View clinical trials related to Robotics.
Filter by:Single-POrt Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery versus single-port video-assisted Thoracic Surgery major pulmonary resection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (SPORTS trial): a single-center, a single blinded, randomized controlled trial
Within the MobiStaR project the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients significantly, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation outcomes for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization. The intervention study will assess the organizational feasibility of robot-assisted early mobilization (starting in the first 72 hours after admission to the ICU), the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals and the effects on patient outcomes in terms of ventilation time, muscle mass (sonographic examination) and physical activity (measured by established scores such as Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU) and Medical Research Council (MRC) classification).
A total of 26 patients who were diagnosed with CP [diplegic, with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level of 2-5] and who regularly participated in a rehabilitation programme were included in the study after obtaining approval from their parents. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 (n = 13) received conventional therapy (65 min, 2 days/week ×8) and group 2 (n = 13) received 25 minutes of robot-assisted gait training (RoboGait®) in addition to conventional therapy (40 min, 2 days/week ×8).
Feasibility trial investigating the potential higher frequency of robotic assisted early mobilization in intubated COVID19 patients on the ICU.
To investigate the effect of mental fatigue on industrial work performance, biomechanical determinants, (electro-)(psycho-) physiological measures and physical ergonomics. Additionally, the current project wants to evaluate whether or not the Laevo exoskeleton influences the aforementioned parameters when mental fatigue is acutely induced.
The overall objective of this investigation is to understand the patient response to a robotic platform used to facilitate telehealth triage in the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the manner in which emergency department triage is completed. Attempts at cohorting individuals with potential COVID-19 disease in order to prevent disease transmission to healthcare workers and minimize the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) have renewed interest in telemedical solutions as a method to triage and manage individuals with COVID-19. This investigation deploys a legged robotic platform to facilitate agile, highly mobile telemedicine to manage COVID-19 patients in the emergency department. The primary objective is to measure the patient response to interacting with these systems.
The SPIRIT study is interventional, national, prospective, open, bicentric each patient being his/her own control. It is conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Atalante exoskeleton system in patients presenting a non-traumatic acute-subacute hemiplegia. The primary endpoint is defined by the patient's ability to perform the 10 MWT with the Atalante system. The study will include 16 patients and takes place in two french rehabilitation centers.
The study is a prospective, open, bicentric and observational study. It is conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Atalante exoskeleton system with patients with lower limb paralysis. The principal objective is to assess the performance of the Atalante system in performing ambulatory functions with motor complete SCI patients characterized by the success rate in performing a 10mWT at the last session of training with the Atalante system.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to attempt to enhance the precision of bone preparation, component alignment and ultimately improve clinical results and survivorship of TKA. Although several published data suggest that bone preparation, and knee component alignment were improved by using robotic assistance, there is no high-quality evidence from randomized trials at long-term of which investigators are aware evaluating whether the improved bone preparation and knee component alignment improved clinical function or longevity of the TKA.
Comparison of endoscopic thyroidectomy, robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open surgery, the safety of the operation, the timing of the operation and the complications.