View clinical trials related to Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Filter by:This is a multicenter, single-arm,Phase II clinical trial to explore the efficacy and safety of Eribulin combined with Sintilimab in the first-line treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer.
The purpose of this research study is to see if the medication sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is effective at the currently approved dose and schedule in people who have previously received trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for the treatment of metastatic, hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 low (HER2 low) breast cancer. Although SG is approved to treat metastatic HR+/HER2 negative breast cancer, the aim of this study is to determine if SG is still effective specifically in people who have already received T-DXd.
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1a/1b clinical study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of BGB-43395, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) inhibitor, as monotherapy or in combination with fulvestrant, letrozole, or other combination partners in Chinese participants with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) and other advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and will receive pembrolizumab in combination with cryoablation OR pembrolizumab alone. Participants will be randomly assigned.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of talectrectinib as treatment for Stage IV ILC with CDH1 mutation
This is a phase Ib/II exploratory study. Phase Ib includes the dose escalation and expansion study of monotherapy, as well as the dose escalation study of combination therapy. After determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), a dose expansion study is conducted to observe the safety and efficacy in monotherapy. Phase II study is to further observe the safety and efficacy of TQB2930 combined with albumin-paclitaxel (cohort 3), or chemotherapy selected by investigators (cohort 4).
The purpose of this study is to test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in those with malignant brain cancer diagnoses.
This study is looking at whether patients with cancer that has aggressively spread to the spine can be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy only and avoid a large spine surgery
Background: Emerging evidence indicates that patients with advanced cancer, such as those with MBC, often exhibit significant levels of nonadherence to oral anticancer treatments. Leveraging of the machine learning models in clinical practice enables the provision of personalized predictions on medication adherence for individual patients, thereby supporting adherence and facilitating targeted interventions. Objective: The current protocol aims to assess the efficacy of the DSS, a web-based solution named TREAT (TREatment Adherence SupporT), and a machine learning web application in promoting adherence to oral anticancer treatments within a sample of MBC patients. Methods and Design: This protocol is part of a project titled "Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients" (Tracking Number 65080791). A sample of 100 MBC patients is enrolled consecutively and admitted to the Division of Medical Senology of the European Institute of Oncology. 50 MBC patients receive the DSS for three months (experimental group), while 50 MBC patients not subjected to the intervention receive standard medical advice (control group). The protocol foresees three assessment time points: T1 (1-Month), T2 (2-Month), and T3 (3-Month). At each time point, participants fill out a set of self-reports evaluating adherence, clinical, psychological, and QoL variables. Conclusions: our results will inform about the effectiveness of the DSS and risk-predictive models in fostering adherence to oral anticancer treatments in MBC patients.
At a median follow-up of 33 months, the combination of anastrozole and NOLVADEX (tamoxifen citrate) did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit when compared to NOLVADEX (tamoxifen citrate) therapy given alone in all patients as well as in the hormone receptor positive subpopulation. This treatment arm was discontinued from the trial. This study is now a combination therapy whereas the median duration of adjuvant treatment for safety evaluation is 59.8 months and 59.6 months for patients receiving anastrozole 1 mg and NOLVADEX (tamoxifen citrate) 20 mg, respectively.