View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:In the phase I part, to determine the recommended doses (RD) and dosing regimens of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB in combination with capecitabine in adult patients with gastrin releasing peptide receptor positive, estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer after progression on previous endocrine therapy in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. In the phase II part, to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of two different doses/regimens of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB in combination with capecitabine (dose optimization).
This research is being done to pilot an intervention which aims to improve participants' experiences on Endocrine Therapy. The name of the intervention used in this research study is: Endocrine Therapy Education Program (a brief, video-based intervention)
This is an exploratory, single-arm, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of T-DXd combined with pyrotinib as the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. This study is planned to recruit 3 to 12 patients in safety run-in (Part A) and 39 to 42 patients in dose expansion (Part B) in several investigational sites in China. The total number of patients enrolled in the study will be 45 to 51. Among them, 45 patients will start at the recommended dose. Patients who fulfill all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will receive T-DXd combined with pyrotinib until confirmed progressive disease. Patients will attend a safety follow up visit 40 days after last dose of T-DXd with pyrotinib. There are two main parts to this study; Part A, Combination dose finding and Parts B, Dose expansion. Tumor assessments will be performed at Screening as baseline with follow-up every 9 weeks(±7 days) from the date of first dosing date of T-DXd with pyrotinib for 54 weeks, and then every 12 weeks (±7 days) until confirmed objective disease progression. Primary Objective for Part A: To define the recommended dose of pyrotinib combined with T-DXd Recommended dose Secondary Objective for Part A: To investigate the safety and tolerability of T-DXd + pyrotinib as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Primary Objective for Part B : To determine the efficacy of T-DXd + pyrotinib as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Secondary Objective for Part B : To further determine the efficacy of T-DXd + pyrotinib as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and To further evaluate the safety and tolerability profile of T-DXd + pyrotinib as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
This is a Phase I/II Study to determine the safety and efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan and Zimberelimab with stereotactic radiation (SRS) in participants with metastatic triple negative breast cancer with brain metastases, compared to treatment with Sacituzumab Govitecan alone.
It is known that the healing process of breast cancer is accelerated thanks to the early diagnosis and effective treatment. Mammography screening is an important diagnostic method in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. It is thought that the education to be given according to the Health Belief Model will make important contributions to developing a positive attitude in breast cancer screenings and regular mammography.
This is an open-label, single arm, non-randomized, multicenter phase II study for the identification of predictive biomarkers of sacituzumab govitecan benefit and the understanding of key resistance mechanisms in HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients
The goal of this observational study is to engage with multilevel stakeholders to collaboratively and to systematically develop a suite of strategies for implementing breast cancer screening using clinical breast examination (CBE) in the primary health centers within the catchment area of Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (Bara Hospital), Johannesburg, South Africa. The main questions it aims to answer are: What barriers and facilitators exist to conducting screening CBE in Soweto's primary care setting and what implementation strategies would support CBE in primary care clinics? Participants will: - Allow observation of study clinic workflows - Participate in focus group discussions regarding screening CBE implementation
This study is a single-centre prospective observational cohort study designed to assess and compare the sensitivity and specificity of a Lunit INSIGHT MMG assisted human reading to the standard care double human reading process within mammography review at a "one-stop" breast clinic (non-inferiority study). The current imaging reporting process is a sequential double read of mammography and ultrasound (if available) images, by consultant radiologists or radiographers. The first reader produces a report which is then sent to the second reader who reviews it. If the second reader agrees with the first, this is reflected in the second reader's report which translates into a decision for further actionÍž in the event of disagreement, a third reader arbitrates and produces the final report. In the past, breast clinics have had to resort to single reader reporting due to staff shortages and high demand. This results in delays to any further assessments that may be required. It is worth noting however that despite difficulties in meeting the target, the current clinical pathway has proven to be cost effective. The Lunit INSIGHT MMG tool could generate benefits and potential efficiencies if it were introduced to the clinical service as an assistant reader within the mammography reporting process, by replacing one of the two human readers in the current standard of care. Before this can be assessed however, its non-inferiority in combination with a human reader in comparison to standard of care (double human reading) must first be established. This study will aim to address this issue in the first instance, maintaining standard of care for all patients seen within the 2 week wait pathway, by introducing the use of Lunit INSIGHT MMG into one of two arms within this prospective, observational parallel cohort study.
The EXBRAC pilot study will investigate the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, and the effect of an intervention with expressive writing. This is a pilot study with two purposes, the first is to create a questionnaire specifically developed for the ExBRAC study, and the second to evaluate the feasibility of the expressive writing.
In recent years, immune therapy has significantly altered the treatment landscape for various malignant tumors, including breast cancer. Apart from its direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, metronomic chemotherapy has the potential to modulate the immune microenvironment, thereby demonstrating substantial synergistic potential with immune therapy. In a previous prospective adaptive randomized phase II clinical trial, we identified a promising regimen involving PD-1 monoclonal antibody in combination with vinorelbine + cyclophosphamide + capecitabine (VEX) metronomic chemotherapy. Building on this foundation, we plan to conduct a multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 monoclonal antibody in combination with VEX metronomic chemotherapy for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, aiming to provide crucial evidence to guide medication for patients in advanced stages. The control group will receive metronomic oral vinorelbine 20 mg every other day + cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily + capecitabine 500 mg three times daily. The experimental group will receive additional PD-L1 inhibitor adebrelimab at a dose of 1200 mg via intravenous infusion every three weeks. Each cycle consists of three weeks, with imaging examinations conducted every six weeks (two cycles) to assess treatment efficacy. Subjects will continue medication until imaging indicates disease progression, toxicity becomes intolerable, withdrawal of informed consent, or the investigator deems it necessary to terminate medication. Evaluation will include efficacy indicators such as median progression-free survival, safety indicators like drug-related adverse reactions, patient survival quality, along with an exploratory analysis of biomarkers potentially associated with efficacy.