View clinical trials related to Bariatric Surgery Candidate.
Filter by:To establish a central database on clinical parameters for patients who has morbid obesity, which aiming at 1. to compare the results of those with or without receiving invasive bariatric treatment in Prince of Wales Hospital ( Multidiciplinary Clinic of Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery) and CUHK Medical Centre (Weight Management & Metabolic Surgery Clinic). 2. To audit and compare outcome between PWH, CUHK Medical Centre, and with other bariatric surgery centers in Hong Kong (Hong Kong Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery Registry) 3. To compare outcome with the regional/international center databse for benchmarking performance of HK bariatric surgery
Currently, a ketosis-inducing programme, usually a liquid meal replacement, is the standard of care for pre-operative dietary management. However, compliance with liduiqd meal replacement is challenging primarily due to individual taste preferences, limited variety, having to take a liquid diet, lifestyle factors, and other obstacles. Therefore, there is a need for RTE meals to enhance patient satisfaction and compliance, ultimately resulting in improved pre-operative weight loss outcomes. Hence, this RCT study aims to determine whether Very Low Calorie Diet Ready-to-eat (VLCD RTE) meals would lead to greater compliance as measured by blood ketones and meal logging via Nutritionist Buddy app (nBuddy App) compared to standard care liquid meal replacement (Optifast) prior to bariatric surgery.
A recent development is same-day discharge in bariatric surgery, this seems to be safe if proper discharge criteria are used. However, yet there is no guideline for these discharge criteria, including for patients with (potential) Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). To establish proper discharge criteria concerning OSA more information about (changes in) OSA during the first days after bariatric surgery is required. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) changes during the first and third night after Same-Day Discharge bariatric surgery in patients with potentially untreated OSA. Methods: Patients (n=60) will undergo a Home Sleep Apnea test , pre-operatively and during the first en third postoperative night after bariatric surgery to asses the AHI and sleep architecture.
Previous studies have investigated the outcomes of Knee Arthroplasty (KA) following Bariatric Surgery (BAS), but with substantial limitations as not stratifying for Body Mass Index (BMI) at time of KA or not addressing the type of BAS (gastric bypass, banding or sleeve). Since BMI varies greatly in patients with previous BAS, it is likely that BMI affects outcomes after KA in BAS-operated patients. The investigators believe that stratifying for BMI would explain the contradictions with the previous research in this patient group when it comes to the risk of revision after KA.
The best perioperative strategy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in bariatric surgery remains unclear. A strategy is to monitor patients and administer preventive oxygen therapy during the first postoperative night. However it is unknown what if preventive oxygen therapy is necessary. The goal of this trial is to compare the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in participants with or without preventive oxygen therapy. Methods: Participants are patients who underwent bariatric surgery without treated OSA and will be will be randomized into arm A or arm B: Arm A: First postoperative night in the hospital with preventive oxygen therapy (standard care), Arm B: First postoperative night in hospital without preventive oxygen therapy (intervention).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Extended Magnetic Grasper Device in patients undergoing bariatric and/or hiatal hernia procedures, as a liver retractor grasping the liver and/or the tissue surrounding the crus of the diaphragm.
This will be a prospective, obesity-registry based, single-blind randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Specific inclusion criteria are all patients eligible to undergo a Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) based on the current National Institute of Health (NIH) patient selection guidelines. Patients should be able to give consent, be deemed medically-cleared to undergo elective surgery, and tolerate general anesthesia. All enrollments and surgeries in this study will take place at the Cleveland Clinic Bariatric and Metabolic Institute. The study will consist of 2 interventions: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG). The primary objective is early postoperative pain, but also surgeon ergonomics and patient quality of life will be compared. Additional outcomes include 30-day perioperative results, minor and major morbidities, serious adverse events, resolution of medical comorbidities, and weight loss in percent of excess weight lost (%EWL) at one year.
The association between weight, and cardiovascular disease and mortality is well established, however, the causal effect of weight-loss in midlife on these outcomes is less clear. Bariatric surgery results in substantial weight-loss and is an ideal candidate to study the causal effects of weight-loss. The investigators propose a project that will use causal inference and machine learning methods to answer two important questions: 1. Is bariatric surgery effective for reducing cardiovascular disease and mortality, and if so, for who? 2. Which type of bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) is most effective, and for who? The investigators will use data from various Swedish registers to identify individuals with obesity who are eligible for bariatric surgery. We will then compare cardiovascular and mortality outcomes among those undergoing different types of bariatric surgery with those receiving non-surgical obesity management using causal inference methods. The investigators will use causal forests and expert knowledge to estimate indiviual treatment effects, and identify the groups of patients who benefit the most from these surgeries.
Bariatric Surgery for morbid obesity is indicated when BMI > 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities or BMI > 35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities. Different surgeries performed for obesity are classified as restrictive, malabsorptive, and hybrid procedures. Because laparoscopic surgery has increased the interest and growth of bariatric surgery, soaring demand for laparoscopic bariatric surgery from patients has boosted the boom in bariatric surgery worldwide. Achieving pneumoperitoneum is the initial and one of the most crucial steps in any laparoscopic surgery, giving the surgeon working space to operate on a particular organ/organ system. Usually, pneumoperitoneum is achieved either by a closed technique with a veress needle or an open technique with many variations like finger assisted or the conventional open technique. Given the excess amount of subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients, putting a veress needle to achieve pneumoperitoneum successfully is particularly challenging which takes a toll on the operating surgeon when he/she is trying to locate the midline one can either overshoot to cause omental emphysema or undershoot getting lost in the subcutaneous fat. It is usually done in the supra umbilical area. Sometimes, due to previous surgical scars other sites are preferred. Sonography is routinely used by radiologists with negligible radiation exposure. Anesthesiologists in the operating room have used it for many assisted procedures like central line insertion / giving nerve blocks. It can also be used in obese patients undergoing metabolic surgery to assist in creating pneumoperitoneum by a veress needle. Advantages of Intraoperative ultrasonography in this particular study : 1. To quantify the thickness of subcutaneous fat 2. To visualise the linea alba and guide the veress needle safely into the peritoneal cavity 3. Real-time visualisation of the pneumoperitoneum created 4. Avoid complications like omental emphysema, bowel or vascular injury
This study aims to analyze the effect of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane (LG-TAP) block compared to placebo for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. One group of participants received a (LG-TAP) block with local anesthetic while the other group received (LG-TAP) block with saline solution (placebo).