View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to compare two methods of catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The first method being a modified CLOSE protocol used for the control group and the second high density mapping guided isolation of pulmonary veins used for the interventional group. Comparison will be made according to clinical parameters and also durability of pulmonary vein isolation.
The proposed studies will test this hypothesis by randomizing patients with AF to 2-HOBA or placebo 7 days prior to AF ablation to allow 2-HOBA to reach steady-state levels. We hypothesize that tissue injury from AF ablation causes a large release of ROS that react with lipids to generate IsoLGs (Figure 2). In the absence of 2-HOBA, IsoLGs will react within seconds to form IsoLG-macromolecule adducts in atrial tissue, promoting early recurrence of AF. In the presence of 2-HOBA, IsoLGs will rapidly react to form IsoLG-macromolecule adducts in atrial tissue, promoting early recurrence of AF. In the presence of 2-HOBA, IsoLG will preferentially bind to and therefore be inactivated by 2-HOBA thereby sparing injury to the atrial tissue caused by oxidative stress and its contribution to early recurrence of AF. Early recurrence of AF will be measured by ECGs that are recorded once per day by a smartwatch (Apple Watch, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) with additional ECGs recorded by the participant if they experience symptoms of AF, or if the smartwatch alerts the participant of a possible AF episode via its auto-detection AF monitoring algorithm. The Apple Watch's AF algorithm is based on sampling of heart rate and variability and will give an audible alarm if those parameters indicate a possible episode of AF. The smartwatch records a single-lead ECG if the participant touches the watch with their contralateral hand. The day and time of the episode is also stored by the smartwatch. At the end of the 28-day follow-up period, study personnel will review the stored ECGs. Blood will be drawn prior to ablation and on post-procedure Day 1 for measurement of IsoLG-adduct levels. DNA will be extracted to explore a pharmacogenomic interaction with haplotypes at the chromosome 4q25 AF risk locus, which: 1) is strongly associated with the development of AF and the early recurrence of AF after ablation27; and 2) has been reported to be a regulator of an anti-oxidant gene program in response to cardiac injury.
Evaluation of clinical characteristics and pharmacotherapy of hospitalized Polish patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
The purpose for this study is to determine whether left posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective as ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
A prospective trial with hospitals/health centres across 6 different European countries, being randomised to either a structured education programme as the intervention or no additional education as the control. To determine whether a comprehensive educational programme for healthcare professionals will increase the rate of appropriate stroke prevention and rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and adherence to Guidelines.
The primary objective of this study is to determine if left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the WATCHMAN FLX device is a reasonable alternative to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
The investigators will compare the ablation time during pulmonary vein isolation of Ablation Index-guided high power ablation with those with conventional ablation. Ablation time of conventional group will be used from OPTIMUM study. For secondary outcomes, acute outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation using two different strategies will be compared. During 1 year of follow-up in both groups, atrial fibrillation recurrence will be evaluated. The atrial fibrillation recurrence rate at 1 year after pulmonary vein isolation will be compared between the two groups. In addition, fluoroscopic time, procedure time, and complication rates for the high power ablation group will be compared with those with conventional power.
This study will compare the effectiveness of the use of a Patient Decision Aid (PDA) and an Encounter Decision Aid (EDA) on Shared Decision Making (SDM) and health outcomes for at-risk participants with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) at 6 study sites. We hypothesize the combination of the PDA and EDA will be more effective in promoting high-quality SDM and in adoption of and adherence to anticoagulation than either tool alone.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that rate control strategy in AF is non-inferior to rhythm control strategy, in terms of stroke and mortality risk. In addition, rate control strategy is associated with lower risk of hospitalization and non-cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, rate control is an essential strategy to improve quality of life, decrease morbidity and prevent tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in AF patients. The recommended rate control agents include beta-blocker, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (CCB), digoxin and amiodarone. However, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patient, the medication of rate control were beta-blocker than digoxin. But several clinical observation study show excess mortality in AF patients. Ivabradine, a If inhibitor, it is well-established that a pacemaker current, If current, is functionally expressed in the sinus node . Previous studies have shown that Ivabradine, If inhibitor, significantly reduces sinus rate and improves prognosis in patients with systolic heart failure. Interestingly, several investigators found that hyperpolarization- activated cyclic nucleotidylated channel 4 current (HCN4), the main isoform of the channel responsible for If current, is also functionally expressed in the Atrioventricular node(AV node). Recent data have shown that inhibition of If current slows AV node conduction in animals and humans. Thus, we want to compare the effect of Ivabradine on ventricular rate with digoxin in this study.
A randomized patient-oriented trial to investigate whether continual symptomatic use of the Kardia Mobile monitoring device is a superior strategy for diagnosing Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in comparison to normal ambulatory monitoring with a 24-hour Holter monitor. Patients with referrals to an Electrophysiologist, symptoms of AF but no documentation of AF, and with at least one stroke risk factor based on the CHADS2 scoring system are randomized 1:1 to Kardia Mobile monitoring versus Holter monitoring alone.