There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study evaluates the effect of iron chelation as a therapeutic strategy to slow the progression of Parkinson's disease. Half of participants will receive the deferiprone to 15 mg / kg twice daily morning and evening (30mg / kg per day), while the other half will receive a placebo. The treatment lasts nine months.
NOTE: The study data was transferred to zr pharma& following the divestment of Panobinostat to pharma&. Prior to study completion under the sponsorship of Secura Bio, the study was initiated and conducted in part under the sponsorship of Novartis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of three different regimens of PAN (20 mg TIW, 20 mg BIW, and 10 mg TIW) in combination with s.c. BTZ and Dex and to provide exposure, safety and efficacy data to identify the optimal regimen of PAN in a randomized, 3-arm parallel design. This study will also assess the impact of administering s.c. BTZ (in combination with PAN and Dex) twice weekly for 4 cycles, and then weekly starting from Cycle 5 until disease progression in patients ≤ 75 years of age. Patients > 75 years of age will receive for the entire treatment period s.c. BTZ weekly (in combination with PAN and Dex) until disease progression. Patients will be treated until disease progression or until they discontinue earlier due to unacceptable toxicity or for other reasons. Patients who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression will be followed for efficacy every 6 weeks. All patients will be followed for survival until the last patient entering long-term follow-up has completed a 3-year survival follow-up or discontinued earlier.
Watchman FLX Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device Post Approval Study
Mepolizumab is an anti-interleukin-5 ( IL-5) monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IL-5 and reduces eosinophil counts in both sputum and blood. Omalizumab an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe allergic asthma. The aim of this study is to investigate whether subjects not optimally controlled on their current omalizumab treatment, who are eligible for therapy with mepolizumab can be effectively and safely switched to treatment with mepolizumab to improve asthma control. The study will provide data on the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability of mepolizumab when switched directly from omalizumab without any wash-out. The learnings from this study may help guide physicians when substituting one biologic with another for the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The study will be a multi-centre, open-label single arm trial. Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who are receiving omalizumab, but are not optimally controlled will be eligible to participate. Subjects will remain on their current maintenance therapy including omalizumab throughout the run-in period for a minimum of one week and up to 4 weeks. At Visit 2 (week 0) subjects will discontinue their omalizumab treatment and be switched to mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks for 28 weeks. The treatment period is 32 weeks, including an Exit Visit/Early Withdrawal Visit, 4 weeks following the subject's last dose of mepolizumab.
The purpose of this study is to determine if adding Elotuzumab to Pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone is a more effective treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone by itself.
Rationale: Application of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) has recently been shown to improve survival and quality of life when applied with sufficiently high inspiratory pressures and adequate backup breathing frequencies (so called high-intensity NIV). However, for a broader implementation of this therapy in a potentially large group of patients, important issues have to be solved. First, the initiation of high-intensity NIV, currently performed in the hospital, is often time-consuming, expensive and inconvenient for patients. Secondly, although clinicians recognise that not all patients benefit, it is not known which factors predict a positive response. Objectives: 1. To investigate whether home initiation of chronic NIV in stable COPD patients with CHRF is non-inferior to inpatient initiation. 2. To investigate predictors of a favourable response to chronic NIV in COPD patients with CHRF. Study design: The study is 1:1 two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial comparing the usual inpatient NIV initiation to home initiation. Study population: Seventy-two COPD patients with a NIV indication (COPD GOLD stage III or IV; partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) > 6.0 kPa in stable condition, i.e. no COPD exacerbation for 4 weeks and a pH > 7.35), a sufficient social network at home, without severe cardiac comorbidities, will be included. Intervention: Home initiation of NIV will be compared with standard in-hospital initiation. NIV at home will be titrated by a specialised nurse of our home mechanical ventilation centre (HMV) on transcutaneously measured gas exchange and respiratory electromyography and will be adjusted with the use of telemedicine. Main study parameters/endpoints: 1. To investigate non-inferiority of home initiation, the change in arterial carbon dioxide pressure after 3 months treatment will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are safety, change in lung function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs. 2. To investigate predictors of a favourable response, patient demographics, and baseline data on lung function as well as measures of respiratory muscle activity, arterial blood gases, comorbidities, inflammatory blood markers and anxiety and depressions scores will be collected of all patients.
This is a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational single arm study. Two-hundred patients will be recruited in the Netherlands over a one year period. In all cases, the decision to treat the patient with apremilast will be made prior to the decision to enter the subject into this study. Treatment will be according to routine clinical practice and based on recommendations as per the SPC of apremilast (Otezla®). Recruitment will continue until 200 patients have entered the study. Each patient will be followed for 12 months.
This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg administered every 14 days in subjects with grade 1 or 2, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic or intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) once they have progressed on the standard dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days.
There is no consensus about the best treatment for patients with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures (AO type C fractures). Despite this lack of consensus and the lack of available literature on comparative data to guide treatment for this patient population, operative treatment with plate fixation has gained popularity. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome of open reduction and plate fixation with closed reduction and plaster immobilisation in adult patients (18-75 years) with displaced complete articular distal radius fractures.
The purpose of this study is to visualize and quantify ER-binding sites during treatment with Elacestrant (RAD1901)