View clinical trials related to Healthy.
Filter by:The Lower Quadrant Y-Balance Test (LQYBT) is a landmark test used in assessing lower extremity performance, determining risk factors for injury, and making return-to-sport decisions. Studies have shown that the individual's focus of attention affects balance. The literature, has shown that the use of external focus is more effective than the use of internal focus in the execution of a movement.Consistent with these findings, the use of an external focus instruction during the LQYBT may lead to achieve more realistic and a higher performance outcome than the test result with standard instructions. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using different instructions and focusing techniques on test performance on the LQYBT. The secondary aim was to investigate the reliability of the different instructions and focus tests we used for the LQYBT. Hypothesis of the study that test performance can be further enhanced by differentiating the instructions and focus techniques. A more effective assessment of individual performance may help us to make a more realistic decision to return to sport.
The goal of this controlled, experimental study is to learn about the effects of 10 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on physical performance, vascular circulation, biochemical parameters, and composition of the intestinal microbiota in young healthy men depending on the frequency of single treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Do 10 treatments of hyperbaric oxygen therapy induce significant changes in physical performance levels, vascular circulation, and concentrations of biochemical parameters in young, healthy men? 2. Does the body's response to 10 treatments of hyperbaric oxygen therapy differ depending on the frequency of treatments? 3. Does a series of hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatments induce significant changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, metabolome, and functional status of the intestines? Participants are exposed to hyperoxia under hyperbaric conditions or form a control group with no treatment.
The incidence of type 2 diabetes worldwide has increased significantly over the past decades, which is associated with changing dietary habits and physical inactivity. According to the diet, so far there has been a great focus on the quality of carbohydrates and fat in relation to metabolic health, while the importance of protein has been neglected. The Danes' average protein intake is 1.5 g/kg/day, which is at the high end of the recommendations (0.8-1.5 g/kg/day) from the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR 2023). Recent studies in rodents have shown that protein restriction has positive effects on health, including improved glucose and insulin homeostasis and reduced fat mass, while a high intake of protein has a negative effect on insulin sensitivity. Previously the investigators have shown, in healthy young men, that consuming a diet low in protein (0.9 g/kg/day), compared to the participants usual diet (1.5 g/kg/day), over 7 days, resulted in an increased insulin sensitivity as well as a marked increase in the plasma fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) concentration. The increased insulin sensitivity is thought to be mediated by the increase in plasma FGF21 concentration. However, the effect is not yet fully understood. It is also not clear whether the increase in plasma FGF21 concentration, as well as the mentioned metabolic effects on insulin and glucose homeostasis, will take place if the participants are kept weight stable on a eucaloric diet.
This trial holds minimal risk to the trial volunteers and consists of obtaining whole blood via venipuncture to perform coagulation parameter measurements to define a Normal Reference Range. Written consent to participate in the study will be obtained prior to volunteer screening per site procedures.
The main purpose of this study is to compare two different formulations (mixtures) of pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) in healthy participants. This study will compare how much of each formulation gets into the blood stream and how long it takes the body to remove it. Information about any side effects that may occur will be collected. The study will last up to 65 days.
This is a randomized, open-label, prospective study to evaluate the nutritive effects of an a2 infant formula on growth and tolerance in healthy term infants. A total of 280 healthy, term, mixed-fed infants between 60 and 120 days of age were enrolled at Shanghai. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two study groups: the a2 infant formula group and the conventional A1/A2 infant formula group. Each group contained 140 infants. The study duration was 56 days.
The goal of this interventional study is to know the immune status of healthy participants and to obtain their biological age before and after two months of ingesting a dietary supplement. These individuals are compared with others who will be given a product of similar appearance, but without containing active components, being the constituents of the placebo group. The study has a duration of 8 weeks, with 2 interventional visits (complete blood samples will be collected) at baseline and at 8 weeks. In order to be included in the trial, the patient must read the Patient Information Sheet and sign the informed consent form. The dosage regimen is two capsules per day in a single dose.
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate 1) the dermatological tolerability of 2 facial sunscreens after 21 (+2) days of use under normal conditions on the half face by adult subjects with sensitive skin, 2) Compare the efficacy of investigational products (IPs) after 21 (+2) days of use in adult subjects with sensitive skin, under dermatological supervision through the following evaluations: the transepidermal water loss in the nasolabial region; the sensory perception of the subjects using the sensory perception questionnaire, after 21 (+2) days of use under normal conditions; the sensitivity of the subjects' skin after the first application of each product using a questionnaire on the perception of signs of discomfort.
This study is being performed to evaluate the effect of different active workstations (e.g., standing, stepping, or walking stations) on work performance through the evaluation of neurocognitive function using reasoning, memory, concentration, and fine motor skills evaluation tools.
Body scan meditation has been assumed to be an interoceptive intervention, and the evidence for its effects on interoceptive processes is unclear. Although this mindfulness based exercise typically involves focusing on some interoceptive signals such as breath, it also involves other bodily cues, such as somatosensory cues. The present study aimed to (1) investigate the feasibility of three online delivered mindfulness practices that differ in the signals targeted: visceral body scan (VBS), somatosensory body scan (SBS), and external (non body) meditation (ECM), and (2) gain insight into the potentially different effects of these interventions on interoceptive and other psychological outcomes in order to inform future full scale randomized controlled trials (RCT).