There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study is set up as a phase I-II prospective, single center, interventional pilot study carried in Office setting under local anesthesia. It will assess the impact in quality of life and adverse events produced by transperineal laser ablation of the prostate (TPLA) in men 40 to 85 years of age with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). BPH is currently managed with medications (ie, alpha-1 adrenergic medications) and/or invasive approaches such as transurethral resection of prostate or surgical excision of prostate - robotic or open lead to relaxation or excision of the bladder neck. Such alteration of the bladder neck function or anatomy portends a significant and noticeable change on a male lifestyle, represented by absence of antegrade ejaculation among others. This study aims to evaluate the use of TPLA in the office setting under local anesthesia - greatly decreasing patient perioperative surgical risk. Moreover, it aims to determine safety profile and outcomes from TPLA therapy The fundamental objective is to determine the feasibility and safety of TPLA in healthy men with LUTS due to BPH, successful performed in the outpatient office-based setting under local anesthesia. Secondary objectives include: 1-Uroflowmetry and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at three, six and 12 months; 2-Immediately spontaneous voiding post-TPLA; 3-Hematuria incidence after TPLA, measured by patient reporting; 4-LUTS after the treatment measured by IPSS; 5- Erectile function and presence of ejaculation after TPLA treatment and 6-Prostate volume changes using Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume measurements
The current proposal aims to test the feasibility of immune function analysis for Tai Chi Easy (TCE) intervention in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with concurrent exploration of health related quality of life (HRQOL).
Treatment of every child with anxiety disorder begins with the question of which treatment to start first. Both fluoxetine and CBT have strong empirical support, but few studies have compared their initial effectiveness head-to-head, and none has investigated what to do if the treatment tried first isn't working well-whether to optimize the treatment already begun or to add the other treatment. Aims of the study: 1. The study will assess whether beginning with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or fluoxetine medication is more effective in improving youth-rated anxiety symptoms over the 24-week intervention 2. If the initial intervention fails to induce clinical remission by week 12, the study will assess whether optimizing the initial treatment modality alone, or adding the other modality to the first, yields better symptom improvement by week 24 3. The study will assess whether one sequence of treatment modalities - i.e., CBT followed by optimized CBT; CBT followed by optimized CBT+ medication; medication followed by optimized medication; medication followed by optimized medication + CBT -- is significantly better or worse than predicted from the two main effects 4. The study will assess the stability of treatment response for ≥12 months following completion of the 24-week trial
This study design will test biological and behavioral mechanisms in the cross-sectional analyses and determine the prospective effects of circadian alignment and sleep on changes in cardiometabolic risk factors.
The main goal of this project is to identify the microbiome components change in abundance in response to food ingested including provided foods.
A 2-year phase 3, multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled, double-masked study. Primary efficacy will be determined at Week 52.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether combining nivolumab, FOLFOX, and regorafenib may be a safe and effective treatment for people who have HER2-negative metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Nivolumab is an antibody, like the proteins made by the immune system to protect the body from harm. Nivolumab blocks the protein PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor-1) that usually acts as a "brake" on the immune system. Blocking this protein is like releasing the brakes, so that the immune system can target cancer cells and destroy them. FOLFOX is a combination of three standard chemotherapy drugs (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) commonly used to treat your type of cancer. The drugs work by damaging the DNA in cancer cells, which can cause the cells to stop growing and die. Regorafenib is a type of drug called a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This drug targets the tyrosine kinase protein found in or on the surface of cancer cells that the cells need to survive and grow. Blocking this protein may stop cancer cells from growing, or cause them to grow more slowly or to shrink. The study researchers think that combining nivolumab, FOLFOX, and regorafenib may be a more effective treatment for HER2-negative metastatic esophagogastric cancer than the usual chemotherapy treatment(s) alone.
The purpose of this study is to assess the contraceptive efficacy of relugolix combination therapy.
The purpose of the ANT-006 study is to evaluate the bleeding profile of abelacimab relative to rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate-to-high risk of stroke.
This Phase 1/2 clinical study will evaluate evorpacept (ALX148) in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).