View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:Breast cancer is one of the most worrisome health concerns facing women. Early detection and active patient monitoring are crucial to survival. The chances of a cure are high when detected and treated in the early stages. Standard breast cancer diagnostic methods such as mammography, ultrasound, and MRI have limitations such as ionizing radiation, high false-positive rates, and/or high expenses. Medical Thermography might overcome these limitations: It is a non-invasive , adjunctive physiologic imaging technology that uses a high-resolution infrared camera and computer processing to produce an image (thermogram) of a patient's skin surface temperatures. It is a non-contact screening method, which does not involve radiation exposure or invasive procedures, and is safe for both the patient and the trained personnel performing the screening. While mammography and ultrasound depend primarily on structural and anatomical variation of the tumor from the surrounding breast tissue, thermography detects pathophysiological changes within the breast such as metabolic and vascular changes caused by cancer. The heat transfer in the body is conducted by the circulatory system; hence, pathologies identified by thermography are generally associated with changes in blood perfusion. To date, there has been no completed or ongoing large-scale, prospective, multicenter, international study that evaluates the diagnostic performance of thermal video streams coupled with advanced Artificial Intelligence algorithms for early-stage breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The proposed study will be crucial for the development of a new imaging modality that aims to be both cost-effective and to carry a minimal level of risk, facilitating screening of women of all age groups and breast densities, enabling early detection of abnormalities caused by malignant processes and improving patient monitoring.
There is little scientific data concerning the use of negative pressure therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. That strategy of treatment-reconstruction has expanded increasingly since the last years. The current literature reports only 3 studies on the use of preventive negative pressure therapy in oncologic breast surgery. Moreover, all three are retrospective, case-control studies with serious limitations. The largest published series reports a reduction in the overall complication rate from 15.9% to 8.5%, and a significant reduction in several criteria: infection, scar dehiscence and necrosis. However, the study presents significant biases, with non-comparable populations in terms of comorbidities, surgical procedure performed, inclusion periods (and therefore experience in performing oncological surgery). There was also a high probability of under-assessment or postponement of post-operative complications, which is typical of published retrospective surgical studies. The published results therefore strongly encourage further investigation of negative pressure therapy in oncological breast surgery.
No randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of double blockade on G-CSF induced bone pain. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of double blockade on the incidence and severity of G-CSF induced bone pain.
The purpose of this study is to measure safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor efficacy of GM103 administered alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, refractory and/or metastatic solid tumors (including but not limited to head and neck cancer, malignant melanoma, CRC, renal cell carcinoma, cervical cancer, and breast cancer). Study details include:
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the ability of a the Z-scanner to identify and differentiate cancer and benign lesions from healthy breast tissue based on permittivity. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Determine the permittivity values of the Z-scanner associated with healthy, benign, and malignant tissue in human breasts. 2. Determine the repeatability, reproducibility, inter-and intra-operator variability of the Z-scanner.
The purpose of this research study is to see if the medication sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is effective at the currently approved dose and schedule in people who have previously received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for the treatment of metastatic, hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 low (HER2 low) breast cancer. Although SG is approved to treat metastatic HR+/HER2 negative breast cancer, the aim of this study is to determine if SG is still effective specifically in people who have already received T-DXd.
This prospective pilot study of biological specimens aims to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to standard therapy for local advanced BC, as well as to identify new targets for the development of immuno- therapeutic protocols. First aim is therefore to expand our knowledge to increase the response to preoperative treatment, intensify treatment patterns, and select patients based on clinical parameters. In this regard, it appears imperative to investigate yet under-investigated factors that might impair the response to standard therapy for local advanced BC including association to metabolic syndrome and analysis of tumoral and stromal features supporting a tumor microenvironment impenetrable to both drugs and immune system cells.
This clinical trial tests whether increased activity throughout the day can improve the chronic pain and associated symptoms that breast cancer survivors may experience after surgery. Staying active is a key factor of one's physical, mental, and social health and well-being. Moving more could also reduce pain and associated stress, anxiety, or depression. Using a fitness tracker may help patients to move around more, whether or not they choose to exercise. Information gathered from this study may help researchers learn how the use of a Fitbit tracker with health coaching may improve physical activity and reduce pain in young, Hispanic breast cancer survivors.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of abemaciclib and giredestrant before surgery in participants with early stage, oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Primary objective: ● To evaluate the efficacy of abemaciclib and giredestrant in complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) rate at Week 2. Secondary objectives: - To evaluate the efficacy of abemaciclib and giredestrant in reducing the relative Ki67 expression from baseline to Week 2 - To evaluate the efficacy of abemaciclib and giredestrant in risk of recurrence (ROR) score reduction, clinical and radiological tumor response; - To evaluate the safety of abemaciclib and giredestrant. Exploratory objectives: - To evaluate the mechanisms of response and resistance to therapy; - To evaluate the correlation between Ki-67% reduction and 18- Fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake reduction; - To evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/is, ypN0) of giredestrant plus abemaciclib
The treatment and prognosis of breast cancer (BC) are dependent on its molecular subtype and nodal burden. In early BCs with favourable molecular subtype, the incidence of axillary node involvement is low. However, these patients are still subjected to an axillary operation, which can result in additional cost, operating time and morbidities. Similarly, in patients with limited nodal burden of 1-2 metastatic nodes, there is emerging evidence that these patients may need sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only, instead of an axillary clearance (AC), which has more surgical morbidities. We aimed to determine if axillary surgery could be safely tailored in BC patients based on their molecular subtype and nodal burden, without compromising their oncological outcomes. This could in turn reduce the morbidities associated with the axillary surgery, Total 350 patients will be enrolled. 50 patients with early BC and favourable molecular subtype will be enrolled in a pilot study A (SentiOMIT), whereby SLNB is omitted. For eligible patients who declined study A and other stage I-II patients, with preoperative N0 status, undergoing upfront surgery but did not meet the inclusion criteria of Study A, these patients will be enrolled into study B (SentiMACRO) to undergo SLNB. In study B, the patients will be categorized based on SLNB into 3 groups with 100 patients in each arm: B1 with pN0, B2- 1-2 metastatic nodes and B3- >/=3 metastatic nodes. In Study B, we aim to investigate if the B2 group (100 patients) can be treated with a less invasive procedure of SLNB alone instead of AC, without affecting oncological outcomes. B1 and B3 are controls. The outcomes for study A and B include short term outcomes such as morbidity rates, cost and operating time savings. Long term outcomes include recurrence and survival rates. This study will allow individualisation of axillary surgery based on the patient's molecular subtype and nodal burden, to benefit patients' care.