View clinical trials related to Obesity, Morbid.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to test a personalized intervention aiming to optimize the mechanical ventilator settings in morbidly obese patients suffering from moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The intervention consists of personalized measurements and calculations of the different pressures inside the thorax. The main question to answer is: • Will the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy lead to different mechanical ventilator settings than suggested by a strategy largely used in ARDS patients in France? A specific nasogastric probe permitting to measure esophageal pressure will monitor participants. Esophageal pressure will act as an indicator of the pleural pressure. Other respiratory signals displayed by the mechanical ventilators will also be acquired. Further, ventilator settings will be adjusted to the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy, with possible benefit of this personalized approach.
Teenagers with body mass values (BMI) above 35 kg/m2 and co-morbidity are designated for medical disqualification from service in the IDF. Data show that there has been an increase in the incidence of these teenagers, specifically among the lower socioeconomic status. The purpose of this pilot study is to carry out an intervention Based lifestyle modification among a group of boys and girls with morbid obesity accompanied by a comorbidity that disqualifies them from service in the IDF. Definition of success: meeting the threshold of weight and health status that allows recruitment into the IDF. Criteria for finding candidates: - Boys and girls from the age of 15 who suffer from morbid obesity and comorbidity that may prevent their enlistment in the IDF. (This age range was chosen to allow an ideal period of at least one year to make a significant change). - Boys and girls who have their own and their family's willingness and commitment to participate in the process - A basic state of health that allows participation in the program. The screening process will be done by the staff of the endocrine unit, under the management of Prof. Orit Pinhas-Hamiel. Duration of intervention: 26 weekly sessions for the trainees. The duration of the meeting will be about three hours in the afternoon A decision whether to extend the duration of the intervention will be taken according to the initial results of the program. Activity location: Potential sites vary: Sheba// academic complex // military base for trainees. Number of participants - 25, (dropout expected 30%) Research goals (main content elements in the program) - there are 3 main content areas (of similar importance) - Education about the importance of service in the IDF and the opportunities inherent in it - Ability-adapted physical activity education and training - Guidance for a healthy diet - Psychological support [The medical accompaniment to the program will take place on the basis of the patients' mother clinics and the medical follow-up of them will be done separately].
Obesity worsens treatment outcomes in rectal cancer patients: the local resective approach could in fact be more difficult in obese patients due to limited surgical visibility and it has also been reported that high visceral adiposity determines an increased risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy neoadjuvant. Bariatric surgery has proved to be the best choice for the treatment of morbid obesity and related comorbidities and in this context, the intragastric balloon (IGB) represents a strategy characterized by a low rate of complications and good results in terms of weight loss. Therefore, the need to be able to offer obese patients suffering from rectal cancer the possibility of a better recovery perspective, alongside radical oncological surgery and neoadjuvant treatments, also a bariatric surgery such as the positioning of an intragastric balloon.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl during general anesthesia for patients with morbid obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
The present study aims to design, develop and validate a preoperative calculator for "Textbook Outcome" after bariatric surgery, in order to calculate the possibility of not achieving "Textbook outcome" based on the characteristics of the patient and the proposed surgical technique.
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment to achieve type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) remission in patients with severe obesity. However, there is little evidence of the effectiveness and pathophysiological mechanisms involved in metabolic improvement after hypoabsortive tecniques such as duodenal switch (DS), single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) or minigastric bypass (MGB). We have designed a randomized study to compare type 2 diabetes remission after the 3 bariatric procedures in patients with severe obesity (BMI > 45kg/m2) and to study the implication of gastrointestinal hormones, bile acids and gut microbiota in metabolic improvement in each procedure.
The worldwide prevalence of obesity reaching epidemic levels, and directly associated with several non-communicable chronic diseases, being considered the sixth leading cause of death in the world. In Brazil, estimated that one third of the population is overweight. Currently, bariatric surgery the fastest and most effective method to control the disease. However, most patients do not follow the postoperative follow-up protocol, causing weight regain. Intervention in the literature that goes beyond multidisciplinary and can prevent weight relapse. The develop and apply an interdisciplinary manual, based on the guidelines of the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population, as a support in the prophylactic treatment of weight relapse patients and bariatric surgery
The goal of this comparative clinical trial is to compare Pfannenstiel incision and higher transverse supra umbilical incision techniques during elective cesarean section in morbidly obese patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in operative time between the two incision techniques? Is there a difference in estimated blood loss between the two techniques? Is there a difference in post-operative pain scores between the two techniques? Is there a difference in wound complication rates between the two techniques? Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a Pfannenstiel incision or a higher transverse supra umbilical incision during their scheduled cesarean delivery. Researchers will compare the Pfannenstiel incision group to the higher transverse supra umbilical incision group to see if there are differences in operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, and wound complications.
Treating patients with super-obesity has always been challenging for bariatric surgeons due to the higher risk of postoperative complications and the limited success of commonly used bariatric procedures (restrictive and hypo-absorptive). In this context, these patients are often considered for more complex procedures, such as hypo-absorptive interventions. Over the past 15 years, a new hypo-absorptive procedure called single-anastomosis duodenal switch with biliopancreatic diversion (SADI-S) has been introduced and recognized as a bariatric procedure by leading national and international scientific societies. It has shown promising short- and medium-term results regarding weight loss and metabolic improvements. The SADI-S procedure is a technically complex multi-quadrant surgery. This study aims to evaluate the equivalence in terms of morbidity between laparoscopic and robotic approaches for patients undergoing this procedure.
Compare the effects of two different doses of dexmedetomidine infusion on oxygenation as a primary outcome and on lung mechanics, quality of recovery and perioperative analgesia as secondary outcomes in morbidly obese patients with restrictive lung disease undergoing abdominal surgery.