View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:Objective: To determine whether NIV delivered through helmet interface reduces intubation rate among patients with COVID-19 ARDS compared to face-mask NIV and HFNC. Design, setting & participants: Two-center randomized clinical trial of 360 patients with mild to moderate ARDS and confirmed COVID-19 requiring non-invasive ventilation between August 2020 to January 2021. The patients with respiratory rate (RR) more than 30/min or oxygen saturation (SpO2) less than 90% or PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 300 despite standard oxygen therapy by face mask (<15 L/min) who present to Royal hospital or Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) emergency department, medical wards or intensive care unit (ICU). Intervention: Patients will be randomly assigned (block randomization) to either face-mask NIV, HFNC or Helmet NIV. The helmet is a transparent hood that covers the entire head of the patient and has a rubber collar neck seal. Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome is the rate of endotracheal intubation at 28-days. Secondary outcomes include hospital mortality at 28 and 90 days, NIV free days, invasive ventilator free days and hospital length of stay. Expected results: We assume the failure rate of Helmet NIV to be 30%, failure rate of HFNC to be 40% and failure rate of face-mask NIV to be 50%. A sample size of 360 patients (120/group) will achieve a power of 0.90 at a significance level of 0.05. To account for 10% dropout rate, the total sample required is 396 subjects(132/group).
Use of veno-venous extracorporeal oxygenation membrane is a therapeutic option for the management of the most severe patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Given the prolonged duration of this strategy, the question of its impact on the occurrence on diaphragm dysfunction has been raised. The present study endeavors to evaluate and follow up the prevalence, risk factors and prognosis of diaphragm dysfunction in patients with VV-ECMO.
With this study researchers want to find the highest safe dose of the soluble Guanylate Cyclase (sGC) Activator, BAY 1211163 and how safe and well the study drug works. Furthermore researchers want to gather information on the way the body absorbs, distributes and gets rid of the study drug given as increasing multiple doses by inhalation to patients who cannot breathe by their own and suffer from a type of lung failure that causes fluid to build up in the lungs making breathing difficult (ARDS)
The purpose of our prospective monocentric, randomized, controlled trial is to evaluate the effects of intravenous lidocaine on gas exchange and inflammation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due or not to Covid-19 pneumonia. Half of the patients will receive intravenous lidocaine and the other half will receive intravenous NaCl 0,9 % as placebo.
Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PLN-74809 in participants with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with at least severe COVID-19
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brexanolone in participants on ventilator support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19.
Emergency study to test the safety of Descartes-30 cells in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) AND COVID-19
PNEUMA is a preliminary safety and feasibility trial of a novel approach to the titration of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to safe spontaneous breathing in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).
This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, dose escalation and proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of razuprotafib, administered 3 times daily (TID) (every 8 hours [Q8H]), in hospitalized subjects with moderate to severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receiving standard of care therapy. The study was planned to include 2 parts with Part 1 comprising the dose escalation period of the study and Part 2 comprising the proof-of-concept safety and efficacy period of the study.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poractant alfa (Curosurf®), administered by endotracheal (ET) instillation in hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with SARS-COV-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).