View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to find out whether tinengotinib in combination with abiraterone acetate and prednisone or enzalutamide is a safe treatment that causes few or mild side effects in people with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Currently, patients suspected of having prostate cancer undergo an MRI followed by targeted biopsies of any suspicious lesions under trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. This pathway is labour, time, and cost-intensive. Additionally, TRUS-MRI-Fusion devices are needed, which overlay the MRI scan onto the TRUS used for biopsies. This can lead to targeting errors due to mismatched images. Although biopsies can be performed in the MRI scanner to reduce these errors, it requires a significant amount of time within an expensive MRI scanner in the radiology department, along with special MRI-compatible equipment. Portable MRI technology has the potential to reduce these errors and streamline the diagnostic pathway to one visit. The Promaxo portable MRI is an FDA-cleared MRI device for MR-guided procedures. It uses a novel "truly" open MRI with an unobstructed field of view and a central aperture for robotic-guided intervention and has a limited footprint, allowing it to be placed in a standard operating theatre or large clinic room. The strength of the magnet is also low enough that special precautions and equipment are not needed to take biopsies. The intention is to conduct a study that answers the following research question: How does the accuracy of targeted biopsies of the prostate performed under the guidance of a portable MRI scanner compare to TRUS-MRI-fusion biopsies? Design: A single-arm, single-center IDEAL stage 2a study (n=85 patients) of patients undergoing prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer, where each patient would undergo both a portable MRI-registered biopsy and a TRUS-image-fusion biopsy. To reduce the risk of bias between the two modalities, the order of the modality will be randomized 1:1. There will be no blinding of the surgeon. The primary outcome will be the technical feasibility of performing portable MRI and portable MRI-targeted biopsies and estimates on cancer detection.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SpaceIT™ Hydrogel System in patients undergoing External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer.
This is a phase 1 dose escalation trial of ZM008, an anti-LLT1 antibody as a single agent followed by combination with Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors who have exhausted all standard therapy available or are intolerant of the same.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) using NanoKnife technology in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This patient population was chosen because they would otherwise be treated with conventional therapies with high side effects. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the NanoKnife system is effective at damaging prostate tumour cells, and killing the cancer? 2. Are there any safety concerns with the procedure, or major side effects caused by the treatment? Participants will undergo IRE treatment with the NanoKnife system, and then complete follow-up appointments for 12-months after the procedure.
A Study of STM-416p Administered Intraoperatively to Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
Single-center, non-commercial phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate 177Lu-PSMA as a systemic adjuvant treatment in patients with high and very high risk prostate cancer after radical treatment using locoregional teleradiotherapy and hormone therapy
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of a newly developed training concept on men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The main questions it aims to answer are: - How feasible and safe is the new training concept? - How efficient is the training concept to counteract side effects caused by ADT? Researchers will compare the new training concept with usual care to evaluate how efficient the training concept is to counteract the ADT-related side effects. Participants in the intervention group will perform the new training concept twice weekly for 12 weeks. Participants in the control group will only receive usual care. All participants will visit the laboratory at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks to measure the primary and secondary outcomes.
Lead4Care is an observational, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effectiveness, tolerance, and cost-effectiveness of triple against double therapy in matched groups of mHSPC patients with high tumor burden. In addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the triple constitutes of docetaxel and novel hormonal therapy (NHT), and the double of NHT therapy in addition to ADT. Their effectiveness is compared in terms of mortality and morbidity, which is captured by HRQoL, pain, fatigue. Potential side effects are captured by neuropathy, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety, sickness, and dyssomnia. The cost-effectiveness is evaluated within a Markov model from a societal perspective in which the main disease stages are mHSPC, mCRPC and death. In connection with a regular visit in hospital care, prostate cancer patients who in addition to ADT will initiate double or triple therapy are offered participation in the study. If they consent on-line, they will receive 13 online surveys over a 60-month period. The surveys are sent with an interval of two months for the first six months, quarterly thereafter until two years, and thereafter yearly. Once all participants have been recruited, the baseline data shared by healthcare personnel and patients will be enriched with registry data. This baseline and registry data involves information about the patients' historical and current health- and socioeconomic status. Thereby, Lead4Care will be able to identify comparable groups of patients on triple and double treatments by using advanced matching methods. In order to assure an objective analysis, Lead4Care will not allow any data extraction until Lead4Care has predefined and published all details regarding the comparison. The existing protocol is then complemented with information on exactly which patients will be compared across triple and double therapy, and how outcomes will be compared. For these treatments, the main objectives are to: - Compare mortality and morbidity on triple and double therapy, and their relative side-effects. - Capture patient preferences for these different treatment outcomes over time. - Evaluate cost-effectiveness of triple versus double therapy from a societal perspective.
PSW-1025 is administered intravenously to patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer to evaluate its tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, absorbed dose, and efficacy, as well as to determine the recommended dose for Phase II.