Clinical Trials Logo

HIV Infections clinical trials

View clinical trials related to HIV Infections.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00120185 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Efficacy of Using Interleukin-2 in Antiretroviral Naïve HIV Patients (ANRS119)

Start date: December 2003
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) increases the number of CD4 cells in HIV-1 infected patients under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with a CD4 cell count over 200/mm3, but its activity in patients without antiretroviral therapy is unknown. This study will test the efficacy and safety of IL-2 in naïve patients with a CD4 count between 300 and 500/m3.

NCT ID: NCT00119873 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Safety of and Immune Response to an Experimental HIV Vaccine (VRC-HIVADV014-00-VP) in HIV Uninfected Adults

Start date: n/a
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of and immune response to an experimental HIV vaccine in HIV uninfected individuals.

NCT ID: NCT00119769 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

The Effect of Low-Dose Human Growth Hormone Therapy in HIV Infected Patients

Start date: February 2005
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of low-dose human growth hormone therapy on immune status and fat morphology.

NCT ID: NCT00119548 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Improving HIV Screening With Nurse-Based Rapid Testing/Streamlined Counseling

Start date: March 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: HIV testing is cost-effective in unselected general medical populations, yet testing rates among those at-risk remain low, even among those with regular primary care. HIV rapid testing is effective in many healthcare settings but scant research has been done within primary care settings, nor within the US Department of Veteran's Affairs Healthcare System. Objectives: We evaluated three methods proven effective in other diseases/settings: Nurse standing orders for testing, streamlined counseling, and HIV rapid testing. Design: Randomized, controlled trial with three intervention models: Model A (traditional counseling/testing); Model B (nurse-initiated screening, traditional counseling/testing); Model C (nurse-initiated screening, streamlined counseling/rapid testing). Participants: 251 patients with primary/urgent care appointments in two VA clinics in the same city (one large urban hospital, one freestanding outpatient clinic in a high HIV prevalence area) Measurements: Rates of HIV testing and receipt of results; sexual risk reduction; HIV knowledge improvement. Results: Testing rates were 40.2% (Model A), 84.5% (Model B), and 89.3% (Model C) (p=<.01). Test receipt rates were 14.6% (Model A), 31.0% (Model B), 79.8% (Model C) (all p=<.01). Sexual risk reduction and knowledge improvement did not differ significantly between counseling methods. Conclusions: Streamlined counseling with rapid testing significantly increased testing and receipt rates over current practice without changes in risk behavior or post-test knowledge. Increased testing and receipt of results could lead to earlier disease identification, increased treatment and reduced morbidity/mortality. Policymakers should consider streamlined counseling/rapid testing when implementing routine HIV testing into primary/urgent care.

NCT ID: NCT00119379 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Nucleoside Supplementation and Substituting Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Other Drugs in Anti-HIV Regimens in Reversing Fat Loss in HIV Infected Adults

Start date: April 2005
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

HIV lipoatrophy is a condition marked by fat loss; it occurs in many patients taking antiretroviral (ARV) therapy that includes nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Lipoatrophy may be related to mitochondrial toxicity, a condition that can damage the heart, nerves, muscles, kidneys, and liver, and can affect the body's ability to produce energy. NucleomaxX is a food supplement consisting of a sugar cane extract high in nucleosides, which are building blocks that may counteract the negative effects of NRTIs. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is an NRTI that may cause less lipoatrophy than other drugs in its class, such as zidovudine (ZDV) or stavudine (d4T). The purpose of this study is to determine whether nucleoside supplementation with NucleomaxX and substitution of TDF for ZDV or d4T in an ARV regimen can reverse fat loss caused by mitochondrial toxicity in HIV infected adults. Study hypotheses: 1) The substitution of TDF for d4T or ZDV in patients with HIV lipoatrophy will result in an increase in mitochondrial DNA content in fat, skeletal muscle, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which in turn will lead to an improvement in mitochondrial function as assessed by electron transport chain (ETC) and oxidative phosphorylation pathway (OXPHOS) activity. The latter should lead to a decrease in fat apoptosis and in mitochondrial and lipid oxidative damage biomarkers. 2) Supplementation with uridine (via NucleomaxX) will increase mtDNA content in adipose tissue and increase body fat content.

NCT ID: NCT00119106 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Bangkok Tenofovir Study, an HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Trial, Bangkok, Thailand

Start date: June 2005
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary goals of this study are to assess the safety and efficacy of daily tenofovir to prevent parenteral HIV infection among injection drug users (IDUs). Assessment of changes in HIV associated risk behaviors, adherence to study drug, and, among IDU who become HIV-infected during the trial, evaluation of HIV viral load set point, CD4 counts, genetic characterization of infecting HIV viruses, and antiretroviral resistance will also be done.

NCT ID: NCT00118898 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Efavirenz or Atazanavir/Ritonavir Given With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate or Abacavir/Lamivudine in HIV Infected Treatment-Naive Adults

Start date: September 2005
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Currently, the preferred anti-HIV regimens used in the United States consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz (EFV). However, with new anti-HIV drugs being approved, alternative regimens need to be tested to determine if new drug combinations have increased effectiveness in treating HIV. The purpose of this study is to test the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of four different regimens in HIV-infected adults who have never taken anti-HIV drugs.

NCT ID: NCT00118677 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Long-Term Supervised Treatment Interruption in HIV-Infected Patients

Start date: February 2003
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This trial is aimed at studying the safety of long term supervised treatment interruption in HIV infected patients with CD4 over 350/mm3 and plasma HIV RNA under 50 000/mL. Another aim of this study is to assess the immunological and virological factors associated with the duration of treatment interruption.

NCT ID: NCT00118378 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Modafinil for Treating Fatigue in Adults With HIV/AIDS

Start date: December 2004
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study will determine whether modafinil (Provigil®), a medication approved for the treatment of narcolepsy, is effective in reducing fatigue in adults with HIV/AIDS.

NCT ID: NCT00117494 Completed - HIV Infections Clinical Trials

Rosuvastatin Versus Pravastatin in HIV Patients Treated With Boosted Protease Inhibitors (PI) (ANRS126)

Start date: October 2005
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

In HIV hypercholesterolemic patients treated with protease inhibitors, some drugs of the statin group are used to control cholesterol level. New and potentially more efficient statins may interfere with protease inhibitors and hence loose a part of their activity. They have thus to be compared with a more established drug of the same class (e.g. pravastatin). The protocol compares the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and pravastatin.