View clinical trials related to Coronary Artery Disease.
Filter by:Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis for which single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) is indicated if patients are stable. Recently dual pathway inhibition (DPI) by combining a low-dose factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban2.5mg twice daily) with a single platelet inhibitor (ASA) has been demonstrated to be beneficial in treating CAD. The exact mechanisms underlying the benefits of DPI, are not completely understood. CAD is characterised by a state of chronic low-grade inflammation, where monocytes from CAD patients have a higher immune responsiveness to ex vivo stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared to healthy matched controls. Surprisingly, the investigators have recently observed an elevation in ex vivo immune responsiveness to LPS stimulation when switching from ASA monotherapy to DPI of ASA combined with rivaroxaban inpatients with peripheral arterial disease (n=11; unpublished). Remarkably this was associated with no changes in systemic inflammation, as determined by Olink proteomics analysis. These findings suggest that factor Xa inhibitors can enhance immune cell responsiveness despite being clinically beneficial to CAD. The exact mechanisms contributing to the observed increased immune responsiveness remain unexplored.
METHOD is a prospective observational program that will be conducted in 1centre of the Russian Federation. Prospective follow-up will be for about 6 months. The METHOD study is a 2 visit study with first visit of inclusion and second visit of completion of the study. Patients with stable angina pectoris eligible to the study inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this observational program. The parameters for analysis will be collected by doctors and entered into CRF. The final analysis will include data from patients who were taking TMZ 80 mg OD during the observational period. The decision to stop the study will be made once 36 patients receiving treatment with trimetazidine 80 mg OD will have been evaluated at V1. It is expected that 5 cardiologists will participate in the program. The planned number of patients is 36.
This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. AccuFFRangio (ArteryFlow Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis by computing the pressure in the vessel based on angiographic images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic implications of AccuFFRangio in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Coronary restenosis has been one of the main reasons affecting the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduces the restenosis rate; however, the incidence of restenosis is still about 10%. The late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). DCB angioplasty has the following advantages compared with DES implantation: Firstly, the drug in DCB is uniformly distributed and released; whereas the drug release of DES via stent platform is uneven -85% of the vascular wall is not covered by the stent strut. Secondly, there is no alloy in the vessel after DCB angioplasty, while the coronary stent platform and polymer might cause temporal or persistent inflammatory response leading to intimal hyperplasia. Finally, there is no metal cage restraining vessel motion after DCB, the physiological function of coronary arteries would be maintained. Studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. The application of DCB in large vessels with de novo lesions is still to be investigated. The DEBUT study showed that in high bleeding risk patients aimed using only 1-month DAPT, DCB was superior to BMS in terms of MACE [MACE (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or revascularization of ischemia-reperfusion target lesions)] at 9-month follow-up. However, there is still a lack of evidence comparing the DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. The current study aims to investigate if in patients undergoing PCI for de novo stenoses in large vessels, DCB is non-inferior to DES.
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is intended to relieve myocardial ischemia by improving blood flow in the epicardial coronary arteries. However, the efficacy of PCI may be compromised by incidental microvascular obstruction and peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PPMI), which occurs in about 10-15% of cases and is associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The mechanism of PPMI is thought to be related to side branch occlusion, coronary artery dissection and acute microvascular damage caused by embolization of plaque debris during the PCI and is more frequently seen in calcified coronary artery disease. Calcium modification by rotational atherectomy (RA) results in peri-procedural myocardial infarction in 24% of cases and myocardial injury in 70% of cases. The Shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) balloon catheter emits sonic pressure waves in a circumferential field causing the selective fracture of calcium, altering vessel compliance and permitting further expansion of the vessel wall. This provides a potentially safer alternative to other calcium-modifying devices since there is a low risk of dissection and perforation. It is also proposed that this IVL device reduces the risk of atheromatous embolization, which would reduce the risk of PPMI and microvascular dysfunction. The SONAR Trial is a pilot study measuring peri-procedural myocardial injury, PPMI and microvascular dysfunction in patients (with calcified coronary artery lesions not responding to usual balloon dilatation) randomized to RA or Shockwave IVL. The primary outcome is peri-procedural myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes include peri-procedural myocardial injury, acute microvascular dysfunction, procedural success, and procedural costs.
A prospective analytic study to evaluate the incidence, clinical and laboratory characteristics, extent of coronary artery disease and short-term outcome of newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in patients with first-time diagnosed coronary artery disease treated in Saud Al Babtain Cardiac Center.
A prospective, multi-center, single-blinded, randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System (IBS) in treating patients with coronary artery disease compared to the Abbott Vascular XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE).
A prospective, multi-center, single-arm trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System (IBS) in treating patients with coronary artery disease.
ULTRA is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry, enrolling consecutive patients treated with ultrathin coronary DES (coronary stent with strut thickness < 70 um) for coronary bifurcation lesions, left main disease, chronic total coronary occlusion, and in-stent restenosis regardless of their clinical presentation. Target lesion failure (TLF a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis) will be the primary end point, while its single components will be the secondary ones along with all-cause death, all acute myocardial infarction (excluding peri-procedural AMI), target vessel revascularization and BARC major bleedings (BARC 3-5). Due to the retrospective, observational nature of the registry, no formal sample size estimation is required. Patients complying with detailed inclusion criteria and with a minimum follow up of 6 months will be enrolled.
VT ablation is a frequently performed intervention in patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, electrical storm due to monomorphic VT and appropriate ICD shocks, primarily aiming at reducing the burden of complaints, and ICD shocks. The recommendations for its use were described in the ESC guideline for ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. To visualize the arrhythmogenic substrate leading to ventricular tachycardia complex mapping techniques are currently used in clinical routine, including conventional Point-by-Point mapping or Multielectrode Mapping. The latter is associated with shorter Mapping and overall procedure times, while maintaining the same primary endpoint of the procedure itself. The aim of this trial is to validate, whether the reduction of mapping and procedure time is associated with a comparable long-term outcome compared with conventional Point-by-Point mapping.