View clinical trials related to Healthy.
Filter by:The goal of this study is the multimodal exploration via eyetracking, MRI and EEG data of ocular movements and the corresponding brain activation during ecologic visual stimulation in the healthy population.
Fascia is a connective tissue that contains a large amount of water and contains blood vessels, nerves that surround the muscles and connect the various structures of the body. In the event of an injury, the fascia has to cause some limitations to reduce muscle spasms, neuromuscular changes and pain. In order to achieve this, it can adhere to muscles and other body structures. In the physically active population, these facial adhesions may cause a decrease in performance over time, while the body heals itself after mechanical stresses and injuries. It is remarkable that various facial techniques are tried and compared with each other in order to increase performance. The most noteworthy of these techniques is foam roller (FR) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM). As well as myofascial techniques, a preferred and highly studied method for performance improvement, especially before competitions, is dynamic stretching. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of these three techniques on vertical jump performance and their advantages over each other.
People suffering from chronic pain exhibit changes in the way the central nervous system processes pain. Some of the changes in the central nervous system are associated with how the brain adapts to the process of different stimuli. There are several physiological mechanisms that regulates how the brain adapts to changes and one of these mechanisms is called homeostatic plasticity (or equilibrium plasticity ). In healthy participants homeostatic plasticity mechanisms have been tested and considered normal, whereas in patients with chronic conditions, such as low back pain, this mechanism was shown to be dysfunctional. However, it is unknown when this difference in the pain system develops. It is possible that homeostatic mechanism becomes impaired over a period of time. Current studies have investigate a cohort of patients and there is a lack of longitudinal designs. In order to investigate the long-term effects of pain on homeostatic plasticity mechanisms it is important to first investigate the reliability of the methods. This study will investigate the reliability of two protocols of homeostatic plasticity induction.
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability Between Fixed-Dose Combination and Co-Administration of HGP0904, HGP0608 and HCP1306 Tablets in Healthy Male Subjects
A clinical study to measure the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of OP-101 After Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Volunteers
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a painless,non-invasive means of increasing brain excitability. It has been used for several years and in many populations to improve physical and psychological outcomes. Although many tDCS devices are capable of a range of stimulation intensities (e.g., 0 mA - 5 mA), the intensities currently employed in most tDCS research are ≤ 2 mA, which are sufficient to elicit measurable improvements; but, these improvements might be expanded at higher intensities. In the beginning, when the safety of tDCS was still being established for human subjects, careful and moderate approaches to stimulation protocols were warranted. However, recent work using stimulation at higher intensities, i.e. up to 4 mA, has been performed in many populations and was found to have no additional negative side-effects. Now that the safety of tDCS at higher intensities is better established, work exploring the differences in performance between moderate (i.e. 2 mA) and higher (i.e. 4 mA) intensities is necessary to determine if increasing intensity increases the effectiveness of the desired outcome. Prospective participants will include 40 healthy young adults (all right-side dominant) that will be recruited to complete four randomly ordered stimulation sessions (Baseline, 2 mA, 4 mA, and sham), separated by at least 5 days. Each session will involve one visit to the Integrative Neurophysiology Laboratory (INPL) and will last for approximately one hour. We expect data collection to last 6 months. The first session includes leg strength measurements and fatigue tasks of both legs, as well as a baseline 6 min walk test (6MWT) to determine fatigued walking characteristics. The following three sessions will include performing a random tDCS condition (2 mA, 4 mA, or sham) over the brain area that controls the participant's dominant leg for 15 minutes prior to and then throughout the duration of the fatigue task of the dominant leg (16-20 min total stimulation time). The fatigue task for the nondominant leg will be performed after a 10 minute energy recovery period. After the fatigue task has been completed for both legs, the participants will perform the 6MWT.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the adhesion performance of ZTlido® (lidocaine topical system) 1.8% compared to adhesion performance for Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) and Versatis® (lidocaine medicated plaster 5%).
An open label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, single-dose study evaluating the product adhesion in healthy, adult subjects using ZTlido 1.8% Topical System and a generic Lidocaine Patch 5%
This is an open-label, randomized, single center, 2-treatment, 3-period, 3-sequence reference-replicated, crossover trial in healthy subjects to compare the PK of glepaglutide (ZP1848) after a single SC administration by vial/syringe and by autoinjector.
Aim of the study is to investigate the impact of hesperidin and/or vitamin C on elevated uric acid concentrations.