View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:This is a Phase 2 randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of COVI-MSC in the setting of current standard of care treatments for subjects hospitalized subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome not related to COVID-19 infection.
This is a phase II study to test adenosine efficacy for down-regulation of the overwhelming inflammation of COVID-19 in the lungs as reflected by clinical recovery of lung function; resolution of clinically relevant markers of lung function, and resolution of systemic markers of inflammation and coagulation.
Covid-19 also primarily affects endothelium that line up the alveoli. The resulting hypoxemia may differ from "typical" Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to maldistribution of perfusion related to the ventilation. Thus, pathophysiology of Covid-19 ARDS is different, which requires different interventions than typical ARDS. The investigators will assess whether extravascular lung water index and permeability of the alveolar capillary differs from typical ARDS with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique. Extravascular Lung Water Index (EVLWI) and Pulmonary Vascular Permeability Index (PVPI) will be compared.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety of Umbilical Cord Tissue Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UCMSCs) administered intravenously in patients with acute pulmonary inflammation due to COVID-19 with moderately severe symptoms
Prospective observational study of patients treated due to Covid-19 disease. Observation and analysis of echocardiographic studies performed in the intensive care setting.
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. COVID-19 causes life threatening complications known as Cytokine Release Syndrome or Cytokine Storm and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. These complications are the main causes of death in this global pandemic. Over 1000 clinical trials are on-going worldwide to diagnose, treat, and improve the aggressive clinical course of COVID-19. The investigators propose the first, and so far, only gene therapy solution that has the potential to address this urgent unmet medical need. Rationale 1. There are striking similarities between the damaged lung environment of COVID-19 induced ARDS and the tumor microenvironment (exposed collagen from tissue destruction by invading tumor or by the virus-induced immune response, and presence of activated proliferative cells (cancer cells and tumor associated fibroblasts or activated T cells, macrophages and pulmonary fibroblasts in COVID-19); 2. DeltaRex-G is a disease-seeking retrovector encoding a cytocidal dominant negative human cyclin G1 as genetic payload). When injected intravenously, the DeltaRex-G nanoparticles has a navigational system that targets exposed collagenous proteins (XC proteins) in injured tissues (e.g. inflamed lung, kidney, etc.), thus increasing the effective drug concentration at the sites of injury, in the vicinity of activated/proliferative T cells evoked by COVID-19. Our hypothesis is that DeltaRex-G then enters the rapidly dividing T cells and kills them by arresting the G1cell division cycle, hence, reducing cytokine release and ARDS; 3. Intravenous DeltaRex-G has minimal systemic toxicity due to its navigational system (targeting properties) that limits the biodistribution of DeltaRex-G only to areas of injury where exposed collagenous (XC) proteins are abnormally found; and 4. DeltaRex-G is currently available in FDA approved "Right to Try" or Expanded Access Program for Stage 4 cancers for an intermediate size population. To gain this approval, FDA requires DeltaRex-G to have demonstrated safety and efficacy in early clinical trials.
The study aims to evaluate the reduction in severity and progression of lung injury with three doses of lipid ibuprofen in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections.
According to the anatomical proximity of the heart temporarily elevated intrathoracic pressures may have direct and indirect effects on the cardiovascular system. Undesirable hemodynamic effects of a recruitment maneuver primarily arise from the transiently increased airway pressure, manifesting in decreased right heart filling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, a drop in left ventricular systolic transmural pressure, right and left heart ventricular interactions and subsequent changes in cardiac index. These effects can be more pronounced in patients suffering from ARDS, a condition commonly accompanied by hemodynamic instability. The complex pathophysiological changes account for why routine intensive care monitoring, such as invasive arterial blood pressure or central venous pressure monitoring is insufficient to follow hemodynamic changes under recruitment maneuver. Previous studies by the same research team confirmed that the alveolar recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation in patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure under pressure supported ventilation. Following recruitment maneuver, arterial oxygenation increased in 74 % of all patients. However, there is lack of information regarding the actual degree of changes in transpulmonary pressure and the consequent hemodynamic alterations. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate precisely the transpulmonary pressure changes during recruitment in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure ventilated in pressure support mode following insertion of a balloon-catheter into the esophagus. In the meantime, hemodynamic changes are monitored by PiCCO and transthoracic echocardiography, and lung field aeration by electric impedance tomography.
Sedation may have many drawbacks in ICU patients: cardiovascular, neurologic, muscular. Light sedation and Pressure Support ventilation is feasible in ARDS patients. However spontaneous breathing can lead to high transpulmonary pressure. The goal of the study is to measure transpulmonary pressure before sedation decrease and after stabilization. The main endpoint is transpulmonary pressure less than 24 cmH2O.
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) remains a major respiratory disorder for the increasing preterm population, and its incidence has been confirmed to be increased gradually with decreased gestational age. Previous studies demonstrated incidences of 90% at 24 weeks', 80% at 28 weeks', 57% at 30-31 weeks', and 25% at 35-36 weeks' gestational age(GA). However, these figures were mainly performed in the pre-neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) era, in which ARDS was usually considered as RDS, and surfactant was therefore used repeatedly. In fact, no studies have indicated beneficial effects of surfactant for adult and pediatric ARDS, and therefore, its exact action for neonatal ARDS was needed to be further elucidated. In 2017, the international ARDS collaborative group provided the first consensus definition for neonatal ARDS, and the exact incidence of neonatal ARDS and mortality were unknown.