View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of an 8-week intervention where peer coaches will deliver depression care to adults 60 years of age or older who have depression and subjective cognitive decline.
This study is a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of esketamine versus modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) in treating suicidal ideation during depressive episodes of mood disorders. Additionally, it seeks to explore the potential mechanisms of esketamine's anti-suicidal effects.
Objective: To design, develop, and evaluate a personalized intervention for the universal prevention of depression and anxiety in the general population based on risk algorithms, ICTs, and decision support systems (DSS). Methods: A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a twelve-month follow-up. The entire process of recruitment, random allocation, intervention, and follow-up will be conducted through the 'PredictPlusPrevent' platform and its associated apps. Following a media campaign, at least 9,000 Spanish participants aged 18 to 55 years without depression and/or anxiety at baseline will be randomly assigned to the intervention or active control group "PredictPlusPrevent". The "PredictPlusPrevent" intervention will be self-guided and implemented through participants' smartphones via an app; it will have a biopsychosocial and multi-component approach (8 modules: physical exercise, improving sleep, expanding relationships, problem-solving, improving communication, assertiveness, decision-making, and managing thoughts). The "PredictPlusPrevent" intervention is based on validated risk algorithms for depression and anxiety and a DSS that will help participants develop their own personalized depression prevention plans, which they will implement themselves while the platform monitors and provides feedback. The active control "PredictPlusPrevent" will include information from the risk algorithms and 24 self-help booklets. The primary outcome will be the incidence of new cases of depression and/or anxiety assessed using the PRIME-MD questionnaire, and secondary outcomes will include reductions in depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7), probability of depression and anxiety risk (predictD and predictA algorithms), and physical and mental quality of life (SF-12).
Objectives: To identify in patients with major depression different peripheral markers of neuroinflammation in relation to affective symptoms (anxiety, depression, irritability), fatigue and cognitive symptoms; and its relationship with the response to antidepressant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Methodology: This is a prospective observational cohort study in patients with major depression naturally subjected to treatment with SSRIs. For this, 30 patients with major depression attended in the Outpatient Psychiatry Consultations will be selected. All of them will be evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of treatment, collecting demographic and clinical variables, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) psychiatric diagnoses, psychopathological scales and immunological and biochemical variables. The correlation between immunological markers and affective and cognitive symptoms at baseline, as well as their variation with treatment, will be analyzed. A group of 20 healthy subjects will be used as a control group. Subsequently, a bivariate comparative analysis will be carried out, where the statistically significant or marginally significant variables associated with psychopathological variables will be used to build a multivariate binary logistic regression model.
The purpose of this research study is to develop and test an intervention designed to improve mood and reduce symptoms of depression.
Poor sleep quality is common in neuropsychiatric conditions and some of the problems associated with poor sleep at night may be due to medication side effects or reduced efficacy of certain treatments. Poor sleep quality has been implicated in cognitive impairments, with the sleep quality to cognition association so strong that specialized assessments have been developed to examine the subjective association between poor nighttime sleep and daytime cognitive impairment. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is a training procedure designed to build cognitive skills, with a goal of improvement of functional outcomes. CCT is also a learning-based approach and previous studies have shown that successful CCT interventions lead to changes in brain circuitry. It is also known, however, that many cases who are treated with CCT fail to make treatment-related gains. Recent studies have suggested that this may be associated with failures to engage in the training procedures, which could be related to sleep related impairments. Increased anticholinergic load can also substantially disrupt the process of training related gains directly. Antihistaminergic effects, common to many antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, can lead to daytime sedation and sleepiness, which both interferes with treatment but also interferes with nighttime sleep as well In previous clinical trials, Lurasidone was associated with reductions in sleepiness and with cognitive gains that exceeded practice effects. One viable hypothesis is that Lurasidone has both direct beneficial effects on cognition and substantial indirect benefits, due to the lack of histamine receptor occupancy, lack of anticholinergic effects, and direct promotion of positive nighttime sleep outcomes. Thus, a broad-spectrum naturalistic comparison of Lurasidone-treated patients with patients treated with other medications is proposed. This would include examining the level of engagement in CCT treatment, measurement of CCT training gains, and relating engagement and training gains with concurrent sleep quality, measured by actigraphy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare ketamine to a placebo when given as a single infusion during sedation in adults with chronic pain and depression. This study aims to: - Evaluate whether ketamine is more effective than a placebo in treating chronic pain and depression - Confirm that propofol sedation is a safe way to keep participants blinded to treatment - Assess patients' comfort with the sedation process to improve future studies - Explore whether patient expectations affects their pain and depression Participants will: - Need to qualify for the study based on stringent medical criteria - Undergo sedation with propofol - Randomly receive either a ketamine or a placebo (saline) infusion during sedation - Complete several study assessments over 5-7 weeks
This study will test whether it is feasible to conduct a clinical trial of mirtazapine (an antidepressant tablet) in patients who have both depression and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study design is a randomised controlled trial (a study in which people are allocated by chance to receive different interventions). The trial will compare mirtazapine against a placebo (dummy) tablet in 76 patients with both depression and IBD. The investigators will recruit outpatients aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of any IBD attending gastroenterology clinics. Either in person or remotely, patients will complete a brief screening questionnaire for depression. Those scoring positive for depression will be invited for a 15-minute interview for clinical depression. Those with clinical depression will be invited to take part. Participants will be randomly allocated by a computer to take either 1) mirtazapine tablet once at night for 12 weeks; or 2) placebo (dummy) tablet once at night for 12 weeks. The study is 'blinded', meaning neither patients nor the study team will know which medication they are taking. Throughout, participants will be able to access other treatments for depression, such as talking therapies. The investigators will measure how many people join the study; how many remain in the trial; how many complete treatment; how many tablets people take; and assess overall acceptability of the trial. Participants will complete brief questionnaires to measure their mental health and IBD symptoms after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks. Participants will also provide blood samples and faecal samples to measure inflammation. If successful, this trial will support an application for a larger version of the study.
The study's primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of Tinazidine compared to Zolpidem in enhancing sleep quality, with secondary objectives including the assessment of adverse effects, safety profile, and patient tolerance with each treatment. The trial will be conducted as a double-blind RCT, with participants randomly assigned to receive either Tinazidine (0.1 mg/Kg/HS) or Zolpidem 10 mg HS, for 12 weeks. Eligible participants, aged 18-60 years, diagnosed with primary insomnia as per DSM-5 criteria, will be recruited from an outpatient sleep clinic affiliated with Al-Masara Hospital. Data on sleep quality, and side effects, will be collected using the Sleep Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), sleep diaries, actigraphy, polysomnography, and regular clinical interview though OPD follow-up visits. The primary outcome considered was the mean global PSQI score before and after the treatment. The primary outcome will be measured four times (baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks), We considered an attrition rate (dropout/lost follow-up) of 10%. Therefore, the sample size is 90 subjects (45 in each group). Group comparisons for mean scores will be conducted using independent samples t-tests, and within-group comparisons will be assessed using paired samples t-tests. Changes in sleep quality over time between treatment groups will be evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA. Associations between categorical variables will be examined using Chi-square tests (including Fisher's exact or Likelihood ratio tests as appropriate). Statistical significance will be considered for p-values less than 0.05. All analyses will be performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 29.0). The findings of this study seek to elucidate the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of Tizanidine and Zolpidem in treating primary insomnia. The study aims to offer insights into the effectiveness of Tizanidine versus Zolpidem in improving sleep quality among patients with primary insomnia. Through the evaluation of efficacy, adverse effects, and safety profiles. This study aims to inform clinicians and healthcare practitioners about the optimal treatment choices for individuals with primary insomnia.
The goal of this interventional study is to compare the baseline neural mechanisms and parenting in depressed and non-depressed children and to examine baseline neural mechanisms and parenting as predictors of Family-Focused Treatment for Childhood-Depression (FFT-CD) outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What are differences between depressed and non-depressed participants on baseline neural and parenting indicators? - Do baseline neural and parenting indicators predict response to FFT-CD? - Does change in parenting and neural functioning mediate change in depression from baseline to follow-up? Participants will: - complete baseline clinical measures - complete neuroimaging tasks via Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMR) - undergo a 12-session course of FFT-CD - complete follow up evaluations and neuroimaging