Stroke, Ischemic Clinical Trial
— urochesterOfficial title:
Effect of Visual Retraining on Visual Loss Following Cortical Damage
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | University of Rochester |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This project is intended to collect data using standard clinical tests and psychophysics to quantify the effect of visual cortical damage on the structure of the residual visual system, visual perception, spatial awareness, and brain function. The investigators will also assess the effect of intensive visual retraining on the residual visual system, processing of visual information and the use of such information in real-world situations following damage. This research is intended to improve our understanding of the consequences of permanent visual system damage in humans, of methods that can be used to reverse visual loss, and of brain mechanisms by which visual recovery is achieved.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 100 |
Est. completion date | January 2032 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2030 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 21 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Cortically Blind Subjects Inclusion: - Between 21 and 80 years of age - Residents of the United States or Canada - Unilateral stroke or stroke-like damage to primary visual cortex or its immediate afferent white matter sustained within the specified age range (21-75 years) - Reliable visual field defects in both eyes as measured by Humphrey, MAIA, Goldmann, and/or equivalent perimetry, large enough to enclose a 5-deg diameter visual stimulus. - Able to fixate on visual targets reliably for 1000ms - Must have a home computer (desktop or laptop) and reliable internet access - Willing, able, and competent to provide informed consent - Normal cognitive abilities, able to understand written and oral instructions in English, and competent and responsible adults in order to complete the visual training at home, independently, as instructed, for several months. Exclusion: - Past or present eye disease interfering with visual acuity - BCVA worse than 20/40 in either eye - Damage to the dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus - Diffuse whole brain degenerative processes - History of traumatic brain injury - Any other brain damage deemed by study staff to potentially interfere with training ability or outcome measures - Documented history of drug/alcohol abuse - Currently taking neuroactive medications which would impact training, as determined by PI - Presence of cognitive or seizure disorders - One-sided attentional neglect - Subjects who lack the competence or are otherwise unable to perform the visual training exercises as directed. Control Subjects (n = 50) Inclusion: - Between 21 and 80 years of age - Report no history of neurological disorder. - Competent and responsible, as determined by the Principal Investigator. Exclusion: - Presence of damage to the visual system - Presence of an active disease process involving their nervous system. - Cognitive or seizure disorders - Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in either eye - Presence of vision field loss from ocular disease or disorder |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Rochester |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Mean Direction Discrimination Threshold | For each subject, the investigators will measure the change in ability to detect differences in the motion direction of visual stimuli relative to horizontal, measured in degrees of visual angle with respect to the stimulus. These assessments will be based on what can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance on our 2AFC task, with task difficulty adjusted on a 3:1 staircase. The degrees of visual angle for the stimulus vary from 90 degrees (fully vertical) to 0.1 degrees (virtually overlapping the horizontal axis).
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Direction Discrimination Threshold | For each subject, the investigators will measure the change in ability to detect differences in the motion direction of visual stimuli relative to horizontal, measured in degrees of visual angle with respect to the stimulus. These assessments will be based on what can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance on our 2AFC task, with task difficulty adjusted on a 3:1 staircase. The degrees of visual angle for the stimulus vary from 90 degrees (fully vertical) to 0.1 degrees (virtually overlapping the horizontal axis).
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Direction Integration Threshold | This will measure the change in ability of subjects to integrate across a range of motion directions measured in degrees of visual angle, with respect to the stimulus. These assessments will be based on what range of motion directions can be reliably integrated at a 72-75% correct level of performance on our 2AFC task, with task difficulty adjusted on a 3:1 staircase. The degrees of visual angle for the stimulus vary from 90 degrees (fully vertical) to 0.1 degrees (virtually overlapping the horizontal axis) .
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Direction Integration Threshold | This will measure the change in ability of subjects to integrate across a range of motion directions measured in degrees of visual angle, with respect to the stimulus. These assessments will be based on what range of motion directions can be reliably integrated at a 72-75% correct level of performance on our 2AFC task, with task difficulty adjusted on a 3:1 staircase. The degrees of visual angle for the stimulus vary from 90 degrees (fully vertical) to 0.1 degrees (virtually overlapping the horizontal axis) .
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Contrast Sensitivity for Direction | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for direction discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the motion direction of visual stimuli that are also varying in contrast against a grey background. The investigators will measure the luminance contrast, measured in percentage of contrast with respect to the stimulus, that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. Contrast will vary between 100% (maximum contrast of black on grey) and 0.1% (minimum contrast visible of grey-on-grey) based on subject performance and a 3:1 staircase. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Contrast Sensitivity for Direction | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for direction discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the motion direction of visual stimuli that are also varying in contrast against a grey background. The investigators will measure the luminance contrast, measured in percentage of contrast with respect to the stimulus, that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. Contrast will vary between 100% (maximum contrast of black on grey) and 0.1% (minimum contrast visible of grey-on-grey) based on subject performance and a 3:1 staircase. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Contrast Sensitivity for Static Orientation | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for static orientation discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the orientation of non-moving visual stimuli that vary in contrast against a grey background. The investigators will measure the luminance contrast, measured in percentage of contrast with respect to the stimulus, that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. Contrast will vary between 100% (maximum contrast of black on grey) and 0.1% (minimum contrast visible of grey-on-grey) based on subject performance and a 3:1 staircase. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Primary | Change in Mean Contrast Sensitivity for Static Orientation | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for static orientation discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the orientation of non-moving visual stimuli that vary in contrast against a grey background. The investigators will measure the luminance contrast, measured in percentage of contrast with respect to the stimulus, that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. Contrast will vary between 100% (maximum contrast of black on grey) and 0.1% (minimum contrast visible of grey-on-grey) based on subject performance and a 3:1 staircase. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Secondary | Humphrey 10-2 and 24-2 perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Secondary | Humphrey 10-2 and 24-2 perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Secondary | Goldmann perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in area of vision (degrees squared) as encompassed by each isopter, measured by one of 3 different light stimuli.
The 3 isopters which will be compared are: I2e 1asb, 0.25 mm^2 I4e 10asb, 0.25 mm^2 V4e 1000asb, 64 mm^2 These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Secondary | Goldmann perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in area of vision (degrees squared) as encompassed by each isopter, measured by one of 3 different light stimuli.
The 3 isopters which will be compared are: I2e 1asb, 0.25 mm^2 I4e 10asb, 0.25 mm^2 V4e 1000asb, 64 mm^2 These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months | |
Secondary | MAIA Visual Field Perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-6 months | |
Secondary | MAIA Visual Field Perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-6 months, then baseline to 8-12 months from start of training. |
Baseline to 8-12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03993236 -
Study on Rosuvastatin+Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin for LDL-C Goal in Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04069767 -
Innovative Physiotherapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06342206 -
The Assessment of Acute /Chronic Phase in Patients With Ischemic Cerebral Stroke Using TCM Diagnostic Tools
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03605381 -
MORbidity PRevalence Estimate In StrokE
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04956211 -
Periodontal Treatment and Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05098236 -
Effect of Visual Retraining on Visual Loss Following Visual Cortical Damage
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03942588 -
High-intensity Interval Training After Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04949334 -
Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04095767 -
Assessing Safety and Performance of the ANA Catheter System, Combined With a Stent Retriever in Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06352086 -
Understanding Visual Processing After Occipital Stroke
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04991038 -
Clinical Investigation to Compare Safety and Efficacy of DAISE and Stent Retrievers for Thrombectomy In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01937182 -
The Efficacy of Citalopram Treatment in Acute Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03649295 -
Combined Conventional Speech Therapy and Functional Electrical Stimulation in Dysphagia Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05303649 -
Effects of Neuronavigated Theta Burst Stimulation in Therapy of Post-stroke Aphasia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04233515 -
Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Symptoms in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Örebro County
|
||
Completed |
NCT05102877 -
Sensory Versus Motor Level Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04089917 -
A Study of the Use of the Q Aspiration Catheter to Remove Clot in Stroke Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT05221112 -
Effects of PNF Patterns Training on Trunk Balance, and Gait in Chronic Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05035953 -
Thrombolysis Combined With Edaravone Dexborneol on Hemorrhagic Transformation for Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT06326801 -
Resistive Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise With Pursed Lips Breathing Exercise in Sub-acute Stroke Patients
|
N/A |