There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The instillation of local anesthetic into the peritoneum has been found to be safe and effective in reducing postoperative pain and morphine consumption after abdominal surgery. A review of studies reporting serum levels of local anesthetic after intraperitoneal delivery found no cases of clinical toxicity in any of the trials. The studies in this meta-analysis did not include post-cesarean delivery pain and there is a lack of data to support the use of intraperitoneal local anesthetic after cesarean section. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intraperitoneal lidocaine on postoperative pain scores after cesarean delivery. This study will compare a 20ml solution of lidocaine (400mg) with epinephrine 5mcg/ml versus normal saline (placebo) instilled into the peritoneum at the end of surgery in women undergoing cesarean delivery. The investigators hypothesize that intraperitoneal lidocaine will result in lower pain scores, reduce opioid consumption and opioid related side effects, and higher maternal satisfaction after cesarean delivery.
PostPartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal death worldwide. Oxytocin is the most commonly used uterotonic drug to prevent and treat PPH in North America. However oxytocin has a very short duration of action, requiring a continuous infusion to achieve sustained uterotonic activity. Moreover large doses are associated with adverse effects like hypotension, nausea, vomiting, dysrhythmias and ST changes. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) has recommended a single dose of 100 mcg of carbetocin at elective cesarean delivery to promote uterine contraction. In three studies recently performed at Mount Sinai Hospital, the investigators have found no difference in uterine contractility between the doses of 20- 120 mcg carbetocin and that the ED90 is 14.8 mcg. Thus a larger trial comparing the minimum effective dose determined in the previous three trials with the standard 100 mcg dose is necessary to confirm these findings.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether an antimicrobial stewardship program can decrease the length of hospital stay for patients with pneumonia. The antimicrobial stewardship program is run by a pharmacist and doctor with extensive training in managing infectious diseases. These two health care professionals are responsible for reviewing the records of patients admitted to hospital with pneumonia, and then making specific recommendations to the patient's attending physician about how to manage antibiotic treatment. These recommendations might include discontinuing the antibiotic, or changing the way antibiotics are delivered from intravenous form to pill form, among many other potential options. The attending physician considers whether these recommendations should be followed or rejected. The study has a control group of patients who are not reviewed by the antimicrobial stewardship team, and their length of hospital stay will be compared to the reviewed group of patients. Any differences between these two groups will be assumed to be due to the impact of the antimicrobial stewardship program. So far, no previous study has been able to demonstrate that an antimicrobial stewardship program can reduce the length of stay of patients admitted to hospital with pneumonia. This study has some important differences from previous studies that may make its conclusions more accurately reflect the true impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The most important difference is how the timing of the review is modelled in the analysis of the study results. Because the timing of the review varies between patients, with some patients being reviewed at earlier and some at later times, this subtle difference, if not accounted for in the analysis, can mask a true positive effect of the program on length of stay. The investigators study will account for this variation.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab compared to chlorambucil in combination with obinutuzumab based on the Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment of progression free survival (PFS). Efficacy will be evaluated according to 2008 International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) criteria with the modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis, in subjects with treatment-naive CLL or SLL.
- evaluate the safety and toxicity profile of renal radio-ablation in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. - to assess renal function post radio-ablation - Primary and metastatic tumour response to radio-ablation
Patients in London and Hamilton with severe asthma who are deemed eligible by a respirologist to undergo bronchial thermoplasty treatment will be randomized to image-guided or conventional bronchial thermoplasty using hyperpolarized noble gas imaging.
The Investigators are conducting a research study to learn about the safety and benefit of using a medication called buprenorphine for patient with difficult to treat depression . This research study is testing whether combining two medications will be effective in treating depression when initial treatment with just one antidepressant does not relieve the depressive symptoms ; this is what is called " difficult to treat depression " or " treatment resistant depression ". The two medication the investigators are using are " an anti-depressant medication called venlafaxine XR ( the generic form of Effexor ) and buprenorphine . Buprenorphine is a medication that is FDA approved for the treatment of opioid dependence. The investigators are testing whether adding buprenorphine to venlafaxine enhances treatment response.
The objective of this pilot study is to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Fluzone High Dose with Fluzone (standard adult dose) influenza vaccines in healthcare workers.
This study will recruit 35 healthcare workers who had systemic reactions to influenza vaccine the last 2 times they were vaccinated, to ask whether influenza vaccine is indeed associated with systemic reactions in these workers.
Many patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require hospitalization and/or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission because of acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure or for any acute deterioration of clinical status. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the first option for the clinical management of CF patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress and NIV has been shown to improve gas exchange, reduce respiratory muscle work and improve pulmonary function in patients with obstructive lung disease in general and those with acute CF exacerbation. High-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFN) is a relatively new system providing heated and humidified, high-flow (50L/min) oxygen through the nostrils. This device provides a small positive pressure, probably washes-out the pharyngeal dead space, reduces inspiratory resistance, and possibly facilitates secretion clearance. The technique is very well tolerated. From a physiologic standpoint, this device could help CF patients by improving gas exchange, reducing respiratory workload, and facilitating mucus clearance. Non-interrupted delivery may be possible given better clinical tolerance in contrast with bi-level positive pressure NIV. Whether the short-term physiological efficacy of HFN is comparable to NIV is unknown and there is no study on the benefit of HFN in CF patients. The aim of this study is to compare the physiological effects of HFN and NIV in CF patients requiring ventilatory support. Our hypothesis is that HFN will not be inferior to NIV, as evaluated by breathing pattern, gas exchange, and respiratory workload and will decrease dead space. In addition, comfort and preference between the two techniques will be evaluated.