View clinical trials related to Pain.
Filter by:The investigators plan a prospective randomized study to see whether negative questions affect measures of mood, pain, or disability. A total of 175 patients will participate at Massachusetts General Hospital.
To assess the safety and effectiveness one dose of a new pain reliever medicine (JNJ-10450232 at either the 250 or 1000 mg strength) compared with placebo (sugar pill) or acetaminophen 1000 mg after surgical removal of third molars. The primary endpoint will evaluate pain relief effectiveness up to 6 hours after administration of the study drug.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate (LE) ophthalmic gel, 0.38% (BID)
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, pharmacokinetic properties (the absorption, distribution and excretion), and analgesic activity of Omnitram (10 mg tablets), Tramadol (Ultram, 50 mg tablet) following oral administration of 9 doses healthy subjects.
Subjects are being asked to participate in this study because they have an arm or leg amputation and have developed pain related to a neuroma (an ongoing localized pain related to a cut nerve ending). We are studying two different types of surgery to treat the neuroma pain. Today there are many surgical options reported which often means that there is no one best treatment. The surgery that shows the best success so far, involves cutting out the scarred nerve ending (neuroma) and burying the freshly cut nerve ending in a nearby muscle. Recently, a new surgery has been developed called targeted reinnervation (TR). This surgery connects these cut nerve endings to nerves going into nearby nonfunctional muscles. This surgery was developed to allow amputees to have better prosthesis control. By chance, neuroma pain improved significantly with TR. We, therefore, are conducting this clinical trial to evaluate which of these two surgeries best treats neuroma pain. We will ask all participants to fill out a questionnaire both before and after surgery. This will help us understand how a neuroma affects the quality of life of amputees and will allow us to understand which surgery leads to the best improvement in neuroma pain. In order to confirm the presence and location of the neuroma before surgery, a magnetic resonance image (MRI) will be performed. Taking these pictures requires subjects to lie still for a short period of time but does not involve any invasive procedures. After surgery, the MRI will be done again, this time to see if the nerve shows signs of scarring.
Pain on injection of propofol is a comman problem. The investigators planned to evaluate the effect of propofol-fentanyl mixture on propofol injection pain and compare it with fentanyl pretreatment and control groups. Following ethics committee approval, 150 ASA I,II patients (18-65 yr) undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled to this study. Exclusion criteria were communication difficulty, psychiatric, neurologic disorders and history of allergy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of tree equal groups. Before the anesthesia induction, Group C (Control, n=50) and group M (mixture, n=50) received 5 ml isotonic saline, group F (fentanyl, n=50)received 2micgr/kg fentanyl. 10 seconds after the study drugs had been given, a standart question about the comfort of the injection was asked to the patient. The investigators used the verbal rating scale (VRS) for evaluation of propofol injection pain. Statistical analyses were performed with Student's t and Fisher's exact tests; p value <0,05 was considered significant. Demographic data was similar among the groups (table I) In group M, the number of the patients having propofol injection pain was significantly lower compared to groups F and C (p<0,001 for both) None of the patients in groups F and M experienced severe pain whereas 24 patients (48%) had severe pain in group C (p<0.001 for both). This study shown that fentanyl-propofol mixture is more effective compared to both fentanyl pretreatment and placebo in preventing propofol injection pain.
This research study is being conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of a new topical medication (MFC51123) that contains two active ingredients (diclofenac and menthol) in two formulation packages. One formulation package is in the form of a gel in aluminum tube and the other one in the form of a gel in roll-on applicator bottle. Additionally, as a comparison, the pharmacokinetic properties of a marketed diclofenac gel and an oral diclofenac treatment will also be characterized. This topical diclofenac/menthol gel has being developed to treat mild to moderate pain and inflammation, such as acute sport injuries, sprains and strains. The rationale for conducting the study is to prove that repeated topical treatment of the new diclofenac + menthol formulation in either of the two packages does not result in unsafe systemic exposure.
This is a Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, parallel group, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled evaluation of the analgesic efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ketamine sublingual wafer in adult subjects who experience post operative pain after undergoing third molar extraction.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a single dose of EXPAREL (133 mg/10 mL) administered intraoperatively per normal infiltration for prolonged analgesia in 12 adult subjects undergoing tonsillectomy with or without removal of the adenoids.
In mainland China, knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability in older persons. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is now generally regarded by orthopaedic surgeons and patients as an effective treatment for end-stage knee OA in order to relieve pain, correct joint deformity and improve the life quality of patients.However, TKA has been called as one of the most painful Orthopedics surgery due to the weight bearing characteristics of knee joint and the high demand of functional exercise within the 6-8 weeks post operation. The targeted application of selective cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 inhibitor, such as Parecoxib or Celecoxib, can significantly reduce the level of inflammatory reaction one and two days postoperation . In addition, the perioperative administration of Celecoxib can directly or indirectly relieve postoperative pain, improve articular function and eventually augment life quality of the patients . Recently, effective treatment of post-operative pain with intravenous followed by oral COX-2 specific inhibitor has been demonstrated in many post-operative pain models . Significant morphine sparing effect and reduction of opioid distressed symptoms were also observed. In China, many surgeons have accept it as a routine strategy for controlling pain post TKA to sequentially give parecoxib 40 mg intravenously twice daily for the first 3 days post surgery and then Celecoxib 200mg orally twice daily. Although satisfactory results of this combination treatment on short-term pain reduction and functional improvement has been observed in clinical practice, high quality evidence is still lacking to prove its effect on the medium or long-term functionality recovery. This study is being conducted to investigate the combination regimen with intravenous parecoxib followed by oral celecoxib for post-surgical analgesic treatment in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplastic (TKA) surgery. Subjects will receive double-blinded study medication consisting of parecoxib injection in analgesic doses or matching placebo followed by oral celecoxib in acute pain doses or matching placebo in a double-blinded fashion. The hypothesis is subjects treated with parecoxib/celecoxib will consume less morphine over the first 24 hours of postoperation period, achieve improved pain control over study period, a quicker return to functionality, and has less opioid adverse events than those treated with opioids alone over 6-week recovery phase.