View clinical trials related to Coronary Artery Disease.
Filter by:The present study sought to explore the predictive value of radial wall strain (RWS, derived solely from angiograms) for coronary artery lesion progression compared with lesion vulnerability assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The lesion progression at 1 year was defined as an increase of ≥20% in diameter stenosis based on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) evaluation.
Coronary angiography-derived FFR assessment (AngioQFA) is a novel technique for physiological lesion assessment based on 3-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and virtual hyperemic flow derived from contrast frame count without drug-induced hyperemia. The goal of this prospective, multicenter trial is to compare the diagnostic performance of AngioQFA with invasive FFR as the reference standard. The secondary purpose is to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) using wire-based IMR as the reference standard.
Chronic angina pectoris refractory to medical and revascularization therapies is a disabling medical condition and a major public health problem. Patients with refractory angina have limited treatment options. One proposed therapy modality is transcatheter implantation of a reduction stent in the coronary sinus. Coronary sinus reduction stents have been shown to reduce angina burden considerably and to improve quality of life. The reduction stent is assumed to increase myocardial perfusion and reduce myocardial ischemia, but the mechanism of action is poorly understood. The aim of this project is to assess the myocardial ischemia burden in patients with refractory angina who are undergoing a transcatheter coronary sinus reducer procedure. This is a clinical non-randomized self-controlled cohort study with blinded outcome adjudication for changes in myocardial perfusion. Patients with refractory angina will be systematically examined before implantation of the coronary sinus reduction stent and after 6 months. The primary outcome, changes in myocardial perfusion on the gold standard 15O-H2O PET/CT will be evaluated on blinded perfusion scans where the stent is invisible. To provide context to the findings, we will also evaluate whether changes in myocardial ischemia are associated with less angina and better cardiac function parameters. Effects of stent implantation on angina symptoms and quality of life could be affected by a placebo effect. Treatment options for patients with refractory angina is needed, and results from the present study will explore if coronary sinus reduction stents are improving myocardial ischemia in this patient group. Signs of improved objective perfusion will inspire confidence in the method.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the clinical and technical performance of the VRS100 system with disposable surgical kit in the delivery and manipulation of coronary guidewires and stent/balloon systems for use in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg Once Daily) with no specific intervention in selected elderly patients (60-80 years old) with residual inflammatory risk (hs-CRP≥ 2mg/L) and multivessel coronary artery disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether the intervention is effective in reducing ischemic events - Whether the intervention is effective in reducing inflammatory biomarkers' level - Whether the intervention is safe for elderly patients Participants will be randomized to receive low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg Once Daily) or no specific intervention for one year. Patients enrolled should complete one-year follow-up in the form of clinic visit or telephone call.
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Balloon Catheters Swide® (3µg/mm2 balloon surface area) in the treatment of Chinese patients with native coronary heart disease and small vessel lesions（reference diameters from 2.0mm to 2.75 mm） in comparison with Paclitaxel-Releasing Coronary Balloon Catheter SeQuent® please Neo
Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) has emerged as a favorable technique over traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a select group of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Till date, multiple individual studies comparing HCR with CABG have been carried out, but no data on the potential impact of sex on the outcome of HCR exist. To fill this knowledge gap, the investigators aim to perform an international collaborative multi-center study in order to examine gender differences in short-term and long-term outcomes among patients who underwent HCR or CABG.
The purpose of this study is (1) to determine whether 24-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is superior to 12-month DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) with respect to major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] levels (>30mg/dL); (2) to determine whether 24-month DAPT is non-inferior to 12-month DAPT after PCI with DES with respect to net adverse clinical events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3 or 5 bleeding) in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels (>30mg/dL).
This study evaluates the short-term and long-term patency of the radial artery and the No-touch vein in patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A total of at least 774 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG will be consecutively recruited from Fuwai Hospital and randomly assigned to receive radial artery or No-touch saphenous vein as their second graft. All participants will be invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months and 12 months post-operatively.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two guiding catheters in patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic). The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Aren't the safety of medical devices inferior to each other? - Aren't the efficacyof medical devices inferior to each other? Participants will be randomized (1:1) and have a percutaneous coronary interventionwith one of the two guiding catheters.