View clinical trials related to Chronic Pain.
Filter by:Patients undergoing breast surgery were divided into two groups: Intravenous Lidocaine (Lido-IV) vs Erector Spinae Block (ESP). For Lido-IV group, patients received a loading dose of Lidocaine than a continuous infusion till the end of surgery. For ESP group, an ultrasound guided ESP Block was perormed before anesthetic induction. Persistant pain post mastectomy was assessed by SFM-PQ score at 1, 3 and 6 months post surgery.
The present study seeks to follow up the cohort of adults representative of Chile's urban population whose levels of chronic pain were evaluated in March 2023 (baseline) as part of the Mental Health Thermometer (MHT) study. The study consists of a 12 month follow-up telephone interview to assess parameters of chronic pain (CP) and subtypes, mental and physical health, lifestyle and adversity and work characteristics. The study objectives are as follows: 1. Estimate the prevalence of CP and subtypes in the general population 2. Explore the association between mental health indicators, perceived work stress and presence of CP in the population. 3. Investigate the impact of CP (functional, occupational and social) among the subset of participants reporting CP 4. Describe the use of management strategies in those who suffer from CP.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to evaluate whether the ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation through a needle results in greater gains in strength and power compared to the administration of current through surface electrodes in patients undergoing strength and power assessments. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does percutaneous stimulation of the superior and inferior gluteal nerves using ultrasound-guided needles enhance strength and power more effectively than transcutaneous stimulation through electrodes? Is the effectiveness of current delivery significantly different between percutaneous and transcutaneous methods when assessed with a linear encoder in a standarized hip extension exercise? Participants will: Be randomized into two groups: one undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous stimulation of the gluteal nerves (experimental group) and the other undergoing transcutaneous stimulation through electrodes (control group). The same stimulation protocol at 10 Hz frequency with the maximum muscle contraction evoked without pain will be performed in both groups. Then, the participants will undergo strength and power assessment before and after therapy administration using a linear encoder in a hip extension exercise. Researchers will compare the experimental group to the control group to see if the method of current delivery (percutaneous vs. transcutaneous) has a significant impact on the gains in strength and power. This comparison is based on the hypothesis that percutaneous delivery of current, guided by ultrasound, is more effective than simply positioning a surface electrode for transcutaneous stimulation. The evaluation of strength and power will be performed through a linear encoder that measures peak strength and concentric power in each repetition, conducted by a blind operator unaware of the patients' group allocations.
The patient, who is experiencing chronic pain in the lower extremities persisting for more than three months, is scheduled to undergo lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. To evaluate the technical success of the sympathetic blockade, temperature and perfusion index (PI) will be measured at one-minute intervals over a 20-minute period before and after the procedure on the treated side and the opposite side foot. Additionally, other variables related to the procedure will be assessed before the procedure, after the procedure, before discharge, and during follow-up outpatient visits or phone surveys at 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of musical intervention reduces patient anxiety and provides a less painful experience during office-based procedures in a pain management clinic setting.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the PainSMART-strategy in a population of patients seeking primary care physiotherapy for pain related to muscles, joints and bones, so called musculoskeletal pain. The PainSMART-strategy consists of a digital educational film (entitled Be PainSMART:er) and a discussion based on the film at the initial physiotherapy consultation. The main questions this clinical trial aims to answer are: 1. Can the PainSMART-strategy update knowledge and beliefs about pain and aid early stage self-management of pain for participants seeking primary care physiotherapy with benign musculoskeletal pain? 2. Can the PainSMART-strategy improve evaluations of the initial physiotherapy consultation for both the patient and physiotherapist? Participating patients will be randomised into two groups. One group (intervention group) will receive the PainSMART-strategy as an adjunct to the current physiotherapy care pathway for musculoskeletal pain. The other group (control group) will follow the current physiotherapy care pathway. The two groups will be followed and compared over three months. Self-report questionnaires will be collected during the three-month period to analyse what effects the PainSMART-strategy can have on the following health outcomes: - Pain levels - Beliefs that one can remain active despite pain - Knowledge about pain - Worry about the seriousness of the pain - Expectations regarding recovery - Use of pain self-management strategies - Levels of physical activity - Absence from work due to pain - Number of referrals made for scans or x-rays, or to a specialist, for pain - Number of healthcare visits for pain during the trial period. Participating patients (both groups) and physiotherapists will also complete questionnaires to evaluate the effect of the PainSMART-strategy on the initial physiotherapy consultation.
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of integrating neural mobilization techniques into a multimodal physical exercise program for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the average time to assess secondary outcomes for each participant? - What proportion of participants adhered and/or withdrew from the study at the end of the intervention protocol? - Are there adverse events/effects associated with the intervention protocol? - What is the level of approval/satisfaction of the participants in relation to the assessment and intervention protocols? - What is the impact of the intervention protocol on participants´ pain, function, physical performance, somatosensory function, and nerve excursion (secondary outcomes)? Participants will be assessed at 3 different moments: initial assessment (T0), at the end of the intervention protocol (8 weeks) (T1) and 3 months after the end of the intervention protocol (T2). The intervention protocol will consist of a multimodal exercise program (with or without integration of neural mobilization techniques) to be carried out over a period of 8 weeks at a frequency of twice a week.
Our long-term goal is to improve pain communication for patients' health. For this project, we seek information on patients' and health care nurses' (1) mental effort when choosing or understanding, respectively, pain intensity ratings, and (2) confidence in the accuracy of pain intensity rating patterns. This information will clarify the importance of mental effort from pain ratings and the probability of pain intensity rating patterns. Our primary aim will compare patients' and nurses' perceptions of the mental effort of choosing (Aim 2a) and understanding (Aim 2b) pain intensity ratings. We hypothesize that patients will rate mental effort higher than nurses for choosing ratings and lower than nurses for understanding ratings. The results will inform future efforts to improve pain communication between patients and nurses.
Low back pain is one of the most common health problems seen in the primary care. Chronic low back pain is localized between the inferior limit of the ribs and the sacral region, and persist more than 12 weeks. In most cases, it is attributed to a non-specific cause and classified as non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). No previous study has included a multimodal supervised program in patients with NSCLBP. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of exercise + behaviour change + education + mindfulness programs (intervention 1) and an intervention including intervention 1 following functional resistance training (Intervention 2) on endogenous pain modulation, disability, muscle strength/endurance, quality of life, gait parameters, levels of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological health in patients with NSCLBP.
This study will test the newly-developed My spinal cord injury (SCI) Toolkit program in two formats - unguided use of the program and use supported by a coach. These two active treatment formats will be compared to treatment as usual (waitlist control) in adults with chronic pain and SCI. Hypotheses include: - Treatment adherence, participant satisfaction, and perception of positive change will be high and drop-out rates low for both treatments but will be better in the coached compared to the unguided arm - In terms of pre- to post-treatment changes in pain interference, coached My SCI Toolkit program will be superior to treatment as usual