View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of a nature-based cognitive intervention to restore cognitive function among women treated for breast cancer.
Identifying women at risk for hereditary cancer potentiates prevention, early detection or personalised treatment against cancer. We using mobile mammography units will provide genetic sceening and testing services to underserved women coming for thier mammograms to these units.
This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, global study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inavolisib plus fulvestrant compared with alpelisib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative, PIK3CA-mutated, locally advanced (LA) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), who progressed during or after cyclin dependent kinase 4/6i (CDK4/6i)-based therapy.
People with advanced chronic cancers are now living for many years as a result of new targeted anti-cancer treatments. Many of these treatments are quite new and people may take them for months, even years, as long as the treatments are helping. The purpose of this study is to help understand how to best support people receiving these treatments.
To evaluate the impact of an adapted online, self-help relationship intervention (supplemented with brief coach calls) for survivors of breast cancer and their partners. Couples will be randomized to receive either the online intervention (Together after Cancer) or usual care (UC) and assessed at baseline, end of the program, and 3 months after randomization.
This study will assess if the presence of immune system cells in and around the tumor impacts tumor shrinkage in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.
The Mind programme for cancer patients was developed by this project PI through the integration of ACT, mindfulness and CFT components specifically adapted to the needs of a cancer population. This intervention aims at improving well-being, preventing subsequent distress, and promoting adaptation to the disease and posttreatment period. A recent pilot study presented preliminary findings on this intervention, suggesting high acceptability and efficacy in improving self-reported psychological health in breast cancer patients undergoing Radiotherapy treatment. Nevertheless, this study's small sample size, methodology (inactive control group), and exclusive reliance on self-reported data limit the interpretation and generalization of results, creating an avenue for the optimization and further testing of the programme through more robust and reliable methods. The aim of this project is therefore to optimize the Mind programme taking into consideration the results from its pilot study and to conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial on the efficacy of the intervention in improving not only mental health outcomes but also biological markers, as well as on its cost-effectiveness, in women with breast cancer. The superiority of the Mind programme will be compared to a support group intervention through the analysis of changes in cancer-specific quality of life, depressive symptoms and anxiety severity, psychological experiences, and immunological and epigenetics markers related to mental health and breast cancer prognosis. All participants will receive the intervention that shows better results.
This is an investigator-initiated randomized controlled, open-label, multicenter, prospective Phase 2 clinical study. Patients with stage II-III HR +/HER2 + breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. The experimental group received pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab, dalpiciclib and letrozole; the control group received trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, docetaxel and carboplatin. The main study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HR +/HER2 + breast cancer in the two groups.
In recent years, the incidence rate of breast cancer has remained high. In China, breast cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence rate among women. Although the research and development of various targeted drugs and the improvement of clinical treatment system have effectively improved the 5-year survival rate of breast cancer patients in China, the clinical treatment effect of breast cancer is still unsatisfactory. It is speculated that the main reasons for the poor clinical efficacy of breast cancer are drug tolerance, recurrence, distant metastasis, etc., which further leads to some limitations in the exploration of clinical drug development and regulatory mechanism. Paclitaxels are common chemotherapeutic drugs, which have been widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and some lung cancer. In2005, albumin binding paclitaxel was approved by FDA for the treatment of breast cancer patients. It is highly hydrophobic and requires a mixture of polyethylene castor oil and ethanol. These solvents will increase the toxic reactions of patients treated with paclitaxel, including severe allergic and anaphylactic reactions, and irreversible peripheral neuropathy, usually requiring the use of corticosteroids and antihistamines in advance.In order to further confirm the advantages of albumin binding paclitaxel and common paclitaxel chemotherapeutic drugs in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer, this project intends to explore albumin binding based on different molecular types of breast cancer (luminal a, B, HER2 +, triple negative) An observational study on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a-paclitaxel and common paclitaxel chemotherapeutic drugs. Randomized grouping confirmed the effectiveness of albumin binding paclitaxel replacing common paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer with different molecular types, providing evidence-based medical evidence for the selection of paclitaxel chemotherapeutic drugs based on breast cancer molecular types. At the same time, the patients with poor efficacy among the patients who selected the neoadjuvant chemotherapy scheme for breast cancer according to the guidelines of NCCN and CSCO were screened for clinical transformation research (including basic experimental research, follow-up intensive treatment selection, and providing basis for entering other drug clinical trials). For the patients who achieved the clinical efficacy of PCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we further analyzed the reasons to explore a better scheme of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
T-REX is a randomized multicenter, non-inferiority trial. Aim: To evaluate whether regional radiotherapy may safely be omitted in clinically node negative breast cancer patients with one or two sentinel node macrometastases and an estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative tumor. Leading to an improved quality of life and reduced side effects, without worsening recurrence free survival at five years. Intervention: Patients will be randomized to locoregional radiotherapy towards the breast/chestwall and regional lymph nodes vs. to a de-escalated radiotherapy. In the intervention arm no lymph node irradiation will be given. Radiotherapy is still given to the remaining breast after breast conserving surgery, but no radiotherapy is given after mastectomy. Sample size: 1350 patients Primary end-point: Recurrence free survival at five years. Gene expression analysis: For all patients gene expression analysis for the gene signatures ARTIC, POLAR and OncotypeDX will be performed in collaboration with Exact Sciences, and related to risk of recurrence and benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy.