View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:This study is designed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CEDM) in predicting early neoadjuvant therapy response and pathologic complete response (pCR) compared to mammography. Patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer with available mammography and ultrasound imaging are eligible for the study. Eligible patients will be imaged at baseline (before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy), early (2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy) and late (after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) timepoints with mammography. CEDM will be done within 2 weeks of the specified timepoint. Additionally, a survey of subject experience with CEDM and other pre-operative imaging will be collected after CEDM is performed.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of CYH33 in combination with olaprib in patients with DDR gene mutations and/or PIK3CA mutations, in patients who have progressed on prior PARP inhibitor, and in patients with recurrent high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are platinum resistant or refractory. The study will assess if this combination will optimize anti-tumor activity, block tumor growth and overcome the resistance to PARP inhibitor treatment. The study consists 2 parts. In Part 1 dose escalation, the objective is to determine the maximum toleration dose (MTD) of the combination. The final recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CYH33 in combination with olaparib will be based on the totality of an overall assessment of available safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy which could be the MTD or a dose level lower in specific cohorts of patients. In Part 2 dose expansion, the main objective is to evaluate the efficacy at RP2D.
The overall aim of this research is to assess the feasibility of a 12-week combined aerobic exercise (AEx) and resistance exercise (REx) intervention and elucidate the impact of AEx/REx on several physiological and behavioral components of energy balance among breast cancer survivors (BCS).
The goal of the study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a supervised, online-delivered, individualized, physical activity program in a sample of post-active treatment breast cancer survivors. The proposed intervention will use a 2-arm randomized controlled trial study design to compare a 12-week resistance-based physical activity program to an attention control (i.e., printed individualized physical activity program) group on feasibility, acceptability and changes in strength as measured by 10 repetition maximum (10RM). Both groups will wear accelerometers. The main hypothesis is that participants randomized to the intervention arm will rate the online-delivered physical activity program as feasible and acceptable compared to attention control participants. The overall rationale is that delivering a physical activity intervention online may increase uptake of the intervention, which may lead to maintained physical activity behavior and associated health benefits. The primary outcomes are feasibility as measured by participant retention and acceptability as measured by adherence to physical activity program (recorded by physical activity log). Secondary outcomes include changes in strength as measured by 10RM, objectively measured physical activity levels as measured by the accelerometer, satisfaction, physical functioning and health-related quality of life. Additionally, a select number of participants will be invited for an interview to talk about their experiences in the program, motivation and barriers to exercise. Interview description: Participants will complete one-on-one interviews with the PI or research staff over videoconferencing software (Rutgers Zoom). The interview will be 45 to 60 minutes in duration and audio recorded using the "record meeting" function. Prior to the interview, participants will consent to being audio recorded. The recording will be stored on Box (a HIPAA compliant cloud drive). A transcript of the audio will be generated using the "audio transcript" function on Rutgers Zoom and transcribed by a third party to ensure accuracy.
At the time of study termination, NUV-422-02 was a first-in-human, open-label, Phase 1 dose escalation study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NUV-422. The study population comprised adults with recurrent or refractory high-grade gliomas (HGGs), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with and without brain metastases, and recurrent or refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). All patients self-administered NUV-422 orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
The purpose of the study is identify the dose(s) of infigratinib to use in combination with tamoxifen to treat patients with a particular type of advanced breast cancer (hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, FGFR-altered breast cancer)
The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and effectiveness of Intrarosa®, also known as Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and prasterone. By doing this study, the investigators hope to learn if Intrarosa® can improve vaginal discomfort. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups. One group will use Intrarosa® once a day. The other group will use Replens™ two times a week.
Primary Objective: To determine whether Amcenestrant (SAR439859) in combination with palbociclib improves progression free survival (PFS) when compared with letrozole in combination with palbociclib in participants with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who have not received any prior systemic anticancer therapies for advanced disease. Secondary Objective: - To compare the overall survival in both treatment arms. - To evaluate the objective response rate in both treatment arms. - To evaluate the duration of response in both treatment arms. - To evaluate the clinical benefit rate in both treatment arms. - To evaluate progression-free survival on next line of therapy. - To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant, and palbociclib. - To evaluate health-related quality of life in both treatment arms. - To evaluate the time to first chemotherapy in both treatment arms. - To evaluate safety in both treatment arms.
Evaluate the impact of coaching sessions on the return to work rate (number of patients returning at work / total number of patients per arm) 6 months after inclusion in the study for breast cancer in professionnally active patients.
HR+/HER2-negative BC represent ∼70% of all newly diagnosed breast tumours and are responsible for most recurrences and deaths due to this disease, and despite available standard therapies, ∼15-20% of hormone tumours recur at distant sites. As BC is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease, intrincsic subtype may play an important role in classifying patients. In this case, HER2-E subtype is present in approximately 6.6-11.0% of HR+/HER2-negative tumors and might express either HER2, estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR), we also know that HER2-E is present twice as much in metastatic tumors compared to primary tumors and that HER2-E patients may benefit in terms of PFS form an anti-HER2 drug as was showed using retrospective sample in EGF30008 trial. Therefore, incorporation of novel drugs in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) can improve patient outcomes in HR+/HER2-negative BC advanced disease specially in those with HER2-E subtype. Methods NEREA is an open-label, single arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating treatment with neratinib in combination with ET in pre and post-menopausal women and men with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-enriched (HER2-E), HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous ET (either aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen or fulvestrant) in the adjuvant setting or to treat advanced disease or both. The study will follow a Simon's 2-stage design with one interim and one final efficacy analysis. The primary objective will is assess the efficacy of neratinib in combination with ET is this group of patients, efficacy will be measured as Progression-Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) defined as the proportion of patients alive and without progression, locally assessed by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1 at 24 weeks after first treatment administration, imaging evaluation will be performed every 8 weeks for the first 12 months following treatment start, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Secondary endpoints include Clinical Benefit Rate at 6 months , Overall Response rate, Duration of response, Time to response and Incidence, duration and severity of Adverse Events. The interim analysis will be conducted when 33 patients are evaluable for the primary endpoint having the potential for at least 3 'on treatment' disease assessment scans. If less than 15 patients achieved a PFS6, the trial will be terminated for futility in favor of the null hypothesis. If more than 28 patients achieved a PFS6, the trial will be stopped in favor of the alternative hypothesis demonstrating activity. If none of the two above-mentioned conditions are attain, up to a further 23 patients may be evaluated, for at least a total of 56 evaluable patients. Therefore, if a total of 28 or more patients achieved a PFS6 at the end of the second stage, then the null will be rejected in favor of the alternative. Eligible patients will receive neratinib 240 mg every day in combination with ET, with either exemestane, fulvestrant or tamoxifen: exemestane 25 mg every day orally, tamoxifen 20mg every day orally or fulvestrant 500 mg administered in two intramuscular injections of 250 mg each at C1D15 and at D1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle at investigator discretion. LHRH agonist will be used in men and premenopausal women if no oophorectomy has been performed previously. All patients will take prophylactic loperamide with a stablished doses scheme during the firs cycle and on demand in subsequent cycles