Clinical Trials Logo

Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pain.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02678416 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Reduction in Pain Intensity Following IV or Oral Pain-relieving Products

Start date: December 7, 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two experimental pain models to see if they would be useful for comparing different products for reduction in pain intensity. The models evaluated were the ultraviolet-B (UVB) burn and intradermal capsaicin experimental pain models. Medications compared were a single dose each, of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen, oral acetaminophen, placebo, and IV morphine.

NCT ID: NCT02673372 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Geriatric Ketamine for Pain Management Study

Start date: April 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This research project is geared towards geriatric analgesia in the Emergency Department (ED) with a goal of reducing the administration of opioid pain medications to elderly patients, thereby avoiding the commonly occurring, severe side effects associated with such medications, including hypotension, respiratory depression, altered mental status, delirium, as well as nausea/vomiting and constipation. The primary outcome of the study will be difference in pain score from baseline to 30 minutes post-medication administration. This project has the potential to change and modify the ED approach to geriatric analgesia by virtue of minimizing the use of opioid administration in elderly patients. T

NCT ID: NCT02671578 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Bispectral Index and Clinical Parameters Evaluation in Dental Procedures

BIS-01
Start date: November 2006
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

BACKGROUND: The degree of consciousness during nitrous oxide use is still a matter of concern for both dentists and anesthesiologists. Investigators hypothesized that BIS levels do not vary according nitrous oxide concentration during minimum to moderate sedation in the dental treatment. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing dental procedures demanding local anesthesia (1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine) were enrolled in this study. Initial pain and anxiety were measured by 11-point numerical and anxiety visual scales, respectively. Systolic/diastolic arterial blood pressure, SpO2, heart and respiratory rates, and psychomotor ability (Trieger test) were assessed before, during and after dental treatment. Sedation levels were evaluated by both BIS and sedation analogic scale at the same intervals. The duration of treatment along with nitrous oxide concentration and side effects were observed. Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests were used (alpha=5%).

NCT ID: NCT02671409 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Translational Study of the Effects of Neural Mobilization in Patients With Lomboisquiatalgia

Start date: October 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The spinal nerve injury in humans often results in neuropathic pain characterized by spontaneous burning pain accompanied by allodynia and hyperalgesia. In this sense, lomboisquiatalgia is a neuropathy that is characterized by narrowing the intervertebral foramen of the lumbar vertebrae, leading a lumbar chronic pain which irradiate to a lower limb, being a clinical condition of difficult treatment. Neural Mobilization is a noninvasive technique used by physiotherapists. The technique aims to restore mobility and elasticity of the peripheral nervous system by tenses which are imposed on the roots, nerves, spinal cord and their respective meninges. This technique has been standardized in basic research and has shown promising results. However, clinically, this technique lacks randomized, controlled and double blind studies. Therefore, the investigators have to evaluate the effects of Neural Mobilization technique in patients with lomboisquiatalgia. In this study the investigators will treat patients three times a week, with ten minute treatment time per session, with 25 oscillations per minute for ten sessions. Many tools will be used to assess the effects of the protocol applied, for example: evaluation sheet, visual analogue scale (VAS), quality of life assessment - WHOQOL-bref questionnaire of Roland Morris disability, oswestry index on disability (version 2.0), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the measurement of cytokines in the blood tissue. In this way, the investigators can contribute and understand the mechanisms involved in the rehabilitation process.

NCT ID: NCT02669004 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Epidural Infusion for Posterior Spinal Fusion After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Start date: June 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Patient-controlled Intermittent epidural bolus versus epidural infusion for posterior spinal fusion after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis surgery is commonly performed in adolescent due to idiopathic scoliosis. It is reported that the postoperative pain after scoliosis surgery that occurs due to Surgical trauma and severe reflex muscle spasm be severe and excruciating. There are many methods for postoperative pain management. It is used often opioid , paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with patient- controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA). In addition; intrathecal opioids, one catheter epidural with intermittent dosing bolus of morphine or continuous infusion (either opioids or local anaesthetics or both), double epidural catheter with continuous infusion and intravenous ketamine infusion were preferred other postoperative pain management models. Epidural analgesia is accepted procedure with the efficacy and safety profile for postoperative pain management in major orthopedic surgery including scoliosis surgery. Epidural analgesia techniques commonly have been used in continuous infusion of local anesthetics with or without opioid. It was emphasized that there was not adequate data in the literature to provide argument concerning the use of epidural opioids after spinal surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the effects and side effects patient- controlled intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (PCIEA) and patient- controlled continuous epidural analgesia (PCCEA) with morphine for postoperative pain control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spinal fusion. Methods The study was conducted after obtaining written consent from all patients and guardian, approval from the Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee. This prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study was conducted 47 patient between 8-18 years, American Society of Anesthesia Classification (ASA) I-II, with idiopathic scoliosis, scheduled for elective posterior spinal fusion. Patients with a history of allergy to the drugs used in the study protocol, drug abused , preoperative neurologic deficit, inability to use a visual analogue scale, pulmonary, cardiac and neuropsychiatric disorders were excluded. Exclusion criteria during the study were accidental perforation of dura, faulty epidural catheter placement, postoperative neurologic deficit or uncontrollable nausea, vomiting and pruritus. The patients who were not premedicated were instructed on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device that was implanted during the postoperative period. Patients were divided into two groups using the envelope drawing method. Patients who received epidural morphine with PCIEA represented Group 1, epidural morphine with PCCEA represented Group 2. The anesthetist who collected data and the patients were blinded. All operations were performed by the same surgical team. The posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws was applied to thoracic and lumbar spine. Epidural catheter was inserted by surgeon under direct visualization at the midpoint of the incision and advanced 5-6 cm cephalad to thoracic 4-5 before surgical closure. Intubated patients was taken to in the reanimation intensive care unit after operation, IV acetaminophen 15 mg / kg was started before extubation and repeated every 6 hours. After extubation and a neurological examination, patients in the PCİEA group received morphine 50 µg/kg in 10 mL bolus, lockout time 1 hour, no infusion. In Group 2, PCECA infusion the following initial setting loading morphine 0.02mg/kg in 8mL, was maintained 0.01 mg/kg continuous infusion 4mL, 0.05 mg/kg 2mL bolus dose. 30 minute lock-out interval. 4 hour limit was 4 mg/kg. Pain score, morphine usage, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, rate their satisfaction ,sedation scores and motor block were assessed by researchers who were blinded to the study groups at postoperatively 2., 4., 6., 8., 12., 18., ve 24.hour, in all patients.

NCT ID: NCT02668094 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

The Effect of Pregabalin on Pain of Propofol Injection

Start date: February 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pain is a common side effect of propofol injection. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of pregabalin and lidocaine in reducing propofol injection pain.

NCT ID: NCT02667860 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Intra-corporeal vs Extra-corporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopically Assisted Right Hemicolectomy

Start date: May 20, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis during right hemicolectomy is regarded as superior than the extracorporeal anastomosis in terms of recovery of peristalsis, aesthetic results, analgesia requirements and length of hospital stay. The objective of this study is to compare the postoperative results of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

NCT ID: NCT02666846 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Assess the Efficacy and Safety in Volunteers of DCF100, TIB200 and SPR300 vs. Placebo and Control(s) in a UV Pain Model

Start date: March 2015
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomised, double blind, cross over clinical study in healthy human volunteers (including pharmacokinetic [PK] sampling and laser Doppler assessment of local blood flow in a subset of up to 6 subjects per cohort of 20) to assess the efficacy and safety of three different topical analgesics (DCF100, TIB200 and SPR300) versus placebo and active control(s) in a model of UV-induced inflammatory pain.

NCT ID: NCT02665533 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Two Pharmacological Protocols for Pre-emptive Analgesia in Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Start date: January 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The main aim of the study is to investigate the pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone and diclofenac associated to codeine to prevent the pain, edema and limited mouth opening at the extraction of third molar.

NCT ID: NCT02664896 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Pain Phenotypes in Knee Osteoarthritis

Start date: April 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Recently, the medical community has learned damage to the knee joint may be one of many possible reasons for pain in knee osteoarthritis. Psychological factors and other aspects of brain function seem to play an important role in the pain experience. Although research studies have examined these factors on an individual basis, no study has examined all of these factors in the same population. Furthermore, some measures of brain function- having to do with perception of the painful body part- have yet to be examined in knee osteoarthritis. The investigators plan to study many of these variables in a group of people with knee osteoarthritis, as well in some healthy controls (without knee pain), in order to establish the relative importance of these measures in contributing to pain, as well as validate new measures of perception in people with knee osteoarthritis. We also plan to use a statistical tool- known as latent profile analysis- to look at subgroups of knee osteoarthritis pain. The hypothesis is that different people experience pain in knee osteoarthritis for different reasons. This study will be the first study to use all of these different variables- which can be reproduced in a clinical setting- to look for different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis pain. Ultimately, the goal is to help clinicians better prioritize and target interventions to individual patients. The investigators believe this will lead to better outcomes and fewer treatment complications currently associates with pharmaceutical and surgical interventions that are widely used to treat knee osteoarthritis.