View clinical trials related to Chronic Pain.
Filter by:Chronic pain is a medical and social problem that can significantly impact the quality of life. Chronic pain is an important risk factor in the development of depression. It is shown by the significantly higher prevalence of depression in individuals who experience chronic pain (20-80%). Apart from that, chronic pain and depression also have a close relationship in the development of disease and mutually influence the severity of each condition. To reduce the cost of pain management from a pharmacological perspective and its use in the long term, it is necessary to consider other non-pharmacological treatment methods that have good therapeutic effects with minimal side effects. Acupuncture has become a non-pharmacological therapy option that has proven its effectiveness and safety in treating chronic pain in depressed patients. Previous literature has reported the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy, especially auricular acupuncture in treating pain. Auricular acupuncture therapy using press needles is quite easy to apply, fast, and can provide continuous stimulation with minimal side effects. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the auricular needle press in chronic pain with depressive symptoms. This study was a double-blinded randomized clinical trial and was carried out on outpatients at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital Jakarta and Soerojo Hospital Magelang. This is also a collaborative study between the medical acupuncture department and the psychiatry department. This study includes 60 participants who will be randomly allocated into 2 groups, the press needle and sham press needle groups. The press needles will be placed at 6 auricular points bilaterally, which are MA-TF1 Shenmen, MA-IC7 Heart, and MA-IT1 Cingulate gyrus. The outcomes that will be assessed in this study are pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS) and quality of life using the short form-12 (SF-12) as well as time-to-event achievement in the form of a decrease in the VAS score >= 14 mm.
In this study, the investigators are comparing two types of education for older adults with knee osteoarthritis: standard biomedical education focusing on the disease process, and a newer approach called pain neuroscience education (PNE), which teaches about the complexity of pain and dispels myths. While PNE has shown benefits in self-reported pain and function, little is known about its effects on physiological responses to pain. the investigators will measure physiological indicators, particularly activity in the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which is closely linked to pain. Dysregulation in the ANS is common in chronic pain conditions like osteoarthritis. Our study aims to assess the feasibility of comparing these education methods and explore differences in physiological responses, as well as self-reported outcomes like cognitive and emotional factors. Our goals are to determine if the study protocol is feasible, assess participants' acceptance of the assessment procedures, and explore differences in physiological markers and self-reported outcomes between the two education groups. Ultimately, the investigators aim to understand how different educational approaches may affect nervous system processing in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. the investigators hypothesize that those receiving PNE will show less autonomic arousal and nervous system sensitivity compared to those receiving standard education.
Single center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of back pain. A total of 150 patients age 18-65 presenting to the emergency department with chief complaint of backpain will be enrolled from April 2024 - April 2025. Patients will be randomized and symptom levels will be recorded at 30, 60, 90, minutes. Follow-up will be performed by telephone at 24 hours.
The primary aim of this implementation-effectiveness trial is to examine the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) and patient-centered chronic pain management visits in primary care as interventions to reduce chronic pain, improve quality of life, and reduce opioid-related harms among chronic pain patients on long-term opioid therapy.
The researchers will compare the common methods of post-surgical pain control, such as epidural or intercostal nerve block with a newer method called cryoablation. The research team is conducting this study to determine if cryoablation provides more effective pain control when compared to an epidural or intercostal nerve block.
Spasticity is characterized by increased muscle tension and is a classic consequence of upper motor neuron (UMN) damage in the central nervous system, such as from stroke or trauma. Clinically, it presents as muscle resistance to passive stretching, along with clasp-knife rigidity, clonus, increased tendon reflexes, and muscle spasms. An imbalance of the descending inhibitory and muscle stretch reflexes is thought to be the cause of spasticity. Post-stroke spasticity is a common condition that occurs in 37.5-45% of cases in the acute stage and 19-57.4% in the subacute stage after a stroke. At 6 months post-stroke, spasticity develops in 42.6-49.5% of cases, and at one year, it affects 35-57.4% of individuals. In patients with cerebral palsy (CP), incidence is almost 80% while in those living with spinal cord injury the number approaches up to 93%. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients have a higher prevalence on initial admission to neurorehabilitation but one in three patients will have chronic spasticity. However, the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center report a rate of TBIs amongst deployed veterans to be around 11-23% mostly from blast and explosive trauma. There have been studies as early as the 1980s exploring the efficacy of SCS for spasticity control, however, the credibility of many of these studies is constrained due to an incomplete comprehension of spasticity's underlying mechanisms, outdated research methods, and early limitations in implantable device technology. Intrathecal pumps for baclofen have remained as the mainstay for refractory spasticity, however, it comes with associated risks such as chemical dependence leading to acute baclofen withdrawal and requiring frequent refill requirement. Most importantly, it does not yield functional improvement of muscle activity, just suppression of spasticity. Botox is also routinely used but due to heterogeneity in muscle involvement as well as variability in provider skill, results may be inconsistent and short-lasting, requiring frequent clinic visits for repeat injections to the affected muscle groups. SCS may be able to address that gap in spasticity management.
This study is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of oral Diclofenac and Tramadol in reducing the consumption of narcotic pills (primary outcome) and minimizing patients' exposure to narcotics (secondary outcome) following an ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy procedure on the lateral elbow. The primary objective of this study is to illustrate a reduction in the consumption of narcotic pills following a percutaneous needle tenotomy procedure on the lateral elbow. The secondary aim is to assess the proportion of patients who have been randomly assigned to Diclofenac and successfully refrain from using the Tramadol rescue medication, measured at the 10 day (+/- 4 days) postoperative mark. The third objective is to uphold consistent early recovery outcomes as measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores after percutaneous needle tenotomy of the lateral elbow, while also investigating the relationship between resiliency and pain catastrophizing in relation to Tramadol usage and response to Diclofenac.
This study seeks to improve the treatment of chronic pain in people who are taking buprenorphine (also known as Suboxone, Subutex, Zubsolv). The research study is testing two different interventions along with usual clinical care: 1. Pain Self-Management (PSM): an educational program in which individuals with chronic pain work with a trained pain coach and a pain peer to explore strategies to effectively manage the daily problems that arise from chronic pain. 2. Patient-Oriented Dosing (POD): an alternative dosing of buprenorphine which will be adjusted based on pain levels. The interventions will take place over a period of 12 weeks (3 months). Additionally, participants will complete surveys every 3 months for a period of 1 year (total of 5 survey visits). Participants will receive $50 compensation for each survey visit completed (up to $250 over one year) and can receive up to an additional $100 bonus compensation. There are risks associated with participating in the study, including breach of confidentiality, psychological distress caused by discussing difficult topics, and risks associated with the POD intervention.
Patients suffering from fibromyalgia (FM) are challenged by symptoms such as chronic pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance and emotional distress. Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia can also negatively affect the relatives they live with due to their existing complaints. It is possible that their relatives accompanying them may lose their workforce due to untreated pain complaints and frequent hospital admissions. The main purpose of our study is to examine whether there is any impact on the working life of the people they live with and whether there is a decrease in their work productivity.
Background: The prevalence of comorbid insomnia is 8-10 times higher in patients with chronic pain than in the general population. Insomnia adds a considerable burden as it worsens the quality of life, restoration and repair, mental health and pain symptoms. Since pain and sleep problems are mutually reinforcing, improvements in sleep may have beneficial effects on pain. Unfortunately, the customary use of sleep medication (TAU: treatment-as-usual) often yields short-lived plus side effects. The "Sleep-Well" intervention examines if a group-based intervention program focusing on sleep literacy, sleep restriction, stimulus control and metacognitive therapy modules may perform better than TAU in improving patients' insomnia and sleep quality. Eligible patients: Investigators target adult patients referred to the University Hospital of North Norway (Tromsø) for a diagnostic evaluation of their pain condition. Patients eligible for the Sleep-Well study are those who satisfy diagnostic criteria for a non-malign pain disorder plus a comorbid insomnia sleep disorder. Patients are not eligible if they use drugs or large doses of morphine (>100 equivalents), are engaged in an insurance case due to their diagnosis, or participate in other ongoing group programs at the hospital. Aims: This trial uses a randomized semi-crossover design to examine if the Sleep-Well group does better regarding insomnia and sleep quality than the control patients (TAU). The primary outcome measures are reductions in diagnostic criteria for insomnia, self-reported insomnia symptoms, quality of life, and actigraphy-measured insomnia indicators (long sleep onset latency, frequent nightly awakenings and early morning awakening). The secondary outcome measures include a simplified polysomnography measurement of brain activity during sleep to assess if proportions or durations of slow-wave versus light-wave sleep and EEG-based arousal indices improve. In addition, it is examined if the Sleep-Well intervention incurs benefits concerning pain complaints, dysfunctional sleep and pain cognitions, anxiety and depression. The intervention: The Sleep-Well program schedules group sessions that cover four topics (sleep literacy, behavioural and mental strategies, maintenance and relapse prevention). All sessions are led by two therapists. Those randomized to the active control group (TAU) cross over to the Sleep-Well intervention three months later.