Neurological Complications Comparing Endoscopically vs. Open Harvest of the Radial Artery

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial

— NEO  

Official title:

Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvest and Mammario-radial Versus Aorto-radial Grafting in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (The 2x2 Factorial Designed Randomised NEO Trial)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01848886
• Other study ID #: H-3-2012-116
• Secondary ID: H-3-2012-116
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 2013
• Est. completion date: November 2020

Study information

• Verified date: March 2021
• Source: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the radial artery (RA) has since the nineties gone through a revival. The initially reported worse outcome in RA graft patients compared to patients grafted with the saphenous vein (SV) has since been corrected. Studies have shown better patency when using RA, so the RA is going to be preferred more and more especially in younger patients where long time patency is critical. During the last 10 years endoscopic techniques to harvest the RA have evolved. Multiple different techniques have been used, but now the equipment and technique have been refined and are highly reliable. The investigators hypothesize that the endoscopic technique has less complications and a just as good patency as open harvest. There are also two possible ways to use the RA as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another way is sewing it onto the mammarian artery. The investigators hypothesize that using it on the mammarian artery is superior as a revascularisation technique with just as good a patency as sewing it directly onto the aorta.

Description:

Objectives The present trial will in patients undergoing CABG (1) evaluate the complications in endoscopic versus traditionally harvested radial arteries, (2) evaluate graft patency in endoscopic harvested radial arteries versus open technique, and (3) evaluate the use of mammario-radial grafting versus aorto-radial grafting. Design and trial size The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2x2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endovascular group; (2) aorto-radial endovascular group; (3) mammario-radial open group and (4) aorto-radial open group. A subgroup of 100 participants will be selected to undergo a special scanning of the vascular perfusion of donor and control hands (MIBI scan). The evaluation of graft patency and ischaemia in the arm will be blinded but the assessment of the primary outcome of handfunction at three months is non-blinded evaluated by questionnaire. Trial interventions Trial 1: The experimental procedure in this trial will be endoscopic radial artery harvest (ERAH). The control intervention will be open radial artery harvest (ORAH). Trial 2: The experimental procedure in this trial will be the technique where the radial artery is sewn onto the mammarian artery as a mammario-radial anastomosis (composite/Y-graft). The control intervention will be the technique of sewing the radial artery directly onto the aorta as an aorto-radial anastomosis (free radial artery). Inclusion and exclusion criteria All patients referred to our department for sub acute or elective coronary bypass operation will be eligible for trial inclusion. Inclusion criteria are: 18 years or older; able and willing to give informed consent; multi-vessel disease. Exclusion criteria are: off-pump procedure; multi-procedure (i.e. concomitant valve surgery); contrast allergy; geographically not available for follow-up; Allen's test with insufficient ulnary artery perfusion; no informed consent; acute operation; dialysis; preoperative neurological deficit on the donor arm; left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 20%; former sternotomy and malignant disease. Primary and secondary outcomes Trial 1: The primary outcome will be evaluation of hand function at three months. The secondary outcomes will be: occurrence of neurophysiological defects in the donor arm assessed by examination of cutaneous sensibility and measurements of the sensory and motoric nervous conduction velocity preoperatively and after three months; change in subjective cutaneous sensibility assessed by a clinical examination after three months; complications assessed as a composite of haematoma formation, wound dehiscence or infection registered before discharge and after three months. We will also assess a number of exploratory outcomes (serious adverse events, reoperation for bleeding, revascularisation, myocardial infarction, stroke or death, handgrip strength, muscular function in the hand, scar evaluation, vascular supply to the hand, graft patency and participants subjective evaluation of hand function after 1 year). Trial 2: The primary outcome will be the occurrence of cardio- or cerebrovascular events during the first year after surgery comparing mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafts. As an exploratory outcome we will also assess graft patency by multi-slice computer tomography (MSCT) comparing mammarioradial versus aortoradial grafts one year after surgery. Time schedule Randomisation will commence after 15th of May 2013. The inclusion period of altogether 300 participants is expected to last three years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 301
• Est. completion date: November 2020
• Est. primary completion date: October 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

• Elective/sub acute CABG as an isolated procedure.
• Age > 18 years
• Multi-vessel disease
• Non-dominant arm is eligible for radial artery harvest
• Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria
• Geographically not available for follow up
• Modified Allen's test indicating insufficient ulnary artery perfusion
• Valve surgery, ablation surgery or any kind of concomitant surgery during same admission.
• Acute operation (<24 hours from admission)
• Dialysis
• Preoperative neurological deficit on the donor arm
• LVEF < 20% preoperative
• Former sternotomy
• Contrast allergy
• Malignant disease
• No written informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Arterial Occlusive Diseases
• Arteriosclerosis
• Cardiovascular Diseases
• Complications Due to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Heart Diseases
• Ischemia
• Myocardial Ischemia
• Vascular Diseases

Intervention

Procedure:
• Endoscopic radial artery harvest
Radial artery harvest is performed as an endoscopic procedure.
• Open radial artery harvest
Radial artery harvest is performed as an open procedure.
• Mammarioradial graft (Y-graft)
The radial artery is used as an composite graft positioned on the internal mammarian artery.
• Aortoradial graft (Free RA)
The radial artery is used as an free graft positioned on the aorta.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Rigshospitalet	Copenhagen

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Vascular function in the donor arm of the ERAH and ORAH groups compared to non-donor arms.	MIBI scan after exercise induced relative ischemia will be compared between donor versus non-donor arms.	3 months postoperatively
Other	Graft patency in ERAH versus ORAH	MSCT will be used to evaluate patency.	1 year postoperatively
Other	Graft patency in aortoradial versus mammarioradial grafting	MSCT will be used to evaluate patency.	1 year postoperatively
Other	Change in handgrip strength	Change in handgrip strength will be measured in the conduit donor arm and compared between ERAH versus ORAH.	the day before surgery and 1 year postoperatively.
Other	Change in muscular function in ERAH versus ORAH	Following muscles are rated according to the Oxford Scale for grading muscle strength (see table 7) the day before surgery and at one year postoperatively: m. abductor pollicis brevis; m. abductor digiti minimi; mm. interosseus palmares; m. flexor digitorum profundus II+V; m. extensor digitorum The change in muscular function will be compared between ERAH versus ORAH.	the day before surgery and 1 year postoperatively
Other	Serious adverse events in ERAH versus ORAH	Occurrence of the following serious adverse events at time point one year after surgery: reoperation for bleeding; revascularisation; myocardial infarction; stroke; or death will be compared between ERAH and ORAH.	1 year postoperatively
Other	Scar evaluation in ERAH versus ORAH	Using Stony Brooke Scar Evaluation Score the scars will be evaluated and the mean scores compared between ERAH versus ORAH groups.	1 year postoperatively
Other	Neuropathic pain symptoms and signs in ERAH versus ORAH	The Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANNS) pain scale will be used after 3 months to compare pain in ERAH versus ORAH groups.	3 months postoperatively
Primary	Sum score of hand function questionnaire	Using Likert-type scale scoring system quality of life is assessed after radial artery harvest. The mean values in the ERAH group will be compared to the mean value in the ORAH group at three months after surgery.	3 months postoperatively
Primary	Occurence of cardiac and cerebrovascular events in aortoradial versus mammarioradial grafting	Occurrence of one of the following cardiac or cerebrovascular events: all cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation (TVR) or stroke at one year postoperatively will be compared.	1 year postoperatively
Secondary	Complications in the donor arm in ERAH versus ORAH	Occurrence of complications at three months after surgery. Complications are defined as a composite of haematoma formation, wound dehiscence, or infection will be compared.	3 months postoperatively
Secondary	Clinical neurological examination in donor arm ERAH versus ORAH	Clinical examination of subjective cutaneous sensibility will be compared between ERAH versus ORAH groups.	3 months postoperatively
Secondary	Neurological deficits in ERAH versus ORAH	Occurence of deficits in following neurological exams will be compared between ERAH and ORAH; Cutaneous sensibility on both forearms and hands by appraisal of dermatomes. All sensibility modalities are examined: Cutaneous touch sensibility examined by Von Fray hair; Deep pain sensibility examined by algometry.; Sensory nervous conduction velocity examined on both forearms and hands: N. medianus (dig. II - hdl); orthodromic technique; N. ulnaris (dig. V - hdl); orthodromic technique; N. radialis (antebrachium - tabatiere); antidromic technique; N. cutaneous antebrachium lateralis (elbow - antebrachium); antidromic technique; N. cutaneous antebrachium medialis (elbow - antebrachium); antidromic technique; Motoric nervous conduction velocity examined on both forearms and hands: N. medianus (hdl - m. abductor policis brevis (APB), elbow - APB); N. ulnaris (hdl - m. abductor digiti minimi)	3 months postoperatively