View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:This is an experimental study without drug or device, randomized, open-label, non-profit, sponsored by the IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital in Negrar, which will take place at the Department of Advanced Oncological Radiotherapy and 18 other Italian centers. The reason for this research study is to evaluate whether stereotactic radiotherapy treatment (SABR), in addition to the systemic chemotherapy treatment foreseen by clinical practice for low-intermediate risk oligometastatic colorectal cancer, is able to: - delay possible local recurrence and/or distant polymetastatic progression - improve disease-free survival - reduce side effects in the short and long term thus inducing an improvement in the quality of life of patients suffering from this type of pathology. Therefore, as part of this randomized study, before starting first or second line systemic therapy for his tumor, the patient will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms: - Experimental arm: ablative stereotactic radiotherapy on all sites of oligometastatic disease (from 1 to 3 sites, performed at most within the second cycle of systemic therapy) - Control arm: no ablative stereotactic radiotherapy to sites of oligometastatic disease The procedure that is intended to be tested in the experimental arm is a stereotactic radiotherapy treatment on oligometastases (up to a maximum of 3 sites), with ablative dosage (effective biological dose >100 Gy), performed before the start of systemic therapy of I or II line (at most within the second cycle of the same). It is hoped that the addition of this type of radiotherapy will increase the potential clinical benefit of the treatment in the context of colorectal cancer.
CoLiQ is an observational study designed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) markers found in blood, as a liquid biopsy for diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of colorectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1) Can a panel of ctDNA markers identify CRC patients among the other patients summoned for colonoscopy? and 2) Does the type, number and level of ctDNA markers vary with the subtype and clinical course of CRC? Participants will be asked to answer a questionnaire and give a blood sample at inclusion. In addition, patients with CRC will be asked to give an extra test tube at their routine treatment and follow-up blood sampling.
This is a multicenter, open-label, prospective Phase 1/2a study to assess safety and tolerability, establish dosimetry and to identify an optimal imaging dose (radioactivity and mass dose) and imaging time window of 64Cu-LNTH-1363S (64Cu Radiolabeled FAPi PET/CT Imaging Agent) and to compare its imaging biodistribution with FAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in patients with sarcomas or GIT cancers. The study will be conducted in 2 parts (Part 1 and Part 2).
Improving personalized cancer treatments and finding the best strategies to treat each patient relies on using new diagnostic technologies. Currently, for colorectal cancer, the methods used to decide who gets additional post-surgery treatment are suboptimal. Some patients get too much treatment, while others do not get enough. There is a new way to explore if there is any cancer left in a patient's body using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected in blood samples. This can help decide who needs more treatment after surgery. Even though many tests have been developed, it has yet to be determined which test performs best at relevant time points. The GUIDE.MRD consortium is a group of experts, including scientists, technology, and pharmaceutical companies. The consortium is working on creating a reliable standard for the ctDNA tests, validating their clinical utility, and collecting data to help decide on the best treatment for each patient. FRENCH-MRD-CRC is the French study of the european GUIDE.MRD project.
Improving personalized cancer treatments and finding the best strategies to treat each patient relies on using new diagnostic technologies. Currently, for colorectal cancer, the methods used to decide who gets additional post-surgery treatment are suboptimal. Some patients get too much treatment, while others do not get enough. There is a new way to explore if there is any cancer left in a patient's body using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected in blood samples. This can help decide who needs more treatment after surgery. Even though many tests have been developed, it has yet to be determined which test performs best at relevant time points. The GUIDE.MRD consortium is a group of experts, including scientists, technology, and pharmaceutical companies. The consortium is working on creating a reliable standard for the ctDNA tests, validating their clinical utility, and collecting data to help decide on the best treatment for each patient. FRENCH.MRD.CRLM is the French study and part of the european GUIDE.MRD project.
This observational study aims to test proteomics, metabolomics and proteoglycans as predictors of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery and as biomarkers of colorectal cancer. The main questions to answer are: - can these biomarkers predict anastomotic leakages - can these biomarkers predict recurrence after colorectal cancer - can these biomarkers be used as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer - can these biomarkers be identified in the tumor Participants will undergo elective colorectal resection or stoma closure.
The aim of this prospective, observational cohort study is to assess the impact of iron deficiency anaemia on the incidence of perioperative complications and the quality of recovery after surgery in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. The main questions the study aims to answer are: - whether the presence of preoperative iron deficiency anaemia leads to a poorer quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery - whether different combinations of complete blood count parameters (red blood cell indices) could be suitable diagnostic tools for the detection of iron deficiency in the latent stage (without laboratory-confirmed anaemia) in colorectal cancer patients. Blood samples for laboratory analyses will be collected from each study patient admitted to the surgical ward one day prior to elective surgery and on the first postoperative day during the stay in the intensive care unit. The pre-operative laboratory analyses include a complete blood count and serum iron status parameters (iron concentration, ferritin concentration, TIBC, UIBC and TSAT). Laboratory parameters analysed on the first postoperative day include complete blood count, serum concentration of electrolytes (Na, K, Ca, Cl, Mg), serum concentration of urea and creatinine, parameters of haemostasis (aPTT, PT, INR), serum concentration of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. Data about overall morbidity, intraoperative complications, quality of postoperative recovery, red blood cell transfusion rate, all-cause infection rate, antibiotic usage, as well as length of hospital stay will be collected. The researchers will compare the group of patients with iron deficiency anaemia, the group of patients with iron deficiency in the latent stage and the control group to determine whether patients with iron deficiency have a higher incidence of perioperative complications and impaired recovery after surgery. The researchers will investigate whether iron deficiency can be detected at an early stage, when anaemia is not yet present, by calculating various red blood cell indices.
The goal of this phase III, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial is compare upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy with the standard dose chemotherapy in older patients ( ≥70 years) with metastasized colorectal cancer, with regard to progression-free survival (PFS). The choice between monotherapy (a fluoropyrimidine) and doublet chemotherapy (a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) will be made for each individual patient based on expected risk of chemotherapy toxicity (according to the G8 screening). Patients classified as low risk of toxicity will be randomized between doublet chemotherapy in either full-dose, or with an upfront dose-reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomized between monotherapy in either full-dose or upfront dose-reduction. Primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, overall survival, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness.
The goal of this observational research registry is to learn about health, wellbeing, and needs of survivors of young adult cancer (diagnosed between the ages of 18 and 39). The main question[s] it aims to understand are: - What are the levels of depression, anxiety, social support, and financial distress - Determine effectiveness of YASU programming by measuring changes over time With this registry, the investigators also plan to identify survivors who may be eligible for participation in future research studies pertaining to young adult cancer. Participants will be asked to complete electronic surveys every 6 to 12 months during participation in the registry.
Large (≥20mm) colorectal polyps often harbor areas of advanced neoplasia, making them immediate colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. Such polyps have to be completely removed to prevent CRC and to avoid surgery and/or adjuvant therapy. The laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) are removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, recurrence is common. Recent studies have found that the use of hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) for the ablation of the margin and base of resection post-EMR could significantly reduce the recurrence rate, and complete closure of the post-EMR defect can prevent other adverse pre- and post-procedure outcomes such as bleeding. We hypothesize that performing hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation post-EMR for large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs will demonstrate a lower recurrence rate compared to Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC) margin ablation. We also hypothesize that performing complete closure of the EMR defect will result in lower rates of adverse events compared to cases where no defect closure is performed.