory amplification, risk and benefit perception, self-efficacy, health literacy, degree of urbanisation of the patients' administration district and characteristics of the patients' neighborhood are associated with these effects.
The current study is a pilot for the GRF project entitled "Predicting illness trajectories in fully remitted major depression using concurrent TBS/fNIRS". The project aims to determine whether immediate prefrontal excitability modulated by intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is altered in remitted major depressive disorder (rMDD) and therefore classifies as a potential trait marker to predict the incidence of recurrence. In the present cross-sectional study, we will recruit four clusters of population, including patients diagnosed with rMDD, currently depressed patients with varying numbers of episodes, healthy subjects, and never-depressed healthy subjects with elevated risk for MDD (defined as having a first-degree relative with a history of depression), to investigate the relationship between the number of prior episodes, cognitive function, and TBS-induced instantaneous brain activity change in the presumed neuropathological prefrontal cortex (PFC).
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an FDA-approved therapy for treatment resistant depression (TRD) that involves brief magnetic stimulation pulses on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) brain region. But studies of rTMS alone show remission rates of ~30%. Additionally, rTMS has not been shown to improve cognitive functioning that may be an independent factor predicting treatment success. This study will develop a novel multimodal treatment, which combines intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) - a type of rTMS with digital mindfulness training to engage brain plasticity, enhance cognition and alleviate depression symptoms in individuals with TRD.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvant intervention based on a peer support program in the reduction of depressive symptomatology versus an online intervention in people with major depression in Primary Care Mental Health Units in Mallorca. Design: Randomized clinical trial of two branches in a Mental Health Unit of Mallorca, where one branch will receive an adjuvant intervention based on a peer support program (Active Patient Program) and another branch (control) will receive information and exercises aimed at improving their mental health through the COGITO App, designed and validated for this purpose. Scope and study subjects: The scope of the study will be the consultations of the Mental Health Unit (MHU) of Primary Care in Mallorca. The study subjects will be patients of these units who meet the criteria for Major Depression. The mental health professionals of the MHU will be in charge of recruiting participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The required sample will be 70 subjects, 35 in each branch. Variables: The main dependent variable is depressive symptomatology, measured through the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). As secondary variables, quality of life and adherence to treatment will be included. Data analysis: All analyses will be carried out using the SPSS statistical program. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be performed. The efficacy of the intervention (reduction of depressive symptoms (BDI-II)) will be assessed by a general linear model (ANOVA) at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months, adjusted for baseline values.
This study aims to investigate the effects of a 12-week aerobic (cardio) exercise intervention in people with Major Depressive Disorder. Measurements taken before, during, and following the 12-week intervention will include assessments of cognition, cardiorespiratory fitness, stress, mood and emotion, and gut bacteria.
DECIDE- Deep phenotyping for clinical inferring response in treatment resistant depression -Study Building upon the "Biobanking" initiative at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, the present project aims to identify clinically relevant subtypes of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) through Clinical Deep Phenotyping (CDP). According to clinical trials, 30-40% of the patients suffering from TRD benefit from lithium treatment. By collecting multimodal biological and clinical-diagnostic markers, such as structural and functional brain imaging via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brain signals from electroencephalography, comprehensive blood tests, assessment of perception and cognition through neuropsychological testing, as well as the evaluation of specific depression symptoms and psychological and other comorbidities using standardized questionnaires, a bio-clinical signature will be identified using multivariate machine learning algorithms as an integration method. This signature aims to predict the response to lithium therapy in TRD. Prospectively, such an algorithm could later personalize the treatment decision of 'lithium administration in TRD'. This concept is in line with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIH) and aims to offer lithium therapy as a personalized treatment strategy for TRD. Specifically, this means that the likelihood of treatment response can be estimated before administration based on the results of the present study, thus enabling lithium to be offered specifically to those patients who are likely to benefit from it. The study design is non-interventional, meaning the decision for lithium treatment is made for patients according to clinical routine in accordance with the recommendation of the German National Treatment Guideline (NVL) independent of study enrollment. Study participation does not influence treatment decisions for the patients.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in 2018 as a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Hospitals worldwide use it to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). It is safe, effective, even for depressed patients unable to respond to standard pharmacological treatment and is more efficient than standard rTMS. In accordance with the approved treatment protocol, patients experience considerable sensory discomfort at a stimulation intensity of 120% of their resting motor threshold (rMT). Antidepressant effects of iTBS are believed to be mediated by modulating prefrontal excitability. There is still a lack of evidence to support the choice of 120% rMT as the optimal stimulation intensity, and the presumed superiority of higher stimulation intensities over lower intensities has yet to be proven. This knowledge gap has clinical implications since more tolerated treatments may lead to greater adherence, resulting in improved outcomes. The current study proposes a randomized, triple-arm, controlled trial to compare the efficacy of iTBS at 75% (iTBS75) and 120% (iTBS120) rMT with sham iTBS (SiTBS). Based on the following considerations, SiTBS was selected to be compared with iTBS75 and iTBS120: SiTBS will reveal placebo antidepressant effects and serve as a control. iTBS75 is selected because iTBS at 80% aMT exhibits significant excitatory effects on the motor cortex and corresponds to approximately 70% rMT. There is however, a distance of about 12.7mm between the coil and the motor cortex, whereas 14.4mm separates the coil from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Accordingly, a resting motor threshold of 70% at the motor cortex corresponds to a distance-adjusted rMT of 75% at the DLPFC. Lastly, iTBS120 is chosen as the standard stimulation intensity in current iTBS depression trials. It is our intention to investigate the potential antidepressant effects of iTBS treatment at a much lower stimulation intensity than the one currently employed by most centers in the United States and approved in these centers. Thus, our study can contribute to establishing a treatment regimen with increased adherence and lower withdrawal rates.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the pharmacodynamic effects of ALTO-203 in patients with MDD in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose crossover treatment period. Additionally, safety, tolerability, and PK will be assessed in a subsequent randomized placebo-controlled multi-dose parallel-group treatment period of 28 days. Participants will complete subjective response questionnaires and perform cognitive tasks during the single-dose period, in which participants will receive ALTO-203 25 μg and 75 μg, as well as placebo. During the multiple-dose period, participants will receive either ALTO-203 25 μg, 75 μg , or placebo. Safety will be assessed over the single dose and 28-day multiple dose periods.
The goal of this trial to test if a web-based psychoeducation will work in improving depression help-seeking intention and behavior among antenatal women with probable depression in Eswatini. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does the web-based psychoeducation improve depression help-seeking intention and help-seeking behavior in antenatal women with probable depressive symptoms? Researchers will compare this web-based psychoeducation to a waitlist control, to see if the program works in improving depression help-seeking intention and behavior during pregnancy. - The psychoeducation program will have a total of 4 sessions, which will be given to participants over a two-week period. two sessions will be delivered each week. - Participants will be asked questions before the intervention starts, immediately the intervention ends as well as after a month of completing the intervention.
The demand for prevention and treatment of adolescent depression has rapidly increased over years. A national project to improve treatment of adolescent depression in primary care has taken place in Finland starting 2020. The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to describe pathways to mental health services in adolescents with depressive symptoms. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Do young people reporting depressive symptoms have equal access to treatment? - How is it best to recognize those adolescents who will benefit from IPC-A? Adolescents who participate in the study will - complete a survey on protective and risk factors of depression three times over 6 months - report possible depressive symptoms every two weeks over 6 months - report whether they needed and received help, motivation for treatment, and benefits and harms from treatment We will also collect - information from one of caretakers with two surveys within 6 month- intervals on their view on adolescent's need for support, strengths and risks, and benefits and harms from treatment where applicable - where applicable, from the professional who provided support after the intervention on their training and competence, as well as content of and response to treatment - register data to estimate overall provision and cost of social welfare and health care services one year preceding the study and over 2 to 10 years after the observation period Researchers will compare an intervention that is new in Finland, adolescent interpersonal counseling (IPC-A), to other treatments of depression, to see if it is equal to or better than other treatments of depression.