View clinical trials related to Advanced Cancer.
Filter by:PEACOCC is a multi-centre, single arm, single stage phase II trial. The overall aim is to determine whether treatment with pembrolizumab is effective in patients with advanced clear cell gynaecological cancer.
This trial is a multicenter, prospective cohort study aiming to describe molecular profiles of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with complex genomic profiles in particular to assess the incidence of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 or ALK gene fusions to direct such patients through an ongoing clinical trial with entrectinib when appropriate. An exploratory translational program is also correlated to this trial in order to analyse immune gene expression.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether BMS-986249 both by itself and in combination with Nivolumab is safe and tolerable in the treatment of advanced solid tumors
This study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PD) and anti-tumor activity of AK105 as a single agent in adult subjects with advanced solid tumor malignancies. The study consists of a dose escalation phase (Phase 1a) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for AK105 as a single agent, and a dose expansion phase (Phase 1b) in subjects with specific tumor types which will characterize treatment of AK105 as a single agent at the MTD or RP2D.
Literature shows that less than half of advanced cancer patients accurately understand their prognosis, with most being overly optimistic. Investigators suspect that many patients are reporting not what they believe, but what they would like to believe. This study aims to discern patient's beliefs about prognosis independent of hope, to identify factors that influence patient's beliefs, and to explore patient preferences for prognostic information. Investigators propose to randomize 200 cancer patients with a prognosis of less than one year to receive one of the two versions of a survey. Investigators hypothesize that, although many patients will continue to be overly optimistic about their prognosis, those patients responding to Version 2, followed by Version 1, will provide more accurate estimates. Efforts to improve decision making require an understanding of patients' beliefs and preferences for receiving prognostic information and identifying strategies to clearly convey that information. This study will fill that gap.
Part A: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Niraparib and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part B: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part C: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Niraparib, TSR-042 and Bevacizumab and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part D: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel, TSR-042 and Bevacizumab and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part E: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Pemetrexed and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part F: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Pemetrexed, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part G: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-nab-Paclitaxel, TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part H: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-nab-Paclitaxel, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part I: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study.
TITAN-TCC (0416-ASG) is a Phase 2, open-label study of nivolumab (BMS-936558) monotherapy with additional nivolumab/ipilimumab "boost" cycles in previously untreated* and platinum-based pretreated, 2nd and 3rd line, advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma subjects. Nivolumab is a fully human PD-1 antibody which blocks the respective immune checkpoint in a ligand (PD-L1/PD-L2) independent manner. [*Update from Jan-2020: First-line cohort was stopped and the inclusion of these patients was terminated]
Many patients have cancers that have increased activity of a protein called STAT3 that contributes critically to the development and growth of their cancer. Despite our knowledge of STAT3's importance to cancer, scientists and doctors have not developed a drug that targets it and that patients can take to treat their cancer more effectively than treatments that are now available. Tvardi Therapeutics, Incorporated has developed a compound, TTI-101, which can be given by mouth and acts as a direct inhibitor of STAT3. Administration of TTI-101 to mice demonstrated that it blocked growth of cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, and liver and it was safe when administered at high doses to mice, rats, and dogs. In this application, Tvardi is proposing to further develop TTI-101 for treatment of solid tumors for which the prognosis is dismal. The investigators will determine how safe it is when administered to patients with cancer, determine whether an adequate dose can be administered to patients with cancer that will block STAT3 in their cancer, and determine whether treatment with TTI-101 leads to reduced growth of their cancer.
The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and/or bad) Pirfenidone combined with standard first-line chemotherapy will have on you and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The investigational drug Pirfenidone is being combined with standard chemotherapy in participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Pirfenidone is approved to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but it isn't currently approved to treat non-small cell lung cancer.
Immunotherapy includes a class of medication called checkpoint inhibitors, which are a relatively new medication therapy for many types of cancer which are metastatic, meaning it has spread to other parts of the body.Immune therapy medication may be given safely with radiation treatment, and in rare cases it may even make radiotherapy more effective. When radiation therapy is given in the "palliative" setting it is given to treat pain/discomfort and not necessarily shrink or get rid of the tumour. Palliative radiotherapy may be given for many reasons, but common examples include painful bone or liver tumours, brain metastases, or symptoms from a chest tumour such as feeling breathless, cough, or bleeding. Palliative radiotherapy is usually given in smaller amounts and less frequently than other types of radiation therapy. Because checkpoint inhibitors are relatively new there is not a huge amount of evidence looking at how patients respond when the treatments are combined, or in which patients immune therapy may make radiation therapy even more effective. This study is looking at the way patients who are on or about to start immune therapy and who have been recommended for palliative radiotherapy, respond to the combination of these two treatments. The purpose of this study is to describe the treatment outcomes in patients with cancer that has spread who are managed with a combination of immune therapy medication and radiotherapy. This research is being done because there is limited information about the outcomes of combined immune therapy and radiotherapy treatment from a patient's perspective, but also in terms of which patients may have a better response to combined treatment. In particular, the study aims to describe how combined treatment affects cancer not only in the area where radiotherapy is given, but also outside the part of the body that receives radiotherapy (which is called "abscopal" effect).