View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:To find out if contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to determine if patients receiving combined ICI therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are responding to treatment earlier than standard of care MR or CT.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test a new PET tracer in patients with HER2-positive breast or gastric cancer. This tracer is made of radioactively labeled trastuzumab, and can show where HER2 is present in the body using a PET-scan. For this research, the investigators make PET-scans in people with HER2-positive, metastasized breast- or gastric cancer. The investigators will investigate if the new HER2-tracer correctly shows all tumor lesions. In the future, this method may be useful to help predict who will benefit from certain HER2-directed therapies. Participants will be injected with the radioactive tracer once. After injection, participants will undergo 3 PET-scans. Each PET-scan will take a maximum of 60 minutes. The PET-scans are on separate days within a week after injection of the tracer (e.g. 1 day, 2 days and 4 days after injection). Furthermore, the investigators will take 7 blood samples (5 mL each). Participants are not required to stay at the hospital. The first 3 participants will undergo an extra PET-scan 1 - 2 hours after injection. The amount of radioactivity injected will be 37 MBq (± 10%).
This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm within the study will be 7 years.
Breast surgery may be overtreatment when there is a complete response to systemic neoadjuvant treatment as determined clinically and by imaging. However the reliability of imaging techniques (ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance) in identifying complete response varies in published studies and surgery remains the preferred method of detecting residual disease. The aims of this study are: 1. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in identifying residual breast in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease <1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. 2. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided needle biopsy in identifying residual axillary disease in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease <1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. After neoadjuvant treatment, and evaluation with ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance, VAB will be performed on the breast, and needle biopsy will be performed on the axillary lymph node of pre-treatment cN1 cases, previously marked with a magnetic clip. The biopsy findings will be compared with the surgical findings, consisting in quadrantectomy or mastectomy plus sentinel node biopsy (or separate removal of tagged lymph nodes if they do not coincide with the sentinel node(s)) to assess the ability of biopsy to identify residual disease.
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 (who are both hormone receptor [HR]-negative and HR-positive) unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) treatments usually include a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. These life-saving treatments cause high percentages of arm morbidity, which often lasts for months, or develops months after surgery. Arm and shoulder morbidity includes prolonged pain, restriction of movement, limitation of function and lymphedema (chronic progressive edema). All of these morbidities affect the quality of life (QOL) of the recovering patients and require lengthy care. Early detection of patients at risk and provision of proactive treatment can improve the recovery process from surgery and oncology treatments. Aim: To develop a screening tool for the early identification of women at high risk for prolonged arm morbidity following BC treatments (persistent pain, lymphedema, function deficits and decreased range of motion), validate the tool, and examine the efficiency of intervention based on the the use of the tool.
This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II study to explore the efficacy and safety of Everolimus in combination with standard first-line endocrine therapy for the HR+/ HER2-SNF1 subtype of advanced breast cancer. The study was used to explore the efficacy of Everolimus in combination with standard endocrine therapy.
This study is a post-marketing, observational, multicenter, prospective study. It will investigate the the safety and effectiveness of T-DM1 in the Chinese population in real-world clinical practice.
Several localization techniques are now in use for localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Several studies have compared wire guided localization (WGL), which has been for years the gold standard for non-palpable breast lesions' localization, with more modern techniques. Scientific evidence supports the efficacy of the new "wire-free" techniques, which appear to be comparable to the WGL in terms of safe surgical resection, while overcoming limitations associated with logistic difficulties and patient discomfort. There is still limited data in literature on the comparative effectiveness of these modern techniques, and there is no strong evidence that one is superior to the others. In particular, no randomized trials of comparison between ROLL and magnetic seed localization are currently available. The aim of this randomized study is to compare ROLL with magnetic seed to assess their efficacy for non-palpable breast lesions' localization.
Breast conservative surgery (BCS) is nowadays the standard of care for patients affected by early breast lesions. Screening programmes led to an increase of non-palpable breast lesion detection rates. These patients are often eligible for BCS and an accurate preoperative localization technique for the detection of the lesion is required to guarantee a safe surgical excision. The primary goal of BCS is to obtain a complete resection of the tumor with disease-free surgical margins. The presence of tumor on surgical margins on postoperative histological examination of the specimen increases the risk of local recurrence and it requires a surgical re-excision. For all these reasons different techniques for localization of non-palpable breast lesions have been developed over time. Since '70s the wire guided localization (WGL) technique has represented the gold standard; however it has several limitations such as wire migration or fracture and patient referred discomfort related to wire placement. Over time, other techniques have been proposed, such as the radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL), radioactive and magnetic seeds, carbon dye and ultrasound-guided preoperative localization. Currently there are several studies of comparison between the WGL and the more modern techniques. All of these data claim the effectiveness of the new "wire-free" methodics ensuring a safe surgical resection with tumor-free margins and, in some cases, a better aesthetic result. Studies of comparison between the modern techniques are limited. There is no scientific evidence of the superiority of a technique over the other. A multicentric Italian survey demonstrated that the most used localization techniques nowadays are the WGL, ROLL, the magnetic seed and the carbon dye. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare these techniques to assess their efficacy in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions.