View clinical trials related to Breast Cancer.
Filter by:Breast carcinoma requires frequently an adjuvant therapy after surgical excision: in this way, one of the major criteria indicating the need of adjuvant chemotherapy is the diagnosis of a metastatic lymph-node invasion, mainly in the axillary field. Axillary surgery is therefore mandatory at the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. For many years, in order to avoid unnecessary complications due to extensive axillary surgery (for instance, arm enlargement by lymphedema), a limited surgery is frequently performed on the first supposed invaded lymph-nodes (LN) called "sentinel" LN technique; if the sentinel LN are not invaded, extensive axillary surgery can be omitted. To decide it during the surgery, removed sentinel LN are cut in 3 to 4 slices which are examined immediately as smears (cytology) or frozen slices (pathology). However, due to hazard in cutting the LN, micro-metastases can be misdiagnosed. That is why a recent molecular biology method has been developed in which the total LN are crushed and blended, then analyzed by OSNA technique (One Step Nuclear Acid analysis) so as to amplify and detect the mRNA coding for cytokeratin-19 protein witnessing the LN metastatic invasion. A standardized automated technique is available with a mean time of 30 to 50 minutes according to the number of analyzed LN. In 12 international studies (2830 cases) the consistency between OSNA technique and final pathology is of 91 to 98% and the sensitivity seems higher. Less than 5% of all breast carcinomas cells don't express CK-19 protein. The use of OSNA technique requires a dedicated machine and a skilled pathologist, increasing slightly the operation time; however it allows to avoid the immediate and long-term complications due to the radical LN axillary surgery in case of negativity of the sentinel LN procedure. To date, the three techniques including extemporaneous examinations (OSNA or classical methods) or not (classical pathological analysis) have their own advantages and drawbacks. "SAGE" study main objective is to compare these three techniques in terms of direct costs and Quality of Life impacts. The superiority of any of these three techniques is not the purpose of SAGE study, but the economic burden of OSNA technique in comparison with the 2 others in the standard setting in France. Quality of Life and Pain evaluations will be performed immediately after surgery and during the 6 months after.
The investigators propose to examine 121 postmenopausal women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer who have been taking aromatase inhibitors (AI) for at least 6 months and are experiencing at least mild arthralgia originating during AI treatment, the yearlong effect of exercise vs. attention control (health education), and on toxic side effects of AI.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of single agent lucitanib in metastatic breast cancer patients with FGFR1-amplified, FGFR1-non amplified with 11q amplification, or FGFR1-non amplified without 11q amplification.
This is an open-label, nonrandomized, Phase 1/2 study for the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib (TAS-120). The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and anti-tumor activity of futibatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with and without genomic FGF/FGFR abnormalities. The study will be conducted in 3 parts: 1. Dose escalation portion to determine the -Maximum Tolerated Dose and/ or Recommended Phase 2 Dose of futibatinib. 2. Phase 1 expansion portion to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of futibatinib in patients with tumors harboring FGF/FGFR aberrations, including patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), primary central nervous system tumors, urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, gastric cancer. 3. Phase 2 study portion to confirm objective response rate of futibatinib in intrahepatic CCA patients with tumors harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements (incl fusions).
Using an observational prospective design, potential subjects will be identified and screened for eligibility via medical record review of breast cancer patients scheduled for radiation therapy at Duke Radiation Oncology Clinic. Subjects who agree to participate will be asked to complete study questionaires prior to the start of radiation therapy and again during the last week of therapy.
This is a phase 1b/2 study of the safety and efficacy of sapanisertib (MLN0128) in combination with exemestane or fulvestrant therapy in women with estrogen receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer who progressed on treatment with everolimus in combination with exemestane or fulvestrant.
Sentinel node (SN) biopsy in breast cancer has been demonstrated to be a reliable method, and several follow-up studies have shown that it is safe to refrain from completion axillary clearance (axillary lymph node dissection, ALND) in SN-negative patients. SN biopsy alone results in significantly less arm discomfort following the operation. However, as a surprisingly low frequency of axillary relapse has been observed in patients without any axillary intervention (neither SN biopsy nor axillary clearance), or without completion ALND after a positive SN biopsy, the importance of ALND is being questioned, even for patients with SN metastases. A large, randomized study (ISBCG23-1) was not able to show any differences in 5-year disease-free survival between patients with SN micrometastases who had undergone ALND and those who had not. This Swedish multicenter study will include patients with SN micrometastases. These women will not undergo ALND but will be registered in a study cohort. The patients will otherwise be treated in accordance with the national guidelines and will be clinically followed every year for five years, after 10 years and finally after 15 years. Hypothesis: To refrain from axillary clearance in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases does not impair survival.
This is a Phase 2 study to see if an investigational drug, ANG1005, can shrink tumor cells in breast cancer patients with recurrent brain metastases.
This phase I dose escalation study will evaluate IGF-Methotrexate conjugate (765IGF-MTX) in patients with advanced, previously treated tumors. 765IGF-MTX is administered as an IV infusion over 1 hour on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. Assessment of response will be confirmed with imaging studies performed at the end of cycle 2 +/- 7 days, and every 2 weeks thereafter.
This single-arm, open-label, local multicenter study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of trastuzumab administered subcutaneously (SC) by a single-use injection device (SID) in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (EBC), following surgery and chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant or adjuvant).