There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Antibiotic overuse is common and antibiotic prescribing contributes to rising rates of antimicrobial resistance. Primary care physicians prescribe the majority of all antibiotics and there is large inter-physician variability in prescribing that cannot be explained by differences in patient populations. Peer comparison audit and feedback (A&F) can act as an effective behavioural intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. The range of effects seen in prior A&F trials could be attributed, at least in part, to differences in the way the feedback interventions were designed. In fall 2018, the investigators conducted an audit and feedback trial of mailed letters to 3500 family physicians in Ontario who prescribe the highest volume of antibiotics [NCT03776383]. While effective, family physicians questioned the credibility of the report in terms of its ability to fairly account for their practice size and population. In Ontario, A&F is routinely offered to primary care providers from a variety of sources. Ontario Health - an agency created by the Government of Ontario - provides A&F via email to physicians who voluntarily sign up for their "MyPractice" reports. These are multi-topic reports with aggregated (physician-level) data. As of November 2021, the MyPractice reports for family physicians will include data on antibiotic prescribing. To date, less than half of Ontario family physicians have signed up for the MyPractice reports from Ontario Health. For this study, the investigators will conduct a trial to investigate the effect of A&F in family physicians not already receiving A&F through a MyPractice: Primary Care report. Physicians who do not already receive antibiotic prescribing feedback through a MyPractice report will receive personalized antibiotic prescribing feedback through a letter mailed out from PHO. This large-scale evaluation provides an opportunity to evaluate not only whether A&F using such data is helpful in the post-covid context, but how best to design the A&F intervention and to explore why we observed (or not) changes in antibiotic prescribing.
Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in Canada and has the eighth highest cancer mortality rate. The treatment for the most frequent type of bladder cancer is surgically removing the tumour followed by six weeks of medication placed within the bladder. There are physical and psychosocial challenges from bladder cancer and its treatment that may affect how patients feel and function, and consequently their quality of life. Moreover, bladder cancer patients are at a high risk of their bladder cancer coming back and getting worse. Exercise is a low-cost intervention that may lower the chances of bladder cancer coming back or getting worse, manage side effects related to treatment, help patients feel better, and improve quality of life. To date, however, no study has examined if it is safe or even possible for bladder cancer patients to exercise when they are receiving drugs placed into their bladder. The Bladder cancer and exeRcise trAining during intraVesical thErapy (BRAVE) Trial will be the first study to test the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of exercise in bladder cancer patients during this drug therapy. The investigators will ask some patients to do a supervised exercise program during their drug treatment while other patients will be asked not to exercise. The investigators will compare the 2 groups on how they fare with their bladder cancer treatment. This study will provide information on whether exercise may help patients feel better, function better, and possibly even lower their chances of the disease coming back or getting worse.
Social isolation is defined as the objective and/or subjective reduction of number and quality of interpersonal contacts leading to a loss of an individual's social role and stigmatization. It is a major problem in Canadian society with a high prevalence in the older population (30% in individuals aged 65 and over, representing 1.5 million individuals). Social isolation is associated with a wide range of mental and physical health problems that leads to an increase in the use of health and social services. This issue increased with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic which attacking your society at its core. Social distancing and in particular home confinement exacerbated social isolation of frailer groups like the elderly people. In 2016, the International Federation on Ageing reported that "the main new problem facing seniors in Canada is maintaining their social contacts and activities". This highlights the need for efficient and effective interventions to improve the social inclusion of older adults experiencing social isolation. Research suggests that art-based activities carried out at museums have significant benefits for older adults experiencing social isolation, and may foster social inclusion, well-being, quality of life and mitigate frailty. Yet few studies have examined empirically the effects of museum art-based activities in older adults experiencing social isolation. In 2019, the principal investigator of this research conducted an experimental pilot study based on a pre-post intervention (i.e., 3-month cycle of weekly guided tours carried out at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA)), single arm, prospective and longitudinal follow-up named "Effects of Montreal Museum of Fine Arts visits and older community dwellers with a precarious state: An experimental study", which indicated the potential of museum tours to improve social inclusion, well-being, the quality of life and frailty in older community members experiencing social isolation. However, these studies were performed before the COVID-19 crisis and were in-site activities. The principal investigator hypothesizes that a 3-month cycle of virtual weekly MMFA tours may induce changes in well-being, quality of life and health condition in older community dwellers participating like the 'Beautiful Thursday' cycle, and that this activity can prevent the worsening of vulnerability and social isolation due to social distancing.
Increasing physical activity is critical for children's overall health. Smartphone apps using gamification has shown promise to increasing physical activity using game techniques. This study is a 4-week randomized controlled trial using a gamified smartphone app to determine acceptability and preliminary effectiveness to increase physical activity in children.
The current state of knowledge reveals that the development of the brain of preterm infants is influenced by specific neonatal experiences during hospitalization, such as environmental sensory stimulation (light and noise), as well as physical and emotional proximity to mothers. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits that could be associated with the combination of care interventions to improve the health outcomes of preterm infants and their mothers, and in particular the development of the brain of infants during their hospitalization in the neonatal unit. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a developmental care intervention including periods of nurturing between mothers and their infant (skin-to-skin contact and auditory stimulation) to promote physical and emotional proximity and a quiet period (controlled light and noise levels and olfactory stimulation in incubators) and to estimate the effect of this intervention on infants' neurodevelopment as well as on maternal stress and anxiety.
This is a Global Study of Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant Durvalumab or Placebo and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab or Placebo in Patients with Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Cancer (GC/GEJC) (MATTERHORN).
A phase 2 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AL002 in participants with Early Alzheimer's Disease.
One-third of Canadians will be older adults (>65y) by 2050. Thus, healthy aging is a public health priority. Many older adult health promoting interventions have been implemented, yet few were scaled-up and sustained. Choose to Move (CTM) is an effective, adaptable, community-based health promotion program for older adults. CTM, co-created with government and community stakeholders, has been scaled-up across British Columbia (BC) using a phased approach (2015-2021). The investigators evaluated the impact of CTM on the health of seniors who participated and the results were extremely positive: CTM increased mobility, physical activity, social connectedness and improved mental health indicators like loneliness. When these outcomes were assessed again, one year after the end of CTM, these improvements had diminished. In this trial the investigators aim to determine if health benefits of CTM can be maintained by providing ongoing support to CTM participants. Booster interventions have been defined as "brief contacts beyond the main part of the intervention to reinforce previous intervention content" (Fjeldsoe et al., 2011, p. 601). Choose to Move - Next Steps (CTM-NS) is a two-year intervention where participants who recently completed CTM will receive different doses of a 'booster' program. Specifically, participants will be randomly allocated to virtual group meetings on a monthly (study arm 1; high dose) or quarterly (study arm 2; low dose) basis. Group meetings will be facilitated by an Activity Coach. Objectives: The investigators will conduct 1) impact, 2) implementation, and 3) economic evaluations of CTM-NS across 24 months. Hypotheses: For objective 1, the investigators hypothesize that improvements in older adult participant outcomes (primary outcome: mobility; secondary outcomes: physical activity, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, sitting time, screen time, social network, health status) obtained during CTM will be maintained over the 2 year CTM-NS study. Participants in the monthly group meetings (study arm 1) will maintain benefits to a greater degree than participants in the quarterly group meetings (study arm 2). Objectives 2 and 3 are descriptive and therefore have no hypotheses.
The aim of this study is to appreciate, using quantitative and qualitative empirical methods, the contribution of an educational video game to the engagement, the motivation, and the development of nursing students' interpretation of acute heart failure patients' health condition. Two prototypes of the same educational video game have been developed. Study participants will play with both prototypes, complete online questionnaires and be interviewed by a research assistant regarding their experience with both prototypes. Study results will serve to select the most promising prototype between the two, based on its potential to support the engagement, the motivation, and the development of nursing students' interpretation of acute heart failure patients' health condition. Study results will also serve to refine the selected prototype before conducting a larger-scale efficacy trial. As such and given the small sample number of participants that is expected, it is not planned to conduct hypothesis testing.
This is an observational study planned to document prospectively disease manifestation and neurocognitive course in pediatric patients with a clinical presentation consistent with neuronopathic ("severe") MPS II undergoing current standard of care and/or intrathecal Elaprase® for their condition. Some patients may be offered the opportunity to screen for a gene therapy study conducted by the same sponsor.