View clinical trials related to Prostate Cancer.
Filter by:This study is designed to assess the effect of catheter size on postoperative catheter pain, urinary continence, urinary flow rates, post void residuals, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), and Quality of Life (QoL) score, as well as long term complications after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effect of multiple once daily administrations of enzalutamide on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of digoxin (P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) substrate) in participants with prostate cancer. This study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple once daily administrations of enzalutamide alone and in combination with a single dose of digoxin (P-gp substrate) and rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate) in participants with prostate cancer, as well, assess the pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide and its active metabolite.
This trial will evaluate the use of one versus two DNA vaccines, delivered concurrently with PD-1 blockade using pembrolizumab followed by treatment with pembrolizumab alone, and delivered over a prolonged period of time (for a maximum of 2 years (32 cycles) or until radiographic progression) on the treatment of castrate-resistant, metastatic prostate cancer. The hypothesis to be tested is that delivering two vaccines with PD-1 blockade will elicit a greater frequency and magnitude of tumor-directed CD8+ T cells, and thereby increase the percentage of patients experiencing objective anti-tumor effect as measured by PSA declines and/or objective radiographic responses. Participants must be 18 years of age or older and can expect to be on treatment for 2 years (32 cycles) and on study for up to 4 years (including 2 years of follow up via phone).
This is an open-label Phase II modular study in participants with prostate cancer which will assess safety, efficacy, and tolerability of AZD4635 in combination with other therapeutic agents in different treatment arms (referred to as modules). Combinations to be studied include: 1) Module 1: AZD4635 plus durvalumab; 2) Module 2: AZD4635 plus oleclumab.
The purpose of this research study is to collect information on a new treatment of prostate tissue participants with intermediate risk prostate cancer using a medical device called the Poseidon System. The Poseidon System is intended to ablate prostate tissue in areas of the prostate where cancer has been identified. The medical device delivers thermal energy in the form of water vapor to the prostate tissue through the urethra. Previous research has shown successful prostate tissue ablation. Additional research may help show successful ablation of the prostate tissue where cancer is located.
This is a Phase Ib, open-label, multi-centre study to determine the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of capivasertib when given in combination with novel agents (enzalutamide or abiraterone) to inform the selection of capivasertib dose regimens for each combination for further clinical evaluation when given to patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The study design allows an exploration of different doses with intensive safety monitoring to ensure the safety of the patients.
Single-arm, open-label, phase II trial in 200 competent adult male patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-3 and progressive metastatic prostate cancer, failing, failed, refused, not eligible for or no access to further approved lines of therapy. Patients will undergo sequential FDG positron emission tomography (PET) and 18F-DCFPyL PET to assess FDG/DCFPyL concordance fraction. Patients with DCFPyL/FDG concordance of 50% or greater will be treated with 131I-PSMA-1095 radioligand therapy (RLT). Best post-treatment serum prostate specific antigen response will be compared to concordance fraction.
As the most common male carcinoma, prostate cancer is a major tumor entity in oncology. In addition to definitive radiotherapy, surgical procedure is considered to be an oncologically equivalent therapeutic alternative for non-metastatic malignancies in the primary setting. However, a subsequent radiotherapy of the prostate bed is often necessary, which takes place as an "adjuvant" treatment immediately after surgery or in the course of a repeated increase in PSA and usually extends over several weeks. For the primary situation (without previous surgery), several randomized phase III clinical trials have shown that it is possible to shorten radiotherapy by increasing the single dose (called hypofractionation). In the context of two prospective Phase II studies, which were carried out in Heidelberg, it has since been shown that hypofractionation with both photons and protons is safe and feasible even in the postoperative situation. The current, prospective and randomized PAROS study is now intended to demonstrate a multicentric phase III study as an improvement in the quality of life caused by rectum toxicity (primary endpoint) by the use of protons. The oncological non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy after surgery is a secondary endpoint.
This study evaluates the difference between 2 prostate biopsy methods, transrectal (through the rectal wall) and transperineal (through the skin) needle biopsy. Men who are in need of prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicions of prostate cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either transrectal or transperineal approach. This research study will scientifically determine if one biopsy method is better than the other in reducing complications and improving cancer detection.
Personalisation of radiotherapy dose based on real-time assessments of normal tissue and tumour response would maximise cure and minimise treatment related toxicity. During a 5 fraction course of prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) this pilot study will assess whether a number of different biomarker approaches can predict for normal tissue and tumour response. Firstly the investigators will analyse volatile organic compounds released within the breath with each fraction of treatment. Secondly the investigators will analyse cell free normal tissue and tumour DNA released during treatment. Thirdly the investigators will develop imaging processing algorithms to look for imaging biomarkers predicting rectal wall toxicity using pre and post treatment cone beam CT verification images. Each of these approaches will be assessed against prostate specific antigen (PSA), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) criteria and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) patient reported outcomes with a maximum of 24 months of follow up.