View clinical trials related to Advanced Cancer.
Filter by:The main objective for part 1a of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of oral TACH101 in participants with advanced and metastatic solid tumors. For part 1b, the main objective is the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by radiographic progression measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I/II basket study, evaluating the safety, tolerability, RP2D, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumor activity of EOS-448 (also known as GSK4428859A or belrestotug) combined with standard of care and/or with investigational therapies in participants with advanced solid tumors.
Background: People with advanced cancer experience fatigue and loss of functioning, which often worsens as their cancer progresses. Rehabilitation programs may help to reduce fatigue and improve overall physical function. People with advanced cancer who live in rural and remote areas lack access to cancer-specific rehabilitation and exercise expertise to manage complex symptoms of high intensity. Their access to in-person services at tertiary sites are further reduced due to public health requirements for physical distancing during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Aim: To test the feasibility of a virtual program delivered by a team of cancer-specific rehabilitation, exercise and pain and symptom experts for remote and rural patients with advanced cancer to address their symptoms, functioning and quality of life. Design: The virtual program will be tailored to the individual person, and consist of online exercise modules, online supervised interactive group class and one-to-one virtual meetings with an exercise or rehabilitation specialist and a palliative care physician. Relevance: This study will determine whether a virtual multidisciplinary rehabilitation and exercise program is feasible for people with advanced cancer. Further, it will provide insight on how fatigue and loss of functioning can best be managed for this population in remote and rural locations.
Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: palliative care recommends discussing advance care planning (ACP) when patients' estimated life expectancy is reduced from a year to months. Discussions about ACP focus on communication among patients, their caregivers, and healthcare providers to achieve cancer-related treatment and care consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals. ACP can improve outcomes for patients and caregivers; however, provision of ACP to patients remain low. This may be because of the complexity of ACP in clinical practice. A Question Prompt List (QPL) is a structured question list encouraging patients to put forward their queries to physicians and promote discussion between patients and physicians during medical consultations. Our preliminary study found that for patients with advanced cancer after standard chemotherapy, face-to-face interventions by nurses or clinical psychologists using a QPL about treatment and care, which is consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals promoted empathetic communication between patients and their physicians. In recent years, however, ensuring adequate time during outpatient visits has become difficult due to increased numbers of outpatients and shortages of corresponding medical personnel. Therefore, intervention methods not restricted by location or time are needed. Thus, the investigators develop a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, including a QPL, to facilitate discussions about patients' values and goals with their physicians. Purpose: This study examines whether a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, which intends to promote ACP discussions in earlier stages of advanced cancer treatment, improves such communication behaviors of patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. Main contents of the intervention: Patients in the intervention group are provided a mobile-based empathetic communication support program-a mobile application (app). The app comprises a QPL (46 questions in eight categories) and questions about the patient's preferred treatment and end-of-life care based on their values and goals. After registering on the app, patients are first given a program overview and instructions for using the app. Then, they proceed with the content themselves, at home or anywhere else, at any time. Between app registration and the next outpatient visit, the patient is interviewed (by phone or in person) by a nurse or a clinical psychologist, who helps them prepare for the discussion with the physician and asks questions based on the patient's app responses for 30 minutes to an hour. During the outpatient visit, patients and their physicians are provided feedback based on the interview. Study participants: Overall, 264 patients with advanced or recurrent cancer are recruited from four departments (respiratory medicine, gastroenterology, hepatobiliary medicine, and oncology) in the outpatient clinic of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Outcome measurement: The primary outcome of this trial is the Reassurance and Emotional support score of physician behavior measured using the SHARE model at the first visit after the intervention. SHARE is a conceptual communication skills model comprising 26 items and four subscales, categorized as S: Supportive environment, H: How to deliver bad news, A: Additional information, and RE: Reassurance and Emotional support. Reassurance and Emotional support assesses physicians' behavior in providing reassurance and addressing patients' emotions with empathetic responses (e.g., remaining silent out of concern for patient's feelings or accepting patient's expression of emotions). The conversation between patients and the physicians is audio-recorded, and a third person's impression of the physician's communication behavior during the outpatient consultation is scored on a 5-point scale from 0: not applicable at all to 4: strongly applicable. Scoring will be conducted by multiple raters blinded to the assignment. Raters are trained in conversation analysis with a manual, and inter- and intra-rater agreements will be checked in advance. Secondary outcomes are as follows: 1) the patient-physician behavioral assessment based on the conversation analysis manual, 2) number of conversations about ACP, 3) psychological distress, 4) quality of life, 5) medical care use, 6) app use, 7) feasibility of intervention program, 8) patients' satisfaction of the consultation, 9) care goals, and 10) preferred place for future care. The investigators chose these outcomes for their comparability with previous studies.
TQB3824 blocks function of a specific protein called Cell Division Cycle 7 (CDC7) kinase in the human body, which plays important roles in the maintenance of DNA replication forks and DNA damage response pathways. This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of TQB3824.
This study is a multicenter, Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of AGEN1777 as a single agent and when used in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor in participants with advanced, metastatic solid tumors.
This study will test the safety of the study drug, repotrectinib, in combination with chemotherapy (irinotecan and temozolomide) in children and young adults who have advanced or metastatic solid tumors. We researchers will try to find the highest dose of the study drug that causes few or mild side effects in study participants. When the researchers find this dose, we will evaluate it in a different group of participants to find out whether repotrectinib in combination with chemotherapy is an effective treatment for children and young adults who have advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Another purpose of the study is to look at the way the body absorbs, distributes, and gets rid of repotrectinib.
This clinical trial is evaluating a drug called ART4215 in participants with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The main goals of this study are to: - Find the recommended dose of ART4215 that can be given safely to participants alone and in combination with talazoparib - Learn more about the side effects of ART4215 alone and in combination with talazoparib - Learn more about the effectiveness of ART4215 alone and in combination with talazoparib - Learn more about the effectiveness of ART4215 alone and in combination with niraparib
This study will evaluate safety, tolerability, drug levels, molecular effects and clinical activity of MRTX849 (adagrasib) in combination with BI 1701963 in patients with advanced solid tumors that have a KRAS G12C mutation.
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide and the mortality ranks first in the world. In recent years, with the development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the overall survival of lung cancer patients has improved significantly. However, the inoperable advanced tumor remains the main reason for the poor prognosis of lung cancer. Thus, we aim to carry out this single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgery after conversion therapy for locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer.