View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:This phase IIb study, LEONARDO is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel group study, to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Plerixafor in patients over 18 years of age, - with acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19 and - Recently admitted in ICU or equivalent structure (within 48 hours) for COVID-19 related respiratory failure - without invasive mechanical ventilation and - requiring oxygen support ≥ 5L/min to obtain a transcutaneous O2 saturation > 94% A total of 150 participants, will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Plerixafor (n=100) or placebo (n=50) as a continuous IV infusion for 7 days (from D1 to D8) in addition to standard of care (e.g. glucocorticoids...). Safety data will be reviewed by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) during the study.
Evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacodynamics&pharmacokinetic properties of CT303 in patients with ARDS.
Tracheal intubation remains a common procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the delivery room (DR). Current guidelines recommend Estimation of correct endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion Our hospital policy recommends to estimate the correct depth (cm) of tube placement by measuring the nasal-ear-tragus length using the "7-8-9 rule" when the endotracheal tube is placed orally. Using this formula an infant weighing 1kg would be intubated to a depth of 7cm, a 2kg infant to a depth of 8cm, and a 3kg infant to a depth of 9cm from the upper lip. With the new 2015 guidelines, ETT depth is determined by measuring the newborn's nasal septum-tragus length (NTL) and adding 1cm or by using the "initial endotracheal tube insertion depth" table. The NTL is described as the distance from the base of the nasal septum to the tragus of the ear. However, studies using NTL reported that using this technique only resulted in correct ETT placement in 56% of cases. Every ETT has markings on the tube, which are called vocal cord markings, which are to be used to provide a guidance to how deep to place the ETT into the trachea. There has been npc study to compare the vocal cord markings with the current approach of NTL. The current study aims to determine if the use of vocal cord markings during intubation increases percentage of correct endotracheal tube placement compared to NTL in preterm and term infants.
A study of intubated critically ill patients infected with SARS-COV-2 to evaluate the safety and treatment effects of ultraviolet-A (UVA) light administered by a novel device via endotracheal tube in a first-in-human study. Study hypothesis was that respiratory SARS-CoV-2 viral burden would significantly decrease following five (5) days of UVA therapy.
Brief Summary: SARS-CoV-2 virus infection is known to cause Lung Injury that begins as dyspnea and exercise intolerance, but may rapidly progress to Critical COVID-19 with Respiratory Failure and the need for noninvasive or mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates as high as 80% have been reported among those who require mechanical ventilation, despite best available intensive care. Patients with severe COVID-19 by FDA definition who have not developed respiratory failure be treated with nebulized ZYESAMI™ (aviptadil acetate, a synthetic version of Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP)) 100 μg 3x daily plus Standard of Care vs. placebo + Standard of Care using an FDA 501(k) cleared mesh nebulizer. The primary outcome will be progression in severity of COVID-19 (i.e. critical OR severe progressing to critical) over 28 days. Secondary outcomes will include blood oxygenation as measured by pulse oximetry, dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and levels of TNFα IL-6 and other cytokines.
This is a multiregional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study in patients with confirmed symptomatic COVID-19, designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and PK of XW001 (IL-29 analog) inhalation solution. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with XW001 reduces the likelihood of worsening disease in patients with severe COVID-19. Hospitalized patients on oxygen therapy by mask or nasal prongs (WHO-OSCI score 4) will be enrolled.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of repurposing tazemetostat for the treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) or Systemic Cytokine Release Syndrome (SCRS) in COVID-19 patients.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the number of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a severe, life-threatening medical condition characterised by inflammation and fluid in the lungs. There is no proven therapy to reduce fluid leak, also known as pulmonary oedema, in ARDS. However, recent studies have discovered that imatinib prevents fluid leak in the lungs in inflammatory conditions, while leaving the immune response intact. Adding imatinib into the standard care package may, therefore, decrease mortality and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation compared with standard care alone, in critically-ill patients with COVID-19. To help determine the impact of imatinib in these patients we present a randomised, double-blind, multi-centre, 2-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical study of intravenous imatinib in 84 mechanically-ventilated, adult subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. Study participants (patients who have consented into the study) will receive the study drug (imatinib or placebo) twice daily for a period of 10 days. The effect of the intervention will be tested by measuring the change from baseline in the Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI) at day 10. OSI is a non-invasive means of measuring oxygenation and is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with ARDS, serving thus as a relevant endpoint from which to assess the efficacy of imatinib. Other measurements will include regular blood tests as part of safety assessments. Time on ventilation and morbidity and mortality will be recorded as secondary outcome measures. Blood tests will also allow the investigation of the pharmacokinetic properties of imatinib, as well as biomarkers of inflammation.
Preterm neonates usually develop respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for which they need respiratory support, which may be invasive and non-invasive depend on the availability and individual need. Non-invasive is relatively safe but non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is not appropriately evaluated in neonates as primary support. So the investigators hypothesized that nHFOV is relatively safe and effective in comparison with invasive ventilation for preterm neonates with RDS.
This is a Phase 2 randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of COVI-MSC in the setting of current standard of care treatments for subjects hospitalized subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome not related to COVID-19 infection.