Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05795842 |
Other study ID # |
STUDY00004530 |
Secondary ID |
1R01HL166233-01 |
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 21, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
December 2028 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Emory University |
Contact |
Xiao Hu, PhD |
Phone |
404-712-8520 |
Email |
xhu40[@]emory.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal heart rhythm. Because AF is often asymptomatic, it
often remains undiagnosed in the early stages. Anticoagulant therapy greatly reduces the
risks of stroke in patients diagnosed with AF. However, diagnosis of AF requires long-term
ambulatory monitoring procedures that are burdensome and/or expensive.
Smart devices (such as Apple or Fitbit) use light sensors (called "photoplethysmography" or
PPG) and motion sensors (called "accelerometers") to continuously record biometric data,
including heart rhythm. Smart devices are already widely adopted.
This study seeks to validate an investigational machine-learning software (also called
"algorithms") for the long-term monitoring and detection of abnormal cardiac rhythms using
biometric data collected from consumer smart devices.
The research team aims to enroll 500 subjects who are being followed after a stroke event of
uncertain cause at the Emory Stroke Center. Subjects will undergo standard long-term cardiac
monitoring (ECG), using FDA-approved wearable devices fitted with skin electrodes or
implantable continuous recorders, and backed by FDA-approved software for abnormal rhythm
detection.
Patients will wear a study-provided consumer wrist device at home, for the 30 days of ECG
monitoring, 23 hours a day. At the end of the 30 days, the device data will be uploaded to a
secure cloud server and will be analyzed offline using proprietary software (called
"algorithms") and artificial intelligence strategies. Detection of AF events using the
investigational algorithms will be compared to the results from the standard monitoring to
assess their reliability. Attention will be paid to recorded motion artifacts that can affect
the quality and reliability of recorded signals.
The ultimate aim is to establish that smart devices can potentially be used for monitoring
purposes when used with specialized algorithms. Smart devices could offer an affordable
alternative to standard-of-care cardiac monitoring.
Description:
An estimated 1.6% - 6% of the population over age 65 have undiagnosed and often asymptomatic
AF. Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) reduces the risks of ischemic stroke by 64% and
all-cause mortality by 26% for those diagnosed with AF. Hence, not proactively diagnosing and
treating AF will be too great an opportunity to miss. Opportunistic AF screening is endorsed
as a cost-effective way of diagnosing AF at primary care facilities and/or pharmacies using
various techniques. However, the benefits, costs, and potential harms of more powerful
systematic AF screening remain a matter of debate. Continuous AF monitoring is also needed to
characterize AF occurrence in terms of its burden and temporal relation to symptoms. On the
other hand, technologies for continuous monitoring of AF need excellent acceptability by
patients. Well-established ambulatory techniques (e.g., Holter) are not suited because of
their poor wearability and short monitoring duration. Techniques of implantable loop
recorders have advanced significantly to support AF monitoring. However, only some patients
can experience the benefits of these techniques because of their associated high costs and
invasiveness. Cutaneous ECG patches are clinically used for AF monitoring, but they last for
2 to 4 weeks and are limited to a selected patient population with approved reimbursement.
Consumer-facing solutions exist to provide spot-check ECG with an accuracy on par with that
of clinical ECG devices, but they are not continuous and are infeasible for patients with
compromised fine motor functions.
In contrast to these techniques, PPG is much better positioned for passive AF monitoring
because of its strong physiological premise and the practical consideration that PPG sensors
are ubiquitously available in more than 71% of consumer wearable devices. However, because
PPG is ubiquitously available on mainstream wearables with companion software capable of
generating AF alerts, laypeople can readily use PPG to monitor themselves and take actions
without clinician guidance. An untoward consequence of this approach is the potential
inappropriate utilization of healthcare resources when following up on false AF detections by
potentially millions of users. Unfortunately, algorithms described in 24 published papers
have not yet achieved adequate precision that can effectively combat such a risk. For
example, many studies reported an accuracy of > 95% but a 5% of error is still too high for a
technology that will be used by millions of people to continuously monitor AF in free-living
settings.